“highly significant”

This showed a highly significant, medium-sized correlation r(204) = 0.326, p < 0.001.

Regarding the correlation of DPPH with hydroxycinnamic acids, this was highlighted by the existence of highly significant correlations ( p < 0.001) with four of these compounds, namely, 11 , 13 , 15 , and 24 ( r = 0.866, 0.870, 0.899, and 0.852, respectively), all of them assigned as acetyl- p -coumaroylsucrose derivatives; strongly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) with three of them, namely, 3, 5, and 7 ( r = 0.776, 0.845, and 0.837, respectively); and significant correlations ( p < 0.05) with compounds 2, 12, 14, and 22 ( r = 0.689, 0.691, 0.708, and 0.645, respectively).

In the program testing, universal genetic codes, the HKY85 evolution model and 31 quantitative biochemical properties were used to estimate adaptive selection (referred to as positive destabilizing selection, when the frequency of changes in magnitude categories 6, 7 and 8 were highly significant, z-scores > 3.09 and P < 0.001).

Most notably, co-treatment of HepG2 cells with [Ru(nta) 2 ] 3− (60 μM) and Fe 2 Tf (30 μM) resulted in a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in cellular Ru levels at a very low level of Ru–protein binding (condition B8 in Table 3 ).

Among distant regions highly significant correlations are shown by PP2 and EXT (R = 0.90, p = 0.001) ( Figure 3 a).

Considering all ingested food including permitted additional snacks, a highly significant reduction of SAA (methionine and cysteine) intake by 77% was achieved in the LowS group as compared with the CG ( P <0.001).

However, the interaction effect turned out to be highly significant [ F (1,15) = 18.74, p = 0.001, η_p^2 = 0.55].

Within-group analysis showed the IG achieved highly significant longitudinal improvements in pain and psychological discomfort (all p < 0.001).

For canonical word order, there was no effect of ROI (β = −14.41, se = 18.64, t = −0.77, ns), whereas there was a highly significant effect of ROI for scrambled word order (β = −140.95, se = 18.64, t = −7.56, p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis showed that the improvement was highly significant for TBLB at Center A and C (both p < 0.001), as well as for CNB at Center A ( p = 0.0039), Center B ( p = 0.0313), and Center C ( p < 0.001).

The model began with an intercept of 8.892, which was highly significant (p < .001).

In addition to the significance value ( p < 0.05, * significant; p < 0.01; ** highly significant; p < 0.001, *** highly significant), the effect sizes for all ANOVAs were indicated using the partial eta 2 .

Furthermore, the results ( Table 2 ) showed that the two-way interaction of variety and storage time had a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.001) on the L* value and a significant effect ( p < 0.05) on the b value of fresh-cut pineapple, and the main effect of variety on the L* and b values of fresh-cut pineapple was the largest.

Comparing the results obtained in this study with those of Schlup and Brunner, the difference between the values of the means relating to the first four arguments (sustainability, health, price, and taste) were highly significant ( p < 0.001) [ 23 ].

Furthermore, MoCA-InA scores demonstrated highly significant positive correlations with CSF Aβ42 concentrations (r = 0.720, p < 0.001), right Hippocampus VICV (r = 0.703, p < 0.001), and right PCC VICV (r = 0.695, p < 0.001).

It was found that sex was a statistically significant parameter of the health-related quality of life and, specifically, the coefficient of sex was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all the estimations.

The multimodal model also outperformed the CoMPARA consensus model (0.89 ± 0.014), representing a highly significant improvement ( p < 0.001).

The model fit the data well ( χ 2 / df = 5.34, RMSEA = 0.06, CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.96, SRMR = 0.05), and all the factor loadings were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Genotype, treatment, and genotype × treatment (G × T) effects were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for SFW, SDW, and PH, while Chl b was significant at p < 0.01 for genotype, while treatment was significant at p < 0.5.

The interaction between lockdown and trauma was statistically highly significant, with examinations performed on trauma patients decreasing more than the others ( p < 0.001).

Estimated genetic differentiation (G ST ) at locus level varied from 0.67 (for SLR20) to 0.89 (for TomSatX11-1), with a mean of 0.77, and was highly significant at all loci ( p = 0.001) ( Table 2 ). 3.2.

This difference was highly significant in all of the subgroups ( p < 0.001) ( Table 1 and Table S3 ).

Significant differences are indicated using the standard Michelin Guide scale ( P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant; P < 0.001, extremely significant).

We found a highly significant increase in PI3K pathway signaling from CAH to EEC grade 1 (p<0.001).

As shown in Section 3.4 , multivariable regression adjusting for these confounders reveals a highly significant association (desert IRR = 1.425; p < 0.001 ).