“borderline significant”

Although pre-existing CPA was borderline significant in multivariate analysis of all-cause mortality (p = 0.0502), MAC-PD patients who developed CPA showed extremely poor prognoses (Fig.

A borderline significant difference was observed between CBP80-32 and the non-edited control under WD (p = 0.0502), suggesting a trend towards increased PDH expression in CBP80-32.

When adjusting for potential confounders, this was borderline significant ( P = .0503) but significant when adjusting only for likely confounders ( P = .025; Table S2 ).

This was statistically higher (p=0.0002) compared with the medical student group (38%) and borderline significant (p=0.0503) compared with the postgraduate group (36%) ( figure 2C–D ).

SERPINA7 rs1804495 was borderline significant (P = 0.0503), perhaps due to a small sample size.

VEGF also showed a similar profile, with the P value between LTBI and PTB being borderline significant ( P = .0503) ( Supplementary Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 1 ).

Analysis of primary endpoint in the sub-group who completed the questionnaire showed a borderline significant difference between the intervention group and the control group, Peto & Peto Wilcoxon test p = 0.05039.

The difference between women and men was borderline significant, with a higher likelihood of positive results in women (OR 2.70; 95% CI: 0.96–7.62; P = 0.0504).

A trend toward increasing age was observed across tertiles, with a borderline significant difference ( p = 0.0504), while no significant differences were observed in weight ( p = 0.764) or sex distribution.

60%), with a borderline significant association (OR = 8.67, p = 0.0504), supporting the hypothesis that prolonged viral replication increases the risk of resistance development [ 22 ].

For HOXA4 , the top DMR in WRN ‐mutant patients, the correlation between promoter methylation and age was borderline significant ( p = 0.0504).

A supportive, but borderline significant trend was seen with lines with delayed courtship, none of which showed aggression (0 of 24, P = 0.0504, Pearson’s chi square).

Excepting the 3-year follow-up, when just a borderline significant difference regarding the visual acuity between the Ex-PRESS and standard trabeculectomy group was observed ( p = 0.0504), the Ex-PRESS groups showed significantly better visual acuity at 6 weeks ( p = 0.0324), 1 year ( p = 0.0168), 2 years ( p = 0.0162), and 4 years ( p = 0.0111).

However, the test for multivariate model was borderline significant ( P = 0.0505) ( S4 Table ).

Improvements in the digital health literacy scale (eHEALS) were borderline significant ( p = 0.0506) and significant for Dari speakers ( p < 0.05).

TSH was highest in HBsAg-negative individuals for both sexes, showing a borderline significant difference between groups ( p = 0.0507; Figure 4 a).

The nested effect of the source population within species (populations used for experiments) was also significant for body length (F 2, 97 = 13.78 P < 0.001) and borderline significant for total body length (F 2, 97 = 3.08 P = 0.0508), indicating that despite much variation across populations, D. parvula was consistently smaller than D. retrocurva .

Although no significant differences were observed at 2 years, the Magmaris cohort showed a borderline significant primary endpoint reduction (5.1% vs. 11% respectively, p = 0.051).

Both the categories of “most advanced degree in education” and “total household income” exhibited a borderline significant association with HL ( p = 0.051 and p = 0.052, respectively).

Student hat-wearing rates did not differ significantly according to any of the other demographic characteristics considered (SunSmart status, sun-protection policy score, and school size), except for school type, where the difference in hat-wearing rates between combined primary-secondary schools (43.9%) and dedicated primary schools (23.1%) was borderline significant ( p = 0.051; Table 2 ).

Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in IOP and a borderline significant difference in medication use (p = 0.051) between phakic and pseudophakic eyes.

Fluorescein staining score (FSS) Analysis of studies measuring ocular FSS at 4 weeks ( k = 6) showed a borderline significant improvement (SMD = −0.68, 95% CI = [−1.36, 0.00], P = .051; I 2 = 79.2%; Figure 3 (B).

SHI while clinically stable was a significant predictor of infective exacerbations (β = 0.035, p = 0.035), and FEV 1 %Predicted was borderline significant (β = − 0.049, p = 0.051; Table 3 ).

The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio shows a borderline significant association with sarcopenia risk when considering all patients (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98–1.10, p = 0.051).

During the follow-up, patients with post-traumatic stress disorder had persistently higher scores on the HADS total score up to the third evaluation and anxiety subscore up to the fourth evaluation (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.047 to 4.935, p < 0.05), with higher scores on sleep quality (worse sleep) (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.372 to 3.539, p < 0.03) at the first, third, and fourth evaluations, with lower scores on health-related quality of life at the first, second, and fourth evaluations (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.615 to 3.634, p < 0.02), and a borderline significant difference at the second evaluation (“ t ” test, t = 1.980, p = 0.051).