“borderline significant”

The item “Yoga should be recommended as complementary therapy for managing lifestyle disorders” showed a borderline significant difference across batches (χ2 = 9.45, df = 4, p = 0.051), with a small effect size (ε2 = 0.0614).

568.8 ± 171.9; p = 0.0008), the differences in levels of plasma IL-6 between CAPS and persistent sJIA were borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

For pack-years, IL-6 was significant (β = 0.26, p < 0.001), and IL-17C was borderline significant (β = 0.15, p = 0.051), but with no meaningful AIC or coefficient changes (Supplementary Table S12).

Molecular function OXNOS In lowlanders, chronic HA decreased A • − ( P = 0.034, d = −0.852, borderline significant following non‐parametric analysis: P = 0.051, r = −0.461).

Latencies The latency of the wave in ring 1 mfERG in the affected eye was statistically significantly longer than the control eye after three months ( p = 0.011), while in rings 3 and 4, borderline significant, or significantly longer, latencies were observed in the affected eye at the first examination (ring 3 p = 0.051; ring 4 p = 0.044), and in rings 2 and 5 there was no significant difference in latencies between the affected and control eyes throughout the observed examinations ( Figure 4 ).

There was a borderline significant difference regarding age at diagnosis, F (1,88) = 3.92, p = 0.051.

All six lung cancer patients had positive aCL antibodies, and colon cancer patients had a borderline significant association ( p = 0.051).

There was a significant effect of population density on this measure across the entire day ( F (3,168) = 4.23, p = 0.007 and during the light period ( F (3,168) = 3.30, p = 0.02, and a borderline significant effect during the dark period ( F (3,168) = 2.65, p = 0.051.

the positive treatment effect slightly increased over time); however, it was only borderline significant ( P = 0.051, Appendix Figure 6, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A365 ).

Error rate Incorrect responses/accuracy There was a main effect of condition ( p = .005) and a borderline significant condition-by-group interaction ( p = .051), but no main group effect ( p = .361).

The VEGFR2 rs2071559 C variant was a borderline significant risk factor for poor local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) (uncorrected p = 0.051).

We could also see inverse borderline significant association between methylation site cg11024682 and ABCG 1 gene transcript (β eff = −0.185, P = 0.051) marking a possible trans effect between the methylation locus and the gene annotated to a different chromosome (Supplementary Table 4 ).

Patients with malignancy had higher CRP levels, D-dimer, and TLC, as well as lower lymphocyte count, Hb, hematocrit, and CrCl (CrCl borderline significant, p = 0.051).

There was also a reduction in total cholesterol (p = 0.03), as well as borderline significant reductions in LDL-cholesterol and the ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol (both p = 0.051).

A simple correlation between monthly rainfall and elephant numbers was borderline significant (Pearson r = -0.18, p=0.051), indicating fewer elephant with more rain, but explained less than 3% of the variation in elephant numbers ( Figure 8b ).

This means that a strongly nonsignificant p -value is equally likely to be treated by publication selection bias and dropped with an equal probability in the case of publication bias as it is in the case of p-hacking (e.g., borderline significant results, p = 0.051 or far off p = 0.9).

There was a borderline significant correlation ( P < 0.051) between the use of the ARCS codes and the total number of coded behaviours per consultation.

The total effect of physical activity was found borderline significant (β = -0.11, p = 0.051).

During the follow-up, patients with post-traumatic stress disorder had persistently higher scores on the HADS total score up to the third evaluation and anxiety subscore up to the fourth evaluation (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.047 to 4.935, p < 0.05), with higher scores on sleep quality (worse sleep) (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.372 to 3.539, p < 0.03) at the first, third, and fourth evaluations, with lower scores on health-related quality of life at the first, second, and fourth evaluations (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.615 to 3.634, p < 0.02), and a borderline significant difference at the second evaluation (“ t ” test, t = 1.980, p = 0.051).

All-cause mortality and composite endpoint in acute MI patients at 7 years follow-up In patients with an acute MI (TnT release > 50 ng/L) at baseline, unadjusted SERPINA3 was significantly associated with all-cause mortality only in males at 7 years follow-up, but the association was weakened and borderline significant (p = 0.051) in the multivariable analysis, and presented with a non-significant p-value for interaction between the biomarker and sex (p = 0.17) ( Supplementary Table 3 ).

The difference in confidence between the seventh year students compared to sixth year students (78.9% vs 45%) was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

In the advanced disease study, the proportion of patients with detectable IL1β was significantly higher in gastro-oesophageal junction cancers than in other sites ( p = 0.006) and IL12 was detected more frequently in gastric cancers, although this was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

When stratified by cell-of-origin, the association between rs822336 and RFS was borderline significant in ABC-DLBCL (Kaplan–Meier, p = 0.051), whereas no association was observed in the GCB subtype ( p = 0.300).

Differences were statistically significant for total SCFAs ( p = 0.028), in line with the correlation results, as well as for acetate ( p = 0.041) and propionate ( p = 0.028), and borderline significant in the case of butyrate ( p = 0.051), isobutyrate ( p = 0.084), and isovalerate ( p = 0.090) ( Figure 8 ).

A borderline significant OS benefit was observed with FTD–TPI + bevacizumab after accounting for time-dependent effects (Wald test P = 0.051; Supplementary Figure S6 , available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2026.106907 ).