Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 7.66 × 10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Individual MMR Gene and Combined dMMR Survival Analysis A six-group log-rank analysis comparing MLH1 -mutant ( n = 18; 2 events, 11%), MSH2 -mutant ( n = 27; 1 event, 4%), MSH6 -mutant ( n = 46; 6 events, 13%), PMS2 -mutant ( n = 12; 1 event, 8%), POLE -mutant ( n = 63; 4 events, 6%), and TP53 -mutant ( n = 880; 373 events, 42%) subgroups demonstrated highly significant OS differences (log-rank p = 7.66 × 10 −12 ; Table 2 , Figure 3 ).
highly significantp = 8 × 10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A paired t test on measurements at 0.8 and 2.0 m above the ground for all PDT deployments less than 5 m from the kerbside (a working definition of ‘roadside’ for local air quality assessment (Defra 2009 )) demonstrated highly significant evidence for a difference in NO 2 concentration between the two heights ( p = 8 × 10 −12 , n = 84, Table 1 ).
highly significantP = 9 × 10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although highly significant (one-sided Pearson P = 9 × 10 −12 for RSA and P = 2 × 10 −4 for DTL), the magnitude that ns-polymorphism distributions shift with respect to DTL and RSA was subtle: Across samples, the mean DTL of ns-polymorphism varied by less than 1 Å, and the mean RSA varied between 0.34 and 0.38.
highly significantp = 9.04 × 10 −120.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Interaction of the proteins from the protein-coding genes seen in Figure S2 revealed a highly significant network ( p = 9.04 × 10 −12 ) with 76 connections, an average node degree of 2.53, an average local clustering coefficient of 0.382, and a maximum interaction score of 0.50.
highly significantp< 10 - 110.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Expanding the observation to cells that showed morphological changes, including elongation, that preceded divisions, another 87 cells appeared to be preparing for division in aggregates while none of the isolated cells showed any shape change, which was a highly significant difference (24.3% vs 0%, two-sided p< 10 - 11).