Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

102,620 sentences · 102,620 papers · 0 search hits before verification

In the literature

showed a trendp = 0.0531.1× alpha
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.60812.2× alphaplainly factual
Gross total resection showed a trend toward improved survival (HR = 0.563, 95% CI: 0.315–1.007, p = 0.053), though it did not reach statistical significance. 5-ALA remained non-significant in the multivariable model (HR = 0.885, 95% CI: 0.554–1.413, p = 0.608), suggesting that while it improves resection extent, it does not independently affect survival when accounting for other clinical variables. 3.6.
a clear trendp = 0.0531.1× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0531.1× alphaplainly factual
Although ITGA11 did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate analysis, it showed a clear trend toward being an independent prognostic risk factor (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 2.024 [0.992–4.131], p = 0.053; Table S7 ).
The near-significant trends observed—slightly lower hemoglobin ( p = 0.053) and slightly lower corrected calcium ( p = 0.075) in fallers—may reflect potential associations that did not reach statistical significance in this sample and are consistent with prior studies in which anemia and subtle disturbances in calcium homeostasis have been reported to be associated with impaired muscle strength, balance instability, and falls [ 39 , 40 ].
Regarding the HFHL, the positive correlations observed in the Q2 and Q3 of NHR did not reach statistical significance (Q2: OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.20; Q3: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.45), and Q4 could be considered as marginally significant (Q4: OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.46, p = 0.054).
For 30-day readmission, a negative correlation was observed (Spearman’s ρ = -0.158), with the result approaching significance (p = 0.054), implying a possible trend toward fewer readmissions in those with a history of COVID-19, though this did not reach statistical significance.
The pre-dementia group had fewer hospital visits related to pancreas cancer (IRR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, FDR-adjusted P = 0.010), and showed a trend toward fewer visits for colon cancer (IRR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–1.00, FDR-adjusted P = 0.056), though it did not reach statistical significance.