Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

78,911 sentences · 78,911 papers · 119,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.071.4× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendP = 0.071.4× alpha
Both old and young experienced a similar absolute level of PFE at LONG muscle lengths, although old showed a trend toward greater PFE than young which did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.07) (Table 1 ), whereas at SHORT lengths old had significantly lower PFE ( P < 0.05).
showed a trendp = 0.0701.4× alpha
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.1823.6× alphaplainly factual
For the thalamic volumes, while the left thalamus showed a trend-level difference after correction (corrected p = 0.070), the right thalamus did not reach statistical significance (corrected p = 0.182).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.071.4× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp = 0.071.4× alpha
5 , 6 In our study, the use of biologics was significantly associated with an increased rate of endoscopic improvement ( p = 0.01), but only showed a trend for higher MH that did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.07).
Male sex showed a trend toward incomplete occlusion (aOR 3.2; p = 0.07) that did not reach statistical significance. 19 ) The multicenter study: A practice-defining contribution The multicenter analysis redefines the evidence base for FDS after SAC in several important ways. 19 ) First, the 98.3% technical success rate across 22 institutions definitively answers the previously debated question of whether FDS deployment within a pre-existing SAC stent is reliably achievable: it is, when performed by experienced teams using contemporary delivery systems.
a positive trendp = 0.071.4× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.071.4× alphaplainly factual
The findings indicated that vaginal administration was significantly associated with HPV lesion resolution (RR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.57–3.11, p < 0.00001; I 2 = 0%), whereas oral administration showed a positive trend that did not reach statistical significance (RR = 1.51, 95% CI: 0.96–2.38, p = 0.07; I 2 = 0%).
did not reach statistical significanceP > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
a marginal trendP = 0.071.4× alphagold
There was a marginal trend toward differences in Lactobacillus abundance in rectal feces between the following time points: FD3 vs FD21 ( P = 0.07), FD7 vs FD21 ( P = 0.07), and FD14 vs FD21 ( P = 0.10), although these differences did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05) ( Table 3 ).
Under standard testing conditions, the association between the composite LLQ score and either LLVA or LLD was only borderline significant in the overall cohort ( P = 0.07), and did not reach statistical significance among subjects with AMD.
Drug-induced acute diarrhea showed a trend toward significance (OR = 6.35, 95% CI = 0.84-48.0, p = 0.070), as did age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.91-1.09, p = 0.074) and age at transplantation (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87-1.01, p = 0.118), although these did not reach statistical significance.