Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP value = 6.6 × 10 −130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For example, we found highly significant functional enrichment among the interacting partners for the GO terms “cytoskeleton” (P value = 6.6 × 10 −13 ), “TFIID complex” (P value = 1 × 10 −14 ), and “proteasome” (P value = 6.6 × 10 −13 ) ( Haarer et al. 2011 ).
highly significantp -value = 7.78 × 10− 130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The ANOVA results revealed highly significant differences among treatments for both Tret1 ( p -value = 7.78 × 10− 13 ) and Tret1-like ( p -value = 1.32 × 10− 13 ), both far below 0.0001 significance p- value threshold, indicating that exposure to insecticides and acetone markedly affected gene expression.
highly significantP < 8 × 10 −130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Sylamer analysis using all 7-nt motifs complementary to seed regions of mouse miRNAs revealed a highly significant (P < 8 × 10 −13 ; Bonferroni corrected < 7 × 10 −10 ) enrichment for the 7-nt seed match of miR-451 (AACGGTT) in the 3′ UTRs of genes in a cohort of 588 genes, most of which were up-regulated in miR144/451 −/− erythroid precursors ( Fig. 4 B ).
highly significantp -value = 0.000000000000880.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the death rate was 34% in co-infected ( n = 170) compared to non-co-infected patients ( n = 128), indicating a highly significant value ( p -value = 0.00000000000088).
highly significantp = 8.8E-130.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We observed that the tumor types with highly significant KDM7A-DT gain and amplification were highly aggressive, including hepatocellular carcinoma ( p = 8.8E-13), pilocytic astrocytoma ( p = 3.43E-10), melanoma ( p = 5.21E-10), prostate adenocarcinoma ( p = 5.16E-08), medulloblastoma ( p = 4.20E-07), and colorectal carcinoma ( p = 6.14E-04).
highly significantp<1×10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The TPT main effect was highly significant regardless of the data set used (full data set: F 10,370 = 37.6, p<1×10 −12 ; limited data set: F 10,370 = 30.7, p<1×10 −12 ), clearly indicating the significance of the online compensatory adjustments of F1 in response to the AF perturbations when the data were collapsed across the two groups of subjects.
highly significantP < 10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When we applied Fisher's exact test to gene sets identified by the different approaches ( Supplemental Figure S3A–C ), we always found highly significant overlap (more genes in common than expected by chance) between the SB Driver Analysis and GKC analysis methods ( P < 10 −12 ).