Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

103,339 sentences · 103,339 papers · 0 search hits before verification

In the literature

Contrary to expectations, our study showed that the mediating effect of FT on the DII-S-Klotho association did not reach statistical significance, but displayed a trend towards significance after controlling for confounding factors (p = 0.056).
The pre-dementia group had fewer hospital visits related to pancreas cancer (IRR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, FDR-adjusted P = 0.010), and showed a trend toward fewer visits for colon cancer (IRR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–1.00, FDR-adjusted P = 0.056), though it did not reach statistical significance.
Additionally, the interaction between time × APOE ε4 status showed a trend toward significance ( F [1,90] = 3.736, p = 0.056, partial η 2 = 0.040), suggesting that the decline in distress over time may have been moderated by genetic risk, although this effect did not reach statistical significance. χ 2 Tests examined whether behavioral adaptations (yes/no) differed between the online and onsite intervention groups at 3 and 6 months.
a negative trendp = 0.05651.1× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.05651.1× alphaplainly factual
Although the association between total training sessions and DBP improvement showed a negative trend, it did not reach statistical significance (β = −0.0340, p = 0.0565), implying that increasing the number of sessions may contribute to DBP reduction, but the evidence remains insufficient.
There was a clear trend towards significance in the association between high SERPINE1 expression and poor patient survival (HR 1.78, 95%CI 0.98–3.23, p = 0.057), however the differences observed among groups, did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0571.1× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp = 0.0571.1× alpha
Close margins showed a trend toward increased risk that did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio 2.18, 95% CI 0.98–4.86, p = 0.057; 8 events among 38 patients), likely reflecting limited statistical power given the small number of events.