Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
This shows that PACT is a harmless treatment, that does not damage the adjacent normal tissues.[ 31 ] It was observed that there was highly significant difference ( P = 0.006) among control and experimental group for aerobic bacterial count with 10 2 dilutions.
highly significantP = 0.00600.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The association between sedentary behavior and elevated TyG-WC was highly significant in both the low activity group (β = 2.0217, 95 % CI [0.5801 to 3.4634], P = 0.0060) and high activity group (β = 3.8573, 95 % CI [2.3018 to 5.4128], P < 0.0001), but not significant in the middle activity group (β = 1.2830, 95 % CI [−0.1006 to 2.6666], P = 0.0692).
highly significantp = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
As expected, there were no significant main effects of SEQUENCE [ F (1, 17) = 0.41, p = 0.531] or HEMISPHERE [ F (1, 17) = 0.08, p = 0.783]; however, the N100m activity was much larger in the hemisphere contralateral to the ear of entry, as revealed by a highly significant main effect of EAR OF ENTRY [ F (2, 34) = 7.16, p = 0.006 ** ] and a highly significant HEMISPHERE * EAR OF ENTRY interaction [ F (2, 34) = 27.18, p < 0.001 *** ].
highly significantP =0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
16 Although early results of the SYNTAX trial demonstrated no difference in mortality, 17 the most recent 5‐year follow‐up reports a highly significant difference in all‐cause death (9.2% versus 14.6%; P =0.006) as well as cardiac death (4.0% versus 9.2%; P <0.001), favoring CABG versus PCI in for patients with triple‐vessel disease.
highly significantP = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
In a 2 × 3 ANOVA, we observed a highly significant interaction between the within-subject factor “cueing” and sleep disturbance group ( F (2,63) = 5.58, P = 0.006, η 2 = 0.15): Over the three nights of stimulation, undisturbed sleepers showed a significant memory improvement by TMR by ca. 12% points similar to previous findings in the sleep lab (cued words: 167.63 ± 1.15% vs. uncued: 155.41 ± 4.41%; t (14) = 3.25, P = 0.006, see Fig. 2 a).
highly significantP = 0.0060.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Node-negative cases without chemotherapy In locally limited tumors without nodal involvement and without known administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, both proteases were highly significant prognostic factors for overall survival (uPA: positive vs negative 91 months (CI: 78–103 months) vs 119 months (CI: 108–129 months); P = 0.006 ( BH ST 0.017) (Fig. 3 a); (PAI-1: positive vs negative 94 months (CI: 84–103 months) vs 125 months (CI: 114–136 months); P = 0.004 BH ST 0.025 (Fig. 3 b).