“highly significant”

There was a highly significant correlation between HbA1c and FPG, as shown in Figure 1 (r 2 =0.86; P <0.001).

MHco3/18.F 1 observed heterozygote frequency of 15 (13.6 expected according to HWE) at codon 167 was not significant but at codon 200 was highly significant (χ 2 = 66.47, p < 0.001) with 77 observed heterozygotes (40 expected).

The overall regression model was highly significant according to ANOVA (p < 0.001), and the lack-of-fit test was non-significant (p > 0.05), confirming that the quadratic model adequately described the experimental data.

A highly significant trend for increased glioblastoma and meningioma tumors rates with advancing age at diagnosis was apparent ( P < 0.001).

Analysis of variance for each compound between and within each season showed highly significant differences between days and seasons (Friedman ANOVA, P < 0.001, Additional file 1 : Table S1 and Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Test, P < 0.0001, Additional file 1 : Table S2).

These changes represented about 20% and 40% rises relative to the pre-dialysis and pre-reinfusion PAP values, respectively, and were highly significant relative to baseline ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

Because our initial analyses revealed highly significant ( P <0.001) genotype x environment (G×E) interactions (data not shown), all subsequent analyses were performed separately by location.

Using the Mann-Whitney U-test, the comparison of IHC expression scores for SIX1 between PTC and ANCT revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), as illustrated in Fig. 1 .

The results showed that the BW showed highly significant differences across the four groups ( P < 0.001) ( Fig. 1 B ). 2 Analysis of Sequencing Data Through 16S rRNA gene sequencing of 120 samples, a total of 10,199,847 raw tags were generated.

As seen in Figure-3 oncological outcome differed highly significant between cN0 organ-confined, cN0 locally advanced, low-risk and high-risk group (p <0.001).

Frequency specific STNr LFP activity contributes to release reaction time and rate of force release A generalised linear model with normalised power in the theta/alpha, low beta and high gamma/high frequency (but not low gamma bands) during grip release was highly significant in explaining the variance in R-RT (likelihood ratio χ 2 = 20.229, df = 4, p < 0.001).

Moreover heterogeneity across the studies was found to be highly significant (p<0.001, I 2 = 95%).

Chi square test results revealed that the genotypic frequency varied highly significant (P < 0.001) when compared between Ischemic stroke patients and control group: Wild genotype (CC) was more common in cases while controls had more frequent polymorphic (TT) and heterozygous (CT) genotypes indicating that subjects wild genotype were more susceptible to develop Ischemic stroke.

Bindin population structure Population differentiation (Φ ST = 0.220) between Bamfield and Sandspit was strong and highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Highly significant correlations were found between G and P n in all treatments both in summer ( r from 0.79 to 0.86, P < 0.001) and winter ( r from 0.74 to 0.89, P < 0.001; Fig. 6 ).

A highly significant interaction between PD and GT for both Rbp6 and Aldh1a2 ( p < 0.001) resulted in variance across PDs only in DKO ( p < 0.001) but not WT male mice, with significant upregulation in DKO male mice at PD35, PD40, PD45 ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Table 2 ).

Phlorizin, phloretin, quercetin, epicatechin, and procyanidin B1 exhibited highly significant effects ( P < 0.001) for cultivar, part, and their interaction, indicating distinct accumulation patterns across both genetic and anatomical factors.

As observed in Table 2 , the differences encountered between the means on openness to change (OC) and self-transcendence (ST) before and after CME intervention were highly significant ( P <0.001) according to the values of the t tests.

CKO mice also exhibited a lower VO 2 ( p = 0.04) but without a significant difference in VCO 2 ( p = 0.348), yet with a highly significant increase in RER ( p < 0.001).

In the distal region, the effect of the scanner was highly significant ( p<0.001; η2 = 0.610 ).

These three percentages were highly significantly different (χ 2 = 19.7; P < 0.001), with a highly significant linear trend ( P < 0.001).

When loaded and non-loaded tibiae were compared in individual male mice, there was a highly significant difference in trabecular BV/TV (28.7%, p < 0.001) and Tb.Th (21.8%, p < 0.001).

Both estimators for α and β are highly significant (p < 0.001) 32 , and the mean pseudo-R 2 is 0.98 for the I p = 4 case and the I p = 10 case.

However, a highly significant interaction was demonstrated, F (1, 28) = 24.51; p < .001, indicating the no matter in which order the dyads took the experiment, individual sensitivity was significantly superior in the interactive versus noninteractive sessions; post hoc stats for interactive vs. noninteractive overall: t (29) = 5.01; p < .001; post hoc stats for int vs. nonint for I-NI group: t (15) = 2.91; p = .0107; post hoc stats for int versus nonint for NI-I group: t (13) = 4.55; p < .001.

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ2(28) = 920.3, p < 0.001), rejecting the null of an identity matrix and confirming that the data were suitable for factor analysis.