“highly significant”

Nevertheless, the changes in the Fs-LASIK group are more predictable at 3 months postop, because the intergroup differences in the correlation coefficients for the J0 vector were highly significant (P=.002).

Anemia Among women, the trend over the 4 iron perception categories (none, a little, a medium amount, a lot) to anemia was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

Statistical analysis confirmed that this reduction in the number of tests compared to the pre-pandemic period was highly significant ( p = 0.002).

In our previous studies (1) 12 twin pairs analyzed (gut microbial profiling) using PLS-DA showed highly significant correlations between pairs ( 53 ) and (2) examination of 136 samples from 32 patients ( n = 20 NEC or LOS) showed significant differences ( p = 0.002) in microbiomic patterns between diseased and healthy individuals ( 24 ).

Prehistoric fish were always bigger than contemporary Atlantic salmon and brown trout ( figure 1 a ), with highly significant differences for 1-, 2- and 3-year-old fish despite the limited archaeological sample size ( t -tests>3.5, p <0.002 in all cases).

In contrast, indices I3 and I4 showed highly significant differences between the BM group and all other groups ( p ≤ 0.002), indicating reduced mineral content and altered mineral–matrix balance associated with this processing pathway.

4 represents a highly significant correlation ( R 2 =0.69, p =0.002), fitting the relationship: Malaria mortality rate = e [ ( PfPR × 0.6274 ) + 0.7023 ] An important area of uncertainty in malaria epidemiology is the ratio of malaria-specific mortality rates between children and adults.

The highly significant lower TT genotype was observed in male cases (4.8%) compared to that in male controls (13.7% Table 2 , TT vs CT: OR, 4.0, 95% CI, 1.646–9.720, P =0.002; TT vs CC: OR, 2.574, 95% CI, 1.063–6.237, P =0.018).

However, the heat stressed colonies exhibited a highly significant 12% (light) and 11% (dark) decline in PQH 2 at the end of the experiment (at t = 17 d, mean = 78.9 ± 3.5% and 76.2 ± 5.1%; respectively; p < 0.002).

In the Kaplan Meier survival analysis, the Logrank test was highly significant between group 1 and group 3 ( p = 0.002) and significant between group 2 and group 3 ( p = 0.038), but not significant between group 1 and group 2.

There was a highly significant reduction in tumour volume (median reduction 68.6 cm 3 ) after treatment ( P =0.002, Figure 1 ).

There is a weak positive intra-co-relation between ORA and IR, which is highly significant (ρ = 0.175; p = 0.002).

A highly significant correlation was found between DLQI and HECSI scores ( p = 0.002) (Fig. 1 a) and between TEWL and HECSI scores ( p = 0.034) (Fig. 1 b).

This analysis demonstrated that selection of the 80 genes best correlated with oxaliplatin-induced apoptosis produced the most accurate prediction, with a highly significant correlation ( r =0.53, P =0.002) between the observed and estimated response to oxaliplatin ( Figure 8B ).

Analysis of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) adherence revealed highly significant differences between the two approaches (standardized difference 1.40, 95% CI: 0.64, 2.15; p = 0.002; adjusted p < 0.001).

However, the highly significant correlation between root resorption and the presence of inclusion ( p value=0.002), in agreement with the literature, demonstrates a real risk of resorption in the case of inclusion of the maxillary canine.

Excitingly, independent from the association with age, we found a highly significant association (Kruskal–Wallis test, H = 12.23, P = 0.002) and correlation ( r s = 0.408, P < 0.001) between TMEM106B CTFs and the disease-associated TMEM106B haplotypes, with higher amounts of insoluble TMEM106B CTFs in individuals carrying the risk haplotype.

Importantly, we discovered a trend for a negative association between the level of histological MF and serum CITP:MMP1 ratios in the cohort as a whole ( r = −0.18; p = 0.08), which could predominantly be attributed to the highly significant association in the classical LF‐LG AS group ( r = −0.62; p = 0.002) (Figure 1C,D ).

Following to the results of our analysis, the level of oxygen delivery (one of the indicators of this approach) in neonates is highly significant; it essentially reduced the occurrence of sternal infection in the postoperative period (OR: 0.001; CI: 0.0003–0.067; p = 0.002).

Results HT patients group had highly significant greater cIMT as compared to NT patients (p=0.002) and this correlated with an increase in the expression of LRP1 mRNA expression (6.54 vs. 2.87) (p = 0.002) and LRP1 protein expression (17.83 vs. 6.25), respectively (p = 0.001).

For the species analysis along with the explanatory variables the unrestricted Monte Carlo permutation tests (499 permutations) of the significance of the canonical axes indicate axis 1 as statistically highly significant (p = 0.002).

Although this shift in mean frequency is not statistically significant due to the broad range of anti-NS3 responses, the changes for individual subjects are highly significant ( P = .002 for Healthy Control 1; P = .005 for Healthy Control 2).

After long storage difference in the yield of IS and GA was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

The overall trend, combining all paths, was highly significant ( p = 0.002), suggesting an overall increase in PSC rates during the first 60 days post-surgery, followed by stabilization. 3.4.

Nevertheless, despite the reduced number of subjects, we still observed a highly significant ventriloquist effect for invisible trials (experiment 1: 0.07 ± 0.02, t(27) = 3.22, p = 0.002; Cohen’s d: 0.61 ± 0.54; experiment 2: 0.08 ± 0.03, t(12) = 2.84, p = 0.007; Cohen’s d: 0.79 ± 0.8) (Fig. 2 ).