“highly significant”

Interleukin-15 levels were significantly higher in physically active subjects as compared to sedentary during resting state (p = .037) and the difference became highly significant immediately after exercise (p = .002).

Nevertheless, the changes in the Fs-LASIK group are more predictable at 3 months postop, because the intergroup differences in the correlation coefficients for the J0 vector were highly significant (P=.002).

In a later analysis of a smaller ( n = 356) subsection of the cohort with more complete data (18% missing LA Z-scores), the hazard ratio was lower, 1.03, and not statistically significant (whereas in contrast maximal wall thickness Z-scores hazard ratio 1.07 remained highly significant, p = 0.002).

However, for T2-weighted imaging, we found a marked reduction in SI, most profound in temporal proximity to the IUT that then regressed with elapsed time, translating in a highly significant and strong correlation between SI and elapsed days ( r = 0.91, p = 0.002).

In both groups, the difference between the vitamin E and no-vitamin E groups was highly significant in the logrank test (P = 0.002).

Mentalizing categories The effect of mentalizing category was highly significant, F (2, 350) = 6.54, p = 0.002.

The significant interaction reflects that there was no significant difference between the reporting of the two modified motif types in the unfamiliar condition (p = 0.452, average response latencies for discriminating gap and noise motifs from the from the background of complete motifs were 1002 and 955 ms, respectively), whereas there was a highly significant difference in the response latencies for reporting the two modified motif types in the familiar condition (p = 0.002, average response latencies for discriminating gap and noise motifs from the from the background of complete motifs were 1219 and 1478 ms, respectively).

After long storage difference in the yield of IS and GA was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

Importantly, we discovered a trend for a negative association between the level of histological MF and serum CITP:MMP1 ratios in the cohort as a whole ( r = −0.18; p = 0.08), which could predominantly be attributed to the highly significant association in the classical LF‐LG AS group ( r = −0.62; p = 0.002) (Figure 1C,D ).

However, the quadratic model for TPC exhibited a highly significant lack‐of‐fit ( p = 0.002), indicating that the model did not adequately fit the experimental data (see Table S4 ).

However, the heat stressed colonies exhibited a highly significant 12% (light) and 11% (dark) decline in PQH 2 at the end of the experiment (at t = 17 d, mean = 78.9 ± 3.5% and 76.2 ± 5.1%; respectively; p < 0.002).

This relation became highly significant when removing two extremely ATO-resistant lung cancer cell lines from the regression analysis (r 2 = 0.82, p < 0.002) suggesting that NSCLC cell lines might be characterized by additional, tissue type-specific resistance mechanisms against ATO.

The correlations between MV centric radial motion fraction and adipose tissue quantifications and patient biology were highly significant between cMr R and BSA (r = −0.49, p = 0.002) and between cMr R and BMI (r = −0.44, p = 0.005).

While the mean of total MF densities was not statistically significant ( p = 0.0652), the improvement in the subpopulation of MFs with axon diameter between 2‐ and 4 μm was highly significant ( p < 0.002).

LDL Cholesterol The treatment effect was highly significant with a p = 0.002 and the diet order by treatment was not significant ( p = 0.2).

>30 weeks post-infection from these 8 RM were highly significant (p = 0.002 for all samples, p = 0.0006 for BM by two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests).

On statistical analysis, the duration of anastomosis was highly significant (p=0.002) (Figure 1 ).

Results MR images and dMRI revealed the development of a highly significant increase in BBB permeability (P < 0.002) and ventricle size (P < 0.0001) among infected rats.

The model demonstrated moderate discrimination with a concordance index of 0.667, and the overall likelihood-ratio test was highly significant (χ 2 = 19.4, p = 0.002). 3.8.

The difference in reduction of enuresis frequency between the groups was highly significant (p=0.002), but no difference was found between basic bladder advice and controls.

This difference was highly significant (not one of 500 random character deletion replicates had lower node recovery than the simulated fossilization aggregate, giving P = 0.002).

These differences, however, proved highly significant ( P < 0.002) in the subset of children reporting a family history of obesity.

T-tests on changes from baseline show that, at all time points throughout the study, the HDL/TC improvement from baseline was highly significant (p < 0.002).

Likewise, in the study by Liu et al., a highly significant difference was noted (P = 0.002) in the 8-year mortality rates between different age groups, with higher age groups showing increased mortality [ 11 ].

There was also a highly significant valence-by-salience interaction on FIC activity at reward outcome [ F (1, 32) = 11.353, P = 0.002].