“highly significant”

Among all investigated factors, age group showed a highly significant global effect ( p < 0.001) and a significant interaction with time (pint < 0.001), as shown in Figure 3 A.

Within the erosion/abrasion groups, Welch’s ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among materials, with effect F (4, 19.24) = 929.25 ( p < 0.001).

The analyses of renal function as a relevant influencing factor showed highly significant correlations between eGFR and radioactivity concentration across the entire cohort ( p < 0.001 and R 2 = 0.76); a higher eGFR correlated with lower radioactivity concentrations in the blood samples.

Serum Amyloid A (SAA) The two-way mixed ANOVA revealed a highly significant Group × Time interaction for SAA (F 2 , 46 = 8.76, p < 0.001), indicating that the temporal pattern of SAA differed between the gallop and endurance groups ( Figure 1 ).

Consequently, Saccharomyces cerevisiae uniquely achieved highly significant ( p < 0.001) antioxidant improvements, whereas other strains showed moderate or non-significant responses despite high Se yields.

The non-parametric Mann–Kendall test yielded a highly significant monotonic decrease ( z = −9.03, τ = −0.282, p < 0.001).

reported a highly significant improvement in the Boston Naming Test (BNT, pre-treatment: 20.75 ± 4.49, post-treatment: 22.75 ± 4.28, p < 0.001) [ 41 ].

Age Differences Between Diagnostic Groups Age differed markedly across the four main diagnostic categories; the global comparison showed a highly significant difference in age between groups (Kruskal–Wallis H(3) = 45.0, p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

Specifically, 90% of the total molecular variance was attributed to differences among accessions, whereas only 10% was explained by variation within accessions, with both components being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Assessment of DAI revealed that treatment with HVs@HA-BR-KDEL resulted in a highly significant reduction ( P < 0.001 versus model; Fig. 6C ), whereas siRNA-OMVs induced a moderate but significant alleviation of symptoms ( P < 0.05 versus model; fig.

One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant overall difference in TyG index values across the three groups ( p < 0.001), and Bonferroni-corrected post hoc analyses confirmed that all pairwise comparisons were statistically significant, indicating a consistent increase in TyG levels with advancing steatosis severity ( Table 4 ).

The pre-operative Lüscher score (4.8 ± 1.8) was found to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared to the post-operative Lüscher score (4.0 ± 1.7) [ Table 2 ; Figure 1 ].

Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 5856.148, df = 190, p < 0.001), confirming that correlations among items were sufficiently large to warrant factor extraction.

Case 8 showed highly significant changes ( p < 0.001) in size-related parameters (nuclear area, equivalent diameter, and circumference) and density measures, except for the area and diameter between the second and third recurrence ( Figure 7 a).

The results confirmed a highly significant difference in bacterial viability between untreated controls (6.0 Log 10 CFU/mL) and oleogel treatments (≈4.0 Log 10 CFU/mL), with an F-value of 1132.00 and a p -value < 0.001.

As shown in Supplemental Table S1B and the corresponding forest plot ( Supplemental Figure S1C ), the signature remained a highly significant independent predictor ( p < 0.001) with a high odds ratio when adjusting for prior systemic therapy, IMDC risk category, and the presence of sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features.

After adjusting for confounding variables in the multivariate model, both factors remained highly significant ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.014, respectively).

For the FRAP assay, a positive and highly significant correlation was observed (r 2 = 0.9869, p < 0.001).

The subsequent GARCH(1,1) estimation yielded a highly significant persistence parameter (β = 0.9483, p < 0.001) and a sum of coefficients (α + β = 0.985) close to unity.

Paired comparison demonstrated a highly significant reduction in time with the use of AI (t = −15.37, p < 0.001).

Participants who reported occasional insomnia had an adjusted odds ratio of 3.51, while those with habitual insomnia reached an odds ratio of 5.42, both highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Results Repeated-measure multivariate ANOVA confirmed a highly significant main effect of time for all noxious conditions ( P <.001; 46 °C: t 533 =27.69).

Sentinel-2 exhibited the highest correlation ( r = 0.46) with high statistical significance ( p < 0.001), followed by Landsat-8 which has 0.42 correlation with highly significant value ( p < 0.001).

This initial association remained highly significant after adjustment for demographic characteristics in Model 2, though the effect size was modestly attenuated to an OR of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.17–1.75, P < 0.001), accompanied by a substantial improvement in model fit as evidenced by AIC reduction from 4523.6 to 3842.5.

These changes represented large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 3.43 and 3.36), and both differences were highly significant ( P < .001).