“highly significant”

The significance level was defined as follows: p ≥ 0.05 not significant, p < 0.05 significant, p < 0.01 highly significant and p < 0.001 most highly significant.

The difference between the urge in the two conditions was highly significant ( t (20) = -10.901, p < 0.001).

There were highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the sub‐themes in all five prioritized themes.

The chemical-genetic interaction of the positive control methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), a well-characterized antifungal agent that damages DNA [ 28 ], demonstrated a highly significant enrichment ( P value ≤ 0.001) for cellular response to DNA damage stimulus, confirming a successful HIP-HOP assay procedure and accurate post-sequencing data analysis.

For moisture, the p -values were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for Alaska pollock; p < 0.05 for golden threadfin bream and hairtail).

The correlation between pairwise distance and phonological overlap was highly significant (given the large number of word pairs: r = -.25, p < .001) and was strong even among words with 4 or fewer shared onset phonemes ( r = -.25, p < .001).

Conversely, the iodine and acid values were significant (p < 0.05) but saponification and ester values were higher and highly significant (p < 0.001) in native.

Results On comparing sialic acid levels among the three groups, stage 2 showed the highest mean (8.61) compared with the other two groups and was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Statistically significant results were denoted by a value of P < 0.05, while the results were considered highly significant when value of P < 0.001 was obtained.

However, we detected a highly significant correlation (r 2 = 0.834, p < 0.001) between Ucp3 and Coup-TFII levels in challenged animals.

The analysis also showed that these effects were interdependent: the interaction between the two factors was highly significant ( P < 0.001), and blocking UV decreased attack rates in sp items (with more eyespots) but increased attack rates in wt items (with fewer eyespots) ( Fig. 3 ).

For chronic NOEC REACH data (European Commission 2006), the relationship with the chronic high‐quality nonextrapolated SSD midpoint data was less strong than for the EC50 data but still highly significant (A; overlapping number of compounds 251, y = 0.7448 x + 0.8502, R 2 = 0.60, p < 0.001).

Results from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) in the US and Canada for Type 1 DM and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) for Type 2 DM demonstrate highly significant reductions (DCCT, p<0.001; UKPDS, p = 0.009) in the incidence and progression of retinopathy in patients randomized to tight blood glucose control (HbA1c <7%).

There was a highly significant correlation between the predicted and measured tumor cell fraction ( r = 0.81, p < 0.001) (Figure 4C ).

For evaluation of horizontal deviation, the manual PACT measurement and automated eye track system show a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.932, P < 0.001, Fig. 2 ).

In this study, the increase in Aβ42 levels in plasma samples from subjects with AD was highly significant ( P < 0.001), consistent with other IMR findings.

This result, that G-specific TAD borders were frequently positioned at G-specific compartment borders, was highly significant ( P < 0.001, two-sided Mann–Whitney U test; Fig. 5c ).

The balanced ANOSIM test inspecting whether changes in fg-LOFAs/diatom cell were driven by variations in diatom community composition highlighted highly significant differences (Global- R = 0.75, p < 0.001).

Education emerged as the most highly significant factor ( P <.001), with a positive coefficient (0.3113).

Survival outcome The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a highly significant difference in overall survival between the two surgical groups (p<0.001).

The hPEDF increase was highly significant in the 10,000 PEDF-SB group (p < 0.001) versus all injected eyes in tRPE cell and tIPE cell groups compared with saline ( Figures 2 H and 2I).

Two-way analysis of variance revealed significant main effects for both denture base material and tooth type, with a highly significant interaction effect (p < 0.001, η2p = 0.28).

There was a highly significant difference in both initial and final RRs between the two species (P < 0.001).

The criterion for statistical significance between the results of immunized and control groups were as follows: P < 0.05 was considered as significant, P < 0.01 was considered as highly significant, P < 0.001 was considered as very highly significant, and P > 0.05 was considered as nonsignificant. 4.

Specifically, we could demonstrate an inverse association with renal function as displayed by a highly significant correlations with the glomerular filtration rate of cystatin C (r = − 0.675, p < 0.001), cystatin C (r = 0.675, p < 0.001), creatinine (r = 0.629, p < 0.001) and urea (r = 0.623, p < 0.001) serum concentrations (Table 3 ), indicating renal clearance of MR-proANP [ 45 ].