When new masculinity was pulled into the model, masculinity stress remained highly significant ( B = 0.39, SE = 0.095, Wald = 16.53, p < 0.001), and new masculinity accounted for significant variance ( B = 0.33, SE = 0.165, Wald = 3.97, p = 0.046).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
A highly significant reduction in activation time for both BF muscles was found ( p < 0.001).
Propionic acid was less abundant than butyric acid in both animal-diet ( F = 0.3, P = 0.62, non-significant) and plant-diet ( F = 47.8, P < 0.001, highly significant) samples.
Dosing with arginine dentifrice was associated with highly significant ( P < 0.001) increases in plaque pH ( Fig. 10 ), which is notable in terms of previous human volunteer studies demonstrating a significant anticaries effect.
This analysis confirms the previous results: The value-based model fits better than the association-based model both for error rates (median R 2 values are.34 and.21, respectively, and the difference is highly significant, T = 0, p <.001, tested with paired Wilcoxon test, where R 2 values are handled as ordinal variables) and for reaction times (median R 2 values are.53 and.39, T = 0, p <.001).
1B ] in healthy controls (2.8 log IU/L, range: 1.5–4 log IU/L) and HIV-1 infected children (median 1.9 log IU/L, range: 0.1–3.5 log IU/L); the difference between the groups at this time point was also highly significant (P < 0.001).
Statistical analysis For data in Figs 3A(ii), B(ii) , 4B and C , non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis) tests revealed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001).
The total effect of Reciprocity on Intention was highly significant ( β = .35, p < .001), demonstrating that Reciprocity exerts both direct and indirect influences.
Lastly, exploring habitat use in relation to the percentage of tree canopy cover/closure between the morphs, we found a highly significant interaction between male morph type and the percentage of tree cover (χ 2 1 = 87.33, P < 0.001).
This decrease in Lp(a) levels of 39.6% was highly significant ( P ≤0.001).
The mean phenotypic differences between the HIGH and LOW groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The highly significant was labeled as (***) where p < 0.001, more significant (**) where p < 0.01 and significant (*) where p < 0.05 compared with corresponding control group without U0126; (^^^) where p < 0.001, more significant (^^) where p < 0.01 compared with corresponding FSK or DBT group without U0126, respectively.
Our study included a total of 630 individuals, among which 196 were parasitized (31.11 %), including 507 Mullus barbatus with 138 parasitized individuals (27.22 %) and 123 Mullus surmuletus with 58 parasitized individuals (47.15 %); the Chi-square test (χ 2 =18.355) allowed us to detect a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) between the prevalence of parasitism according to the host species, that is to say M. surmuletus is more parasitized than M. barbatus with a higher prevalence.
The pairwise Mahalanobis distances of wing shape showed highly significant differences between species and sexes of the flies ( p < 0.001), ranging from 7.00 (male and female H. aberrans ) to 14.57 (male H. saguinolenta and female H. aberrans ) ( Table 3 ).
This change is highly significant ( p = .001).
As displayed in Table 3 , serum IL-18 levels were significantly greater in patients with AS (median of 235.7060, range (23-485.78)) compared to HC (median 151.10, range (102.04-250.19)), with highly significant variations (p < 0.001).
Results: An intragroup comparison of staining intensity and staining location for OED showed a highly significant difference between mild and moderate grade ( P < 0.001).
In the Lanzhou region, the mean growing-season temperature rose by 0.57°C per decade and accumulated temperature above 0°C increased by 103.74°C per decade, both at highly significant levels ( p < 0.001).
This test showed that the difference between the MISI diff values ( M = 30.44, SD = 19.83) and zero was highly significant, t (17) = 6.51, P < 0.001, 95% CI 20.58, 40.31.
At 6 h postoperatively, ESPB group also reported markedly lower pain scores (2.13 ± 2.13) compared with GA group (4.53 ± 1.25), a difference that was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
When comparing TAC values between the two groups, the TAC value of the control group was higher in all age-groups which is highly significant with a P value of <0.001.
The relation between the expected cation exchange capacity (CEC) of the soil at a tree ́s growth site and estimated seed production was not significant according to our GLMM, but nonetheless yielded a highly significant positive Spearman correlation coefficient (p<<0.001; S2 Fig ).
A highly significant ( P < 0.001) increase in the LDH release is observed in groups treated with 10 μg/mL FU-HfO 2 and PEG-HfO 2 with a somewhat significant ( P < 0.01) increase in those treated with 10 μg/mL HfO 2 and 5 μg/mL PEG-HfO 2 .
We found highly significant relationships for both the IBC (r = 0.65, p < 0.001) and IBD model (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) (Fig. 4a,b ).
Results GC Caviton showed least microleakage and least water absorption followed by IRM and Cavit G, the differences were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) and there was no statistical difference found in all the groups with respect to solubility.