In singles with a migration background not having used condoms was reported slightly less commonly (33.2 vs 45.1%), but this did not reach statistical significance at p < 0.05 ( Table 2 ).
← all phrases
“did not reach statistical significance”
In the literature
A smaller decrease was present in Z-138 cells which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.05), suggesting there may be other mechanisms contributing to the mitotic dysregulation seen in these cells.
Although the increase in MNF2 ( Figure 5 A) and OPA1 did not reach statistical significance ( Figure 5 C), a significant increase in MFN1 protein content ( Figure 5 B, p < 0.05) was observed in leukocytes after RYGB.
Short-chain fatty acids The total fecal SCFA concentrations and the concentrations of propionate and butyrate increased significantly from D0 to D90 ( P = 0.04, 0.03, 0.03, respectively), while acetate concentrations showed a marginal trend but did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.05).
The calculated LDL-C F levels seem to be lower than LDL-C VAP levels at the postprandial states, while the difference did not reach statistical significance ( P < 0.05, Figure 2A ).
Similar to the result of total complications, bleeding-related complication rates were found to be lower with use of VCD compared with MC in cardiac interventional procedures, but did not reach statistical significance (RR: 0.77, random-effect model, 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.00, p = 0.05; Figure 5(c) ).
87.18 ± 12.24, p = 0.045), but the odds ratio (OR) did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.96 [95% CI 0.93–1.00], p = 0.050).
did not reach statistical significanceP-value <0.05
The C2B 2 ( MAML3 ) subtype was positively associated with metastatic disease, consistent with the WNT-altered (TCGA) subtype having aggressive clinical features 15 , but did not reach statistical significance (Fisher exact test BH-adj, P-value <0.05) in our analyis (Supplementary Table 1 ).
The associations between worldview orientations and the remaining risk facets did not reach statistical significance of p < 0.05.
While the difference in post-test total scores between groups did not reach statistical significance, both groups demonstrated a significant gain in total knowledge following the FSL with moderate effect sizes (TG: p < 0.05, r = 0.37; IG: p < 0.005, r = 0.47) (Table 4 ).
These associations, however, did not reach statistical significance ( p < 0.05) after multiple testing correction which may be due to the limited statistical power from the small dataset (Additional file 1 : Tables S9 and S10).
Additionally, providers 5 to 10 years after completion of training had a trend toward higher average number of PrEP prescriptions prescribed in the past 6 months (1.7) in comparison to those less than 5 years after training (1.3) and over 10 years from training (1.4), although the difference did not reach statistical significance ( P < .05).
Additionally, although they did not reach statistical significance for single studies within which they were tested, laxity on anterior drawer testing (univariable analysis OR; 1.70 95%CI = 0.84–3.30 p = 0.05 (multivariable analysis OR; 1.68 95%CI = 0.98 − 2.88 p = 0.06) and a popliteal fossa effusion (univariable analysis RR; 1.61 95%CI = 0.91–2.84 p = 0.10 (multivariable analysis RR 1.68 95%CI = 0.94–3.03 p = 0.08) may have some prognostic ( Supplementary file 10 ) importance [ 27 ].
However, that difference did not reach statistical significance ( t -test, p < 0.05).
Female patients showed a trend toward being 2.7 times more likely to be classified as C1 (OR = 2.67; 95% CI, 0.99–7.19; P = 0.051), although this result did not reach statistical significance.
Education was almost significant between the two groups ( p = 0.051), with most mothers with university degrees choosing to give birth in private hospitals, although the difference did not reach statistical significance.
This effect remained significant for r = 0.9 (SMD = 0.52, p = 0.032) or almost significant for 0.5 (SMD = 0.26, p = 0.051), but differences did not reach statistical significance for r =0.2 (SMD = 0.21, p = 0.112).
a trend towards significanceP = .051
Specifically, a significant increase in male overall SSB consumption trends over the 16 year time period was observed ( P = .048 for trend analysis); although the differences in male overall SSB consumption between NHANES III versus NHANES 1999–2004 did not reach statistical significance when the data were analyzed in aggregate, the analysis suggested a trend towards significance ( P = .051).
In addition, pre-menopausal women with obesity showed a significantly higher chance to have an intermediate chronotype (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.28–3.83; p = 0.004), whereas post-menopausal women with obesity showed a trend to have a higher morning chronotype (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 0.98–2.06; p = 0.051), although this did not reach statistical significance.
showed a trendp=0.051
Although the difference did not reach statistical significance, bevacizumab showed a trend toward improved survival (p=0.051, Figure 5B ).
However, the post-hoc tests concerning the comparison of the groups with respect to body mass did not reach statistical significance although the difference between naMCI and HC was marginally non-significant (W ( n naMCI = 21, n HC = 27) = −3.310, p = 0.051).
showed a trendp = 0.051
In contrast, although patients with high miR-1321 expression showed a trend towards decreased overall survival, this association did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.051), Overall, these findings indicate that increased expression of specific miRNAs is associated with unfavorable prognoses in glioma patients ( Figure 5 ). 4.
showed a trendp = 0.051
Alcohol use showed a trend toward higher risk that did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.00–3.55; p = 0.051).
Although there was a clear trend for better survival in group M0 in the overall comparison with the log rank test, the result marginally did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.051).
Comparing the STAI scores in study subjects and controls, results on both subscales (STAI-S and STAI-T) were higher in the study group; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance, although the results of STAI-S scores were marginally significant ( P = 0.051).