“highly significant”

This difference in % inhibition of thymidine uptakes between two groups was highly significant ( P <0.005) ( Figure 1b ).

Among these haplotypes, the single-plant yields observed were 29.81 ± 10.24 g, 37.71 ± 14.41 g, 36.64 ± 16.43 g, and 42.32 ± 11.73 g for the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th haplotypes, respectively, and the p value for the mean difference between the haplotypes was found to be highly significant ( p = 0.005) ( Figure 10 , Table 5 ). 2.10.

The CN x DN F, males had a mean of 26% -bearing spleen cells and thus resembled the CN mice whereas the CN x DN F, females had an intermediate value with a mean of 39.9%, a highly significant difference (P < 0.005) from that of the F, males.

The statistical analysis of cumulative drug release data, duration of drug release (hours) along with T50% with reference to increase in concentration of co-polymers (HK4M and PCL) was found to be highly significant (p < 0.005).

Strikingly, the difference in the ts/tv ratios were highly significant (p-value < 0.005) ( Fig. 1D ).

Highly significant positive correlations between ASL-ATT and CTP-MTT were obtained by voxel-level-wise associations in the gray matter, white matter, and whole brain (all P < 0.005), and the average Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.787, 0.707, and 0.799, respectively.

There was no significant difference between the means p=0.14 ( Figure 4A ) however paired analysis showed a highly significant reduction in albumin levels following fluticasone treatment at p<0.005 ( Figure 4B ).

Whereas there was no statistically significant difference in disease scores between iNOS KO and wild-type mice that did not receive IL-12 ( P = 0.74), scores of IL-12–treated iNOS KO and IL-12–treated wild-type mice differed at the highly significant probability value of P < 0.005.

In the univariate analysis, an sST2 value>35 ng/mL in STEMI patients showed highly significant predictive power for the risk of events, with an OR of 12.5 (95% CI 2.08-74.81, P =0.005).

The analyses of the BIS subscales showed that this differential effect was particularly attributable to motor impulsivity (i.e., acting without thinking), where the group*time interaction reached borderline significance ( p = .066, see also Table S4 in Supplement) and post hoc tests indicated a highly significant improvement in the active group ( p = .005) but no significant change in the sham group ( p = .58).

The treatment effect on LVM was greater when analysed using the per-protocol population with a highly significant reduction in LVM (change in LVM: metformin group −7.53 ± 4.66 g vs. placebo group −3.13 ± 6.36 g; P = 0.005).

Repeated experiments revealed that the increases in both GFP concentration (∼2.1 folds) and GFP bias (∼1.5 folds) due to histidine depletion were highly significant ( P <0.005, N =6) in OSU12-hisC ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).

When the mean decrease in growth rate due to parasite inoculum size for each dataset was plotted against mean initial growth rate, a highly significant relationship (r 2 = 0.7546, P < 0.005) was noted, even when the relationship between parasite population growth rate and inoculum size within individual datasets was non-significant (Fig. 3b ).

There was no statistically significant difference in disease duration since the introduction of the first csDMARD or bDMARD treatment, but the duration of disease at the introduction of the current bDMARD treatment was significantly shorter in the reduced-dose group than in the stable-dose group (9.7 vs 12.1 years, p = 0.034) (Table 1 ). In addition, we noted that there were proportionately more patients treated concurrently with MTX in the reduced-dose group than in the stable-dose group, and the difference was highly significant (86.7% vs 73.8%, p = 0.005).

These findings were statistically highly significant ( P = 0.005) when comparing teeth at 6- and 12-month intervals in Group III.

The difference in HMGB1 content between supernatants and EVs in CAL-62 is highly significant ( p < 0.005).

Pearson's correlation test was used, and a highly significant result was found between BMI and PPD ( P ≤ 0.005), whereas others were nonsignificant.

calcaneus or soft tissue were highly significant (p < 0.005).

The reduction in the mental stress is highly significant ( p -value < 0.005), as indicated by the mean PSS score decreasing from 32.72 (± 8.45) to 9.04 (± 3.38), which falls within the low-stress range of the PSS score (Fig. 4 d, Table S2 ).

We designed and transfected three ZNF667‐AS1 silencing sequences (Table S1 ) and found that the interference efficiency of si‐ZNF667‐AS1 with siRNA‐1 and siRNA‐3 sequences was significant ( P < 0.05), among which the interference efficiency of siRNA‐1 was highly significant ( P < 0.005), while that of siRNA‐2 was not significant ( P > 0.05; Fig. 2 C,F).

However, significant reductions in HbA1c%, HbA1c mmol/mol (0.36% and 3.96 mmol/mol, both P ≤ 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (3.84 mmHg, P = 0.004) were seen at the 6-month follow-up. Association of step count change with inflammatory and clinical markers of T2DM and CVD An increase in daily step count was associated with a highly significant decrease in IL6 ( P = 0.005) which represented a 0.81 ng/L reduction per 1000 steps, equating to a 13% decrease.

Among 6,215 RNAs monitored, 1,528 showed highly significant expression differences between the two parental strains ( p < 0.005 and < 2% expected false-positive rate by permutation testing).

Throughout the dates, varroa load was highly significant in colonies of the treated cornfields compared to those of the untreated ones (T = 2.81, P = 0.005) ( Table 2 ).

We identified 513 probe sets that represented 443 different genes with highly significant expression differences (p < 0.005) between the ischemic diabetic and ischemic non-diabetic muscle tissues.

KP also demonstrated a highly significant lateralisation in CSRT ( t = 2.6; p < .005; paired-samples t -test), with leftward CSRT 46 msec slower than rightward.