“highly significant”

Under these conditions, both mouse lemurs achieved highly significant performance levels in aSIT freq ( Figure 1G , P = 2E-3 for mouse lemur 1 and P = 1E-12 for mouse lemur 2, binomial test, calculated for the last training session).

According to the analysis, a highly significant difference ( p = 0.002) was observed between the Mean and Median methods for both Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classifiers, regardless of the distance metric (Euclidean or Manhattan) used.

Furthermore, the plasma triglycerides-to-HDL ratio, a known marker for metabolic syndrome and highly atherogenic dyslipidemia,[ 18 ] showed a highly significant correlation with mFD (r = 0.480, p = 0.002).

The mean plaque index at 6 months, the comparison between Group A and Group C showed a highly significant mean difference of −0.70667 ( P = 0.002), underscoring the most substantial reduction in PI in Group A over time.

The decrease in the serum creatinine level at visit 2 was highly significant in mCRC patients (visit 2, 73±17 μmol/l; baseline, 78±18 μmol/l; P=0.002).

Another locus, TpMSAT13, exhibited a highly significant deviation from HWE ( χ 2 = 40.23, DF = 8, P = 0.002), which was still significant after Bonferroni correction (corrected α = 0.006).

Crucially, the interaction of congruency and task was highly significant, F (1, 46) = 10.80, p = 0.002.

The results for indication for ultrasound examination were highly significant ( P = 0.002) while the results for CUA did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.09).

Our analysis has also clearly shown that the difference between Chinese male and Chinese female patients is highly significant ( p < 0.002, Table 5 ).

Results: There was a highly significant association between higher Beclin1 and LC3B immunoreactivity score and Gleason score (score 8 and 9) ( P =0.002 and 0.000, respectively).

The secondary outcome of mortality was almost significant overall ( p = 0.07) and highly significant for people receiving supplemental oxygen at enrollment ( p = 0.002), suggesting a mortality benefit concentrated in this group.

Remarkably, a support-vector machine-based multiparameter classificator built on these data achieved highly significant prediction performance with a balanced accuracy of 82.7% (Sens. = 76.5%, Spec. = 88.9%, p = 0.002, Fig. 1 a and Table 2 ).

The main effects of the groups were highly significant (F (4, 42.647) = 5.250, p = 0.002).

[ 22 ] Residence area had a highly significant positive relationship with participants’ perceptions and experiences of telemedicine ( P = 0. 002).

The populations were separated into two major groups along the second axis of the PCA, which was highly significant (original dataset, p = 0.002 and corrected data set, p = 0.001).

There was highly significant genotypic differentiation (Fisher's exact test = P<0.002, df = 14) within populations for all loci except Dicten18 and Dicten27 (Fisher's exact test = P>0.1, df = 14).

Even though there were very few PAI-1 positive tumours in organ confined stages (T1/T2), this molecular marker turned out to be a highly significant predictor of developing metachronous metastasis in these patients with HR = 13,71 (p = 0.002).

An AGE-rich exposure response gradient was identified with the odds of developing WTC-OAD: not significantly increased in participants answering usual/often consumption of one AGE-rich food group, significantly increased in participants answering usual/often consumption to any two AGE-rich food groups, 1.50 (95% CI [1.14, 1.97]; p = 0.04), and highly significant in those answering usual/often consumption to all three AGE-rich food groups, 2.31 (95% CI [1.35, 3.95]; p = 0.002), Fig. 4 .

Normalized [ 18 F]FDG uptake in the MFG of both hemispheres decreased highly significant from baseline to follow-up PET in all patients (left MFG: mean reduction 10.7 ± 8.1%, FDR adjusted p = 0.002, right MFG: mean reduction 8.4 ± 4.1%, FDR adjusted p < 0.001) (see also Fig. 2 a; Table 2 ).

Post-treatment levels of variables: as expected, the treatment (MCAo/Sham) coefficient was highly significant ( p = 0.002), with a 95% confidence interval that estimates that sham animals had between 117.8 and 34.4 units lower than the ET1 animals, with all other variables held constant.

However, after 42 months, a highly significant difference was observed in the female group: a lower level in the active group (active: 56.02 ng/mL; placebo: 67.58 ng/mL; p = 0.002).

A highly significant (p=0.002) moderate positive correlation was recorded in patients aged <50 and moderate positive correlation of borderline significance in males (r s =0.324, p=0.058).

This variable explains 5.2% of total OTU variation and is highly significant (pseudo-F = 11.0, P = 0.002).

Despite the small number of patients, the difference between first and last BFRCS score was highly significant [ t (6) = 5.2, p = 0.002, n = 7, exclusion of the patient with Kanner scale], indicating that catatonia was more severe at the beginning [16.4 (SD 4.1)] than at the end of the course of tDCS [8.9 (SD 6.5)].

When the particle size was increased to 20-160 or 50-280/~ in diameter, the differences in N/C ra- tios between the BSA-WT5 and BSA-WTs conjugates were highly significant (P < 0.002).