clearly significantqualified
The analysis revealed a slightly but significant bias in the case of the bone volume ( b i a s H i s t o − M R I : B o n e v o l u m e = 2.40 % , p < 0.005 ) and a clearly significant deviation for the remaining defect width ( b i a s H i s t o − M R I : D e f e c t w i d t h = − 6.73 % , p ≪ 0.005 ) .