Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

The results showed that in patients with necrotising soft tissue infection, an increase in L-NMMA entailed an increase in arginine ( p < 0.0001), homoarginine ( p = 0.027), and ADMA ( p < 0.0001); there was also a positive correlation between arginine and homoarginine ( p = 0.029) and arginine and ADMA ( p = 0.007); the correlation between homoarginine and IL-10 was at the limit of significance ( p = 0.050); the other correlations did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 4 A).
Four studies[ 16 38 39 40 ] reported on the estimated blood loss, which was less in the PLDH group (361 patients) when compared with the ODH group (626 patients) (weighted mean difference [WMD] −106.93; 95% confidence interval [CI] −215.64–1.78), but this did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.05) [ Figure 2a ].
One-way ANOVA tests were performed with and without the semasbestic wavelengths obtained in pig hearts, and found that even when including the semasbestic wavelengths of the pig hearts, P -values did not reach statistical significance ( P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).
In case an association did not reach statistical significance at conventional thresholds that account for correction for multiple comparisons (e.g., p < 0.05, familywise error corrected), we explicitly considered the former as providing “exploratory evidence.” ANOVA was used for continuous and normally distributed data and Kruskal–Wallis or Mann–Whitney were used for non-normally distributed data.
Findings reported in Table 3 indicate that living in a yellowlined area in 2017 was positively associated with NDI relative to green – and bluelined areas ( β = 0.80, p = 0.00); living in redlined areas trended in the expected direction but did not reach statistical significance at the p < 0.05 level ( β = −0.65, p = 0.08).
While the haplotype composed of the wild type allele of rs1054135 and the recessive alleles of rs16909196 and rs16909187 ( GTT ) was found at higher proportion in the control group when compared to the obese or overweight group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.05).