“highly significant”

All t values were highly significant ( P <.001).

Although all these paths were highly significant (P<0.001), the effect sizes were not impressive.

By providing the beetles with larvae of different ages (and sizes), we revealed a highly significant effect of larval age on the number of larvae killed by the beetles (3-way ANOVA, F = 234.8, P < 0.001), with a steep decrease in this number for larvae older than about 90 ADD ( Figure 8A ).

The revealed highly significant P < 0.001 for all within-group comparisons, including total QOL, mental health, and self-esteem from baseline to intermediate time points, and from baseline to the final time point.

Differences were considered significant at * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 or were considered highly significant at *** P < 0.001.

3.4 Predictors of high BP among the study population The univariate analysis shows highly significant ( P < .001) association for most of the risk factors of high BP (Table S1 ).

The effect of hydrogen peroxide on the “fraction of fluorescence signal outside of the pyrenoid” was highly significant (P<.001), and we thank the reviewer for their suggestion.

These three percentages were highly significantly different (χ 2 = 19.7; P < 0.001), with a highly significant linear trend ( P < 0.001).

CKO mice also exhibited a lower VO 2 ( p = 0.04) but without a significant difference in VCO 2 ( p = 0.348), yet with a highly significant increase in RER ( p < 0.001).

Moreover heterogeneity across the studies was found to be highly significant (p<0.001, I 2 = 95%).

As seen in Figure-3 oncological outcome differed highly significant between cN0 organ-confined, cN0 locally advanced, low-risk and high-risk group (p <0.001).

Overall, a more than 50% reduction in seizure episodes was achieved in 178 (56.3%) patients at day 90, and less than 50% reduction in seizure episodes was achieved by 95 (26.8%) patients on Day 14, with a highly significant association between them (p<0.001).

This class had a strong preference for IPC knowledge and awareness training, with the coefficient of the person factor (better IPC knowledge and awareness training) being highly significant ( β = 3.767, P < 0.001) while the coefficients for other factors were not significant.

These changes represented about 20% and 40% rises relative to the pre-dialysis and pre-reinfusion PAP values, respectively, and were highly significant relative to baseline ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

MHco3/18.F 1 observed heterozygote frequency of 15 (13.6 expected according to HWE) at codon 167 was not significant but at codon 200 was highly significant (χ 2 = 66.47, p < 0.001) with 77 observed heterozygotes (40 expected).

The results showed that there was a highly significant similarity in the HO-WE, HO-SU, and WE-SU groups ( p < 0.001), a significant similarity in the HO-WF, HO-PR, WF-PR, and WF-WE ( p < 0.05), and no significances in other groups ( p > 0.05).

There was a highly significant correlation between HbA1c and FPG, as shown in Figure 1 (r 2 =0.86; P <0.001).

Regression Model and Variance Analysis The analysis of variance ( Table 4 ) revealed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating its strong statistical significance.

Even after controlling for the state fixed effects, the positive effect of the peer score—the average transparency score of all other hospitals in the same HRR—remained highly significant (0.42; P < 0.001).

RM-ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of session, F (19, 285) = 37.18, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.71, which reflected a significant linear increase, F (1, 15) = 81.01, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.84, and a significant quadratic pattern, F (1, 15) = 11.30, p = .004, η p 2 = 0.43. 3.2 Transfer task performance Table 2 shows the score on each of the outcome measures, separately for each group and assessment session.

We validated the reliability of RNA-seq data by qRT-PCR detection of 18 randomly selected up- and downregulated DEGs using gene-specific primers ( Supplementary Table S1 ), showing a highly significant correlation (R 2 = 0.9776, p < 0.001) between the results of RNA-seq and qRT-PCR ( Figure 5 B,C).

DMRs in SAS fish were twice as frequently hypo-methylated relative to wild fish than hyper-methylated and this difference was highly significant (68%: 193/284 hypo-DMRs; 32%: 91/284 hyper-DMRs; binomial P -value < 0.001).

The model is as follows: Survival ~ sex + ( 1 | patRIL ) + ( 1 | RIL : vial ) + ( 1 | RIL : sex ) + ( 1 | group ) + ( 1 | set : group ) The fixed effect of sex was highly significant ( z = −8.0, P < 0.001).

Thus, we observed weak enrichment of strain-specific variants at sex-biased CREs when considering the full eQTL regions, but found a highly significant, 2.5-fold enrichment within intra-TAD intervals (p<0.001 for intra-TAD interval variants vs p = 0.278 genome-wide).

The CD4 depletion remained highly significant in the duodenum of virally suppressed participants ( P < 0.001), but it was less pronounced in the colon and no longer reached statistical significance ( P = 0.1).