“highly significant”

We found a highly significant spatial correlation between Malat1 foci and both Mlxipl (α = 0.178, p < 1e−15) and Nlrp6 (α = 0.175 ± 0.012, p < 1e−15; Figure S4 ).

This revealed a highly significant association between the risk scores and the survival of the patients (Figure 2C ; log rank test P < 10 −15 ).

The Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference among groups ( H = 10,029.68, p < 1 × 10 −15 ).

picta as indicated by the highly significant logistic regression of male proportion against wCTUs (Z = −15.15, P < 1 × 10 −15 ) (Fig. 3c ).

While there is a highly significant correlation between PC1 for both methods ( R 2 = 0.949, p < 1 × 10 −15 ), later PCs are often not significantly correlated, with the most notable exception being EFD PC2 and PH PC3 ( R 2 = 0.432, p < 1 × 10 −15 ), although several other PCs also show weak correlations.

1 B, Tables 1 and S1 , supporting information), a highly significant enrichment given that this region made up only 6% of the mapped assembly ( χ 2 test, χ d . f . = 1 2 = 338 815, P < 10 − 15 ; see Fig.

Log-rank tests of both the P cohort versus the p cohort and the P cohort versus all deaths showed highly significant differences ( P <10 −15 and P <10 −6 , respectively), and the p cohort is also significantly different ( P =10 −3 ) from the cohort of all deaths.

Analysis of the number of crystal packets among the studied species revealed highly significant differences in their frequency of occurrence (ANOVA, p < 10 − 15 ).

As further validation, we constructed a linear model with expression divergence as the dependent variable, and the 11 tested factors and d N as explanatory variables; d N remained highly significant in this analysis ( P < 10 − 15 ).

We find a highly significant negative correlation between the two measures (linear regression: R 2 =0.34, P <10 –15 ), which is illustrated in Fig. 4 .

A t -test between the UTR lengths in the “average fold-change” group and the “high fold-change” group was highly significant, with a p -value < 10 −15 .

The differences in median PEN MICs were highly significant ( P < 1 × 10 −15 for all pair-wise comparisons by Mann-Whitney U test).

Of the 197 DM loci between L-iPSCs and F-iPSCs, 133 loci were also DM between LCLs and fibroblasts (a highly significant overlap ; χ 2 test; P < 10 −15 ).

The optimal values of a = 0 and b = 4,790 resulted in a highly significant model fit ( F = 44.94, df = 4, 51, P < 10 –15 ) with an r 2 value of 0.78, and the selected regions overlap the ddPCR probe locations ( figs. 1 and 2 ).

The difference between means of A and B is highly significant ( P -value < 10 −15 ; two-sided Student's t -test).

This is clear from gene ontology (GO) analysis of the genes associated with HOT regions: Categories such as ‘metabolic process’ and ‘cellular component biogenesis’ are highly significant (both P < 10 −15 ).

4 ), and this difference is highly significant (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P < 10 − 15 ).

As previously noted, a larger proportion of pairs have a TMRCA under 8 months in Sheffield relative to London (24% versus 4%), and overall the London pairs have an average TMRCA of 4.4 years compared to 1.5 years for the Sheffield pairs, with the difference being highly significant (KWT, P < 1 × 10 −15 ).

A multivariate test of differences between SLE and control subjects based on the first six PCs was highly significant (p < 10 −15 ), as was the test based on only the first PC (p < 10 −15 ).

Shapiro-Wilks tests of Normality were highly significant ( p < 10 −15 ) for both groups, and so measures of means and variances were not appropriate characterizations of the distributions.

The difference in LAMconcentration between the cases and controls was highly significant [ P < 1 × 10 −15 , n = 101, Wilcoxon signed-rank test; difference in location estimate, −247.318; 95% confidence interval (CI), −351.3 to 200.8; Fig. 3 ].

First, they represent a consistent and highly significant (Wilcoxon test P < 10 −15 in all growth phases except LS) decrease in expression across hundreds of rpoS regulated genes, in all five growth phases.

2 ), the global model was also highly significant (P < 10 −15 ) and explained 64.4% of the total deviance.

One-sided Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests (paired by subject and parcel) confirmed that these differences were highly significant ( p < 10 −15 ) across all comparisons, with SA consistently outperforming P3 and P3MT.

At 2 hpi, highly significant ρ values of 0.68 ( P < 1.0 × 10 −15 ) and 0.67 ( P < 1.0 × 10 −15 ) were observed for the MAP-infected and control sample groups, respectively.