Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 10 -110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The effect of set size was also highly significant [ F (2,54) = 73.84, p < 10 -11 , η p 2 = 0.73], showing that the Mooney face targets were not searched efficiently.
Visual Search of Mooney Faces.
Front Psychol · 2016 · PMC4751287
highly significantP < 10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The preponderance of significant negative correlations with ORF length among eukaryotes is itself highly significant, for both 5′-mRNA folding energy (binomial P < 10 −11 ) and 5′-CAI (binomial P < 10 −9 )—suggesting a systematic eukaryotic trend toward faster translation initiation and faster early elongation in short versus long genes.
highly significantp < 1 × 10 –110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
8 b) and had highly significant enrichment of interactions between them (STRING: expected number of edges: 5; number of edges: 28; PPI enrichment p-value: ****p < 1 × 10 –11 ) , while random samples of 43 peaks from either all GWAS ALS genes or from all epiChromALS peaks showed no functional enrichment, suggesting a mechanistic link between these genes, neuronal development/function, and epigenetic mechanisms.
highly significantp< 10 - 110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Expanding the observation to cells that showed morphological changes, including elongation, that preceded divisions, another 87 cells appeared to be preparing for division in aggregates while none of the isolated cells showed any shape change, which was a highly significant difference (24.3% vs 0%, two-sided p< 10 - 11).
highly significantp < 10 −110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A generalized linear regression model with output SRT benefit modeled just from avREOIG (i.e., SRT benefit ∼ 1+ avREOIG) showed both intercept ( p < 10 −22 ) and avREOIG ( p < 10 −11 ) to be highly significant factors with an overall r 2 = 0.371 ( p < 10 −11 ), that is, 37.1% explained variance.