We found that deep location was a highly significant risk factor, as such patients were 1.919 times more likely to experience subsequent metastasis (95% CI: 1.323–2.783, P = .001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The 3-way interaction between “group” (i.e., strength of inversion sensitivity in LDT task) x presentation orientation x length remained highly significant and even stronger (t = 6.12, p < .001).
Student’s t -test indicated differences in mutation accumulation between allelic variants of sexual accessions as compared with facultative or obligate apomictics for less than half of the genes ( P < 0.05), whereas highly significant differences were observed between the mutation accumulation of VASL alleles as compared with any other gene tested within sexual accessions ( P < 0.001).
Results We found a highly significant and strong positive linear relationship between dose and response around 100 MU: r (3) = 1.0, p <.001 (see Fig. 1 a).
There was a highly significant lowering of IOP in the first postoperative week, after 1 month, and after 1 year ( P =0.001).
While the percentage of single participants was not significantly different between cases and controls, a highly significant difference ( P < . 001) was found when diagnostic groups were considered: single were 92.7% of schizophrenic patients, 78.4% of personality disorders, and 79.8% of other diagnoses.
Separate analyses, performed on different diagnostic groups, revealed an important and highly significant reduction (−55%) in admission rates for affective disorders ( p < 0.001); on the other hand, the decrease in admission rates observed for schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), personality disorders, and substance use disorders did not reach statistical significance (possibly because the sample size for these diagnoses was not large enough).
The interaction effect trigger (virtual vs regular AddHRVr) by time (before intervention vs after intervention) was highly significant (b=0.08; P <.001; Multimedia Appendix 4 ), indicating that RMSSD increased more strongly following AddHRVr triggers with the intervention (relative to before intervention) than following virtual AddHRVr triggers.
A highly significant association was found between the type of diabetes therapy and the duration of diabetes (p < 0.001), as presented in Table 2 .
Diclofenac, a potent analgesic compound, produced highly significant ( P < 0.001) effect on writhing in doses of 1 mg/kg, i.p.
indica showed highly significant association with soil type ( χ 2 (10, N = 478) = 103.2, p < 0.001).
A highly significant statistical difference existed between the 2 groups in relation to the acceptance of color ( P < 0.001) and child's satisfaction ( P < 0.001).
The effect of hip status at screening was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for both life and veterinary claims related to HD in all five breeds with an increased hazard ratio (HR) for deteriorating hip status being graded 2–4 [up to year 2000 or later D–E (moderate–severe HD)] as compared with 0 and 1 [up to year 2000 or later A–C (normal hip joints–mild dysplasia)].
The basis for these calculations, a db‐RDA model on the full rank distance‐based matrix of fungal relative abundance with the selected set of environmental variables, was highly significant (ANOVA like test, p < 0.001, Figure S2A ).
It should also be noted that this same trend was seen in Experiment 1 – that is, the group of Experiment 1 participants with the most liberal criterion for responding uncertain were the RB responders in the II condition. During the last 150 trials of the experiment, participants best fit by an RB model responded “uncertain” more frequently (M = 63.2, SD = 35.2) than those best fit by an II model (M = 12.8, SD = 15.2), and this difference was highly significant [ t (24) = 5.13, p < .001].
Despite a trend for a global treatment effect, IGF levels were not significantly different between the three groups whatever the photoperiod ( p = 0.078). Highly significant differences in testis size (Fig. 7a ) and testosterone levels (Fig. 7b ) occurred between each photoperiod ( p < 0.001) but treatment did not affect these parameters ( p = 0.726 and p = 0.203, respectively).
Given that highly significant correlations ( r = .69, p < .001) and similar results for the bilateral putamen were found, we used the average rGMD of the bilateral putamen in subsequent analyses. 3.2.
The prognostic score combining these two factors is highly significant ( p = 0.001) (Fig. 2 ).
H1N1 given 48 h prior to SARS-CoV-2 almost completely abrogated SARS-CoV-2-typical weight loss in both sexes, beginning at 2 dpi, and increasing to highly significant protection ( p < 0.001) from 5 dpi onwards.
All path coefficients (direct effects), except between Psychological distress and Pain intensity ( p = 0.054), were highly significant (all other p -values <0.001).
Although F IS still tends to be positive, the values obtained were, in most cases, not significant. Genetic differentiation The overall genetic differentiation at the nuclear microsatellite loci was relatively moderate ( F ST =0.069), and highly significant ( P <0.001).
The results of ABTS ̇ + radical scavenging activity showed a highly significant ( P < 0.001), very strong correlation with total flavonoid content ( r = 0.943), and a non-significant moderate correlation with total phenolics content ( r = 0.625), indicating that flavonoids may contribute more significantly to the observed antioxidant activity in Pulicaria species than phenolics. 3.5.
In contrast, obesity (BMI: 27.5-37.5 kg/m 2 ) was even more prevalent among 68 (52%) female cases in comparison to 6 (12%) female controls, and frequency distribution of BMI was highly significant ( p < 0.001) among them.
Confirmatory analyses The ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of age-group, F (1, 95) = 11.08, p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.10, indicating that older children engaged in more helping behavior than younger children.
* Indicates significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05), ** indicates very significant differences ( p ≤ 0.01), and *** indicates highly significant differences ( p ≤ 0.001) compared with the negative control (lymphocytes without treatment), while § indicates significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) compared with the positive control (sodium arsenite).