Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
To determine whether the accumulation of platinum was related to hydrophobicity, log P was correlated with platinum concentration- time products in neurological tissues, blood and plasma (Figure 3). Highly significant inverse correlations were found between log P and platinum concentration-time products in DRG (r2 = 0.99; P = 0.004), sural nerve (r2 = 0.85; P = 0.025), sciatic nerve (r2 = 0.98; P = 0.0012), brain (r2 = 0.98, P = 0.0011) and spinal cord (r2 = 0.97; P = 0.0018).
highly significantP = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
2015 ), overexpression of the wild-type hDcr protein in NoDice/ΔPKR cells expressing the pCD-RLuc dsRNA insert did not induce repression of RLuc expression, when compared to the empty vector negative control, while a highly significant ( P = 0.004) level of inhibition of RLuc expression was detected in cells coexpressing the N1hDcr mutant, which shows a significantly enhanced ability to generate siRNAs from dsRNA substrates ( Kennedy et al. 2015 ).
highly significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
A comparison of GABAergic cell number between young monkeys and aged animals classified on the basis of DR and DNMS task performance revealed a highly significant group effect in the full basal forebrain as well as for the rostral and caudal divisions (one-way ANOVA; DR task main group effects, BF: F (2,19) = 7.581, p = 0.004; rostral division: F (2,19) = 4.726, p = 0.022; caudal division: F (2,19) = 3.848, p = 0.040; DNMS task main group effects, BF: F (2,19) = 8.121, p = 0.003; rostral division: F (2,19) = 5.062, p = 0.017; caudal division: F (2,19) = 4.017, p = 0.035; Fig. 8 B , C ).
highly significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Finally, in the comparison between Grades IV and I, the clinical pain component remained highly significant (OR = 9.000, 95% CI: 2.0399–39.704, p = 0.004), while the psychosocial component (OR = 3.962, 95% CI: 1.0753–14.601, p = 0.039) and pain modulation (OR = 0.265, 95% CI: 0.0736–0.955, p = 0.042) also showed significant relevance. 4.
highly significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The individuals living in Cochran and Bailey Counties had high likely to have cognitively impaired (AOR: 1.807, 95% CI: (0.749, 4.360), p = 0.188; AOR: 1.674, 95% CI: (0.267, 10.489), p = 0.582) though the adjusted odds ratios are not statistically significant, on the other hand Parmer County had the highest cognitively impaired individuals (AOR: 39.188, 95% CI: (3.123, 491.671) and this adjusted odds ratio is statistically highly significant ( p = 0.004).
highly significantp < 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
also found that there was a highly significant difference in olfactory loss in the RBD cohort who converted to PD (75%) compared to those who did not (48%, p < 0.004) (Fereshtehnejad et al., 2017 ).
The prodromes of Parkinson's disease.
Eur J Neurosci · 2019 · PMC6492156
highly significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
In Mossi ethnic group we noted that the CD3 + Panγδ + proportion remains stable through the season, whereas in Fulani ethnic group the proportion of these cells was double of that measured in Mossi ethnic group at the low transmission season and this difference was highly significant ( p = 0.004) (Figure 5 ) and remained significant during the high transmission season ( p = 0.04).
highly significantP = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
High severity of dyspnea was also associated with worse outcome, HR 3.43 (1.28–9.20) P = 0.014 ( Table 4 ) but when the BRS and DSS were entered into the same model, the BRS remained highly significant (HR 1.94 per SD increment (1.24–3.02) P = 0.004) whereas DSS did not remain a significant independent determinant of the endpoint (NS).
highly significantp = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
For cells from naïve animals tested with E GABA = -35 mV, 4-AP increased the proportion exhibiting PAD-induced spiking but not significantly ( p = 0.079; Fisher’s exact test) whereas the 4-AP effect was highly significant for E GABA = -20 mV ( p = 0.004).
highly significantp-value = 0.0040.1× alphaqualifiedgold
of borderline significancep-value = 0.0460.9× alpha
Presence of hyposalivation based on unstimulated salivary flow rate (IUS), although highly significant in the simple logistic regression model (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.24–3.27, p-value = 0.004) was only of borderline significance when adjusted for confounders (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.01–2.79, p-value = 0.046).