“close to significance”

However, lymph node involvement (N0-N1 vs N2-N3) was close to significance with a hazard ratio of 2.46 (0.97-6.25, p=0.059).

There was close to significance of the rate of PD at the second radiological response evaluation ( p = 0.059).

Although there was no significance both in SP and DP, whereas the OM group shows close to significance ( P = 0.059).

The reanalysis entering age as a covariate yielded similar results with a trauma × sex interaction remaining close to significance ( P = .059).

KI-67 gene expression was close to significance as a risk factor (HR = 1.403; 95% CI: 0.988 – 1.992; P = 0.059) for malignant melanoma progression.

The percentage of SRE in patients with a single BM was 65.6% vs 41.9% in patients with multiple BMs, with a result close to significance ( P = 0.059).

While parental age and preferred social media platform come close to significance ( P = 0.059), the influence of being a female parent cannot be overlooked, exhibiting a compelling significance at P = 0.02. 4.

As the same term was close to significance for state 1 with opposite sign ( t 6 = − 2.32, p = 0.059, Cohen’s d = − 0.55 ± 0.87), we probed the difference between state 1 and 3 counts (Counts 3 − Counts 1 ) in a follow-up analysis: the interaction remained significant ( t 6 = 4.6, p = 0.004, Cohen’s d = 1.08 ± 0.92), indicating that the more state 3 is expressed over state 1, the better the recovery, in a way that also depends on the MR signature.

Clinical pregnancy rate was not higher in endometriosis but was close to significance (47.0% vs. 32.3%, p = 0.059) while live birth rate was comparable (27.3% vs. 32.3%, p = 0.746).

The increase of the rejection rates after AC187 or vehicle infusions was close to significance (Fig. 5b , p = 0.0596, t = 2.245, df = 7).

Sex, age, COI, and whether the patient had surgery did not affect the timeliness of receiving PT (p>0.17) while the effect of language was close to significance (p=0.06).

And the breed could also be a third variable to analyze in the observed CM frequencies, since the vaccinated HFRS animals were close to significance ( p = 0.06) when compared with the control group, in accordance with the SCC result, a contrast that was not observed with HF animals ( Table 3 ).

Variation of CoG location of TES between groups accounted for 50% of the variance and in the antero‐posterior direction were close to significance (main effect group: F [3, 22] = 3.7, p = .06, η 2 = .500), but not in the medio‐lateral direction (main effect group: F [3, 25] = 0.62, p = .61, η 2 = .078). 4.4.

At the 8-month trial visit, 4 months after transitioning from 115 to 150 mg/m 2 dosing, progerin was further decreased to levels close to significance (n=25, P =0.06), and at each of the 4 subsequent trial visits, progerin was significantly decreased while taking 150 mg/m 2 of lonafarnib over the 115 mg/m 2 dose (n=22–25 patients, all P <0.05).

There was a negative significant correlation between PAF‐AH activity and Psa level (r = −0.402; p = 0.018) and a positive correlation between PAF‐AH activity and MDA level that was close to significance (r = 0.326, p = 0.06).

An effect close to significance was found for the interaction between distance and type of stimulation [F (1,27) = 3.8, p = 0.06, η 2 p = 0.12].

The nodes with a statistically significant correlation to the CPT-C ratio are grouped in a cluster that is close to significance ( p = 0.06; Fig. 4A.1 ) within the beta frequency interval (25.5–30 Hz).

42 When we used qPCR to measure the abundance of the corresponding transcripts in PBMC from MIS-C patients, we observed that the baseline (ie unstimulated) mRNA levels of SOCS1, TOLLIP, and SHIP1 were higher in the MIS-C patient cells relative to healthy controls (the comparison for SARM1 was close to significance, P = 0.06) ( Fig. 2A for heatmap and Fig. 2B for boxplots).

Central Jakarta shows a similar pattern with r = 0.259 and a p ‐value close to significance ( p = 0.06), indicating a minor inverse association.

From 18 to 48 h, cell growth is significantly reduced in ncr1 Δ cyb5 Δ relative to wild-type and ncr1 Δ ( P < 0.05 ) and close to significance ( P = 0.06 ) relative to cyb5 Δ.

However, the comparison with the GA group was close to significance ( p = 0.060).

Finally, close to significance (P = 0.06) was the fall odds of individuals with cardiovascular disease (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.99–1.57).

On the other hand, the jump test showed statistically significant correlations with the Standard Progressive Matrices Subtest of the Raven test (r = 0.24; p < 0.01) and an association close to significance with the following WISC-V variables: balances (r = 0.16; p = 0.06), composite score (r = 0.17; p = 0.054), and Fluid Reasoning Index (r = 0.17; p = 0.054).

As with the preliminary signature from the broad-spectrum analysis, in our model, animals from the 20 Gy group were less distinguishable from the others although the AUC was close to significance ( p-value = 0.06).

No effect of hearing status was found on the turn duration at low background noise, although the result was close to significance ( p = 0.06).