“highly significant”

Highly significant difference in muscle-epithelial distance was seen between controls as compared to early ( p -value =0.002), moderately advanced ( p -value = 0.001) and advanced OSF ( p -value = 0.001.

90 minutes of exposure to UV light resulted in a highly significant (p<0.002, n = 20) increase of gross O 2 production in the Ageladine A treatments vs. the controls (2.34 ± 0.38 and 0.92 ± 0.32% h -1 , respectively; Fig 1b ).

When expressed as peak-to-peak differences in OSI, the post-operative hyperosmolar cataract group showed an average fluctuation of 2.5±0.9 OSI units with a range of 1.8–5.0, and the normal osmolarity subjects averaged 1.4±0.4 OSI units with a range of 0.8–1.8, with the difference in variation being highly significant (p=0.002, two-tailed t -test).

The model was highly significant (p = 0.002) and explained 37% of the AIDS incidence variation among the municipalities (R = 0.61).

For brodifacoum and bromadiolone, these differences were highly significant (i.e. p ≤ 0.002; Table 1 ).

In cases of CME without SRF, there was a highly significant negative correlation between the duration and CC flow (in the 6 × 6 scans, r = −0.844, p = 0.002).

The Overall regression analysis yielded highly significant results for all three scales (p < 0.002 or better for all cases), with the highest adjusted R 2 for the PDD-BI, followed by the SAS and then the ATEC.

Five year postoperative survival is 33% and a highly significant trend (P=0.002) in favour of the older patients is reported.

The results confirm a highly significant association of fluid imbalance with lower than average midkine elevation in both cohorts ( p < 0.002), which was especially prevalent in diabetics.

Bat hunting was primarily a male activity and the association between gender and bat hunting was highly significant ( χ 2 test, p < 0.002).

cochlear implant hearing aid electroencephalography auditory evoked potentials source localization speech recognition bimodal benefit auditory rehabilitation Post-implantation, paired t tests ( t values) and Wilcoxon tests in case of non-normality ( z values) showed significant improvements of speech recognition with the CI ear between T3 and T4 for the OlSa S0 ( z = 3.296, ∗∗ p < 0.001), S0N0 ( t = 3.300, ∗∗ p < 0.001), and S0NHA ( z = 2.638, ∗ p < 0.009) conditions when applying the Bonferroni-corrected significance limen for significant ∗ ( p < 0.01) and highly significant ∗∗ ( p < 0.002) differences ( Figure 1 ).

That study further showed a highly significant loss of cartilage volume, quantified using MRI, in severe medial meniscal tear compared with absence of tear ( P = 0.002).

A highly significant negative rela- tionship between RAF1 protein levels and T50 in wtp53 cells (r = -0.97, P = 0.002) (Figure 6C) which was not present in the six cell lines bearing p53 mutations (r = 0.19, P = 0.72) (Figure 6F) was observed.

Furthermore, the plasma triglycerides-to-HDL ratio, a known marker for metabolic syndrome and highly atherogenic dyslipidemia,[ 18 ] showed a highly significant correlation with mFD (r = 0.480, p = 0.002).

All groups showed highly significant differences: high (Δ t > −2.2°C) vs. moderate cooling (Δ t 2.2–1.5°C) ( p = 0.002); moderate vs. low cooling (Δ t < −1.5°C) ( p = 0.0006) (Figure 6 ).

However, it was highly significant compared with that caused by LIRA alone (−0.19 ± 0.11 mg/kg/min) ( P = 0.002).

The difference to the unaffected newborns is highly significant ( p < 0.002).

For these 21 miRNAs, all data from stage I and stage II were merged and analyzed together resulting in highly significant DEG that survived Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (p < 0.002 [0.05/21]) and ROC between 0.9–1.0 were calculated for most genes suggesting a complete or almost complete separation of gene expression relative to the pre-exposure reference (bold p-values, Supplement Table 2 , right part).

Highly significant improvements were found in sprint 1 ( p = 0.002, 95% CI [0.032, 0.132], ηp 2 = 0.195), sprint 2 ( p = 0.001, 95% CI [0.018, 0.064], ηp 2 = 0.029), sprint 4 ( p = 0.000, 95% CI [0.097, 0.225], ηp 2 = 0.353), dribbling layup time ( p = 0.009, 95% CI [0.019, 0.124], ηp 2 = 0.152) and total completion time ( p = 0.000, 95% CI [0.446, 0.785], ηp 2 = 0.366). 3.3.2.

The statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences in skin color (p = 0.002) and a weak significant differences in gender (p = 0.052) distribution between the two groups.

Post hoc comparisons (see Supplementary Figure S2 ) displayed a highly significant increase in SDNN from pre- to post-training in the HRV-BF group ( p = 0.002), whereas no significant change in SDNN was found in the control group ( p > 0.999).

PERMANOVA demonstrated a highly significant variety effect ( p = 0.002), explaining 59% of the variance.

In the primary analysis, the ex vivo TNF-α values showed different temporal dynamics than the in vivo values as indicated by a highly significant group by time interaction analysis comparing the ex vivo and the in vivo values after the TNF-α peak, i.e. from 3 to 24 h (p = 0.002).

In addition, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the length of time since the Glenn procedure and HCT level ( P = .002), indicating that the longer the time since Glenn shunting, the higher the patient’s HCT level.

We previously reported that constitutive overexpression of asTF in PT45.P1 cells induces MAPK and Akt phosphorylation [ 7 ]; in this study, MAPK p42/44 phosphorylation levels were unaffected by RabMab1 treatment (data not shown), yet a highly significant decrease in pAKT-T308 was observed ( p = 0.002), while the levels of pAKT-S473 were unaffected (Figure 5C ).