“highly significant”

Interestingly, a highly significant and strong correlation between TA and the amount of new bone was solely found in STE sites ( r = 0.794, P = 0.006), indicating that a reliable and predictable relation between the scaffold volume and the amount of newly formed bone existed in test sites only.

A highly significant difference was identified in the β -band MDI following the respiratory intervention ( Z = −2.771, p = 0.006, effect size r = 0.57).

The difference in methylation status of the SFRP1 promoter between the patients with colorectal neoplasia and the control group was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.006).

As expected, there were no significant main effects of SEQUENCE [ F (1, 17) = 0.41, p = 0.531] or HEMISPHERE [ F (1, 17) = 0.08, p = 0.783]; however, the N100m activity was much larger in the hemisphere contralateral to the ear of entry, as revealed by a highly significant main effect of EAR OF ENTRY [ F (2, 34) = 7.16, p = 0.006 ** ] and a highly significant HEMISPHERE * EAR OF ENTRY interaction [ F (2, 34) = 27.18, p < 0.001 *** ].

Likewise, there has been no significant association among various TLR9 genotypes and any of the coagulation indicators, except for a highly significant association with D-dimer (p = 0.006).

Node-negative cases without chemotherapy In locally limited tumors without nodal involvement and without known administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, both proteases were highly significant prognostic factors for overall survival (uPA: positive vs negative 91 months (CI: 78–103 months) vs 119 months (CI: 108–129 months); P = 0.006 ( BH ST 0.017) (Fig. 3 a); (PAI-1: positive vs negative 94 months (CI: 84–103 months) vs 125 months (CI: 114–136 months); P = 0.004 BH ST 0.025 (Fig. 3 b).

The differences were highly significant between the groups; B and S ( p = 0.006), T and S ( p = 0.005) and B and T ( p = 0.001).

When averaging across the entire anatomical regions defined by the right and left EC masks, there was no effect in left EC (p = 0.73) but a highly significant effect in right EC (p = 0.006).

The only method that did not show a significant between‐group difference was the VAS performed by the parents; this contrasted clearly with the VAS administrated by physicians, which showed a highly significant difference (p = 0.006).

The univariate analysis of covariance comparing the two groups at time point C3, while controlling for baseline levels was, however, highly significant ( F (1,16) = 10.05, P = 0.006, ω 2 = 0.32), with higher cortisol levels in the provoked group.

Moran's test detected highly significant but weakly positive spatial autocorrelation (Moran statistic I = 0.08, p = .006), meaning that neighboring sites tended to display similar temporal trends.

The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was highly significant between history of Calabar swelling and the degree of sylvan exposures ( P = 0.006) and age groups ( P = 0.001). 70.9% of people with occasional forest exposure and over 90% with daily exposure reported subsistence activities as reason for forest exposure ( Table 5 ).

A clustering analysis of the pairwise correlations of the positive or negative genetic interactions of the 65 ribosomal proteins ( Fig 2B ) identified three clusters, which had a highly significant overlap with the previous clustering based on phenotypic profiling (90% overlap between Clusters 1 and A and 89% between clusters 2 and B, Fisher Exact test, P = 0.006, S4 Table ).

The Spearman’s rank correlation test showed a highly significant correlation between the TPS of histological and cytological samples (rho = 0.836; p = 0.0060; Figure 4 B).

SCN10A (rs12632942) polymorphic variant had highly significant association with clinically relevant severity (Grade 0+1 vs Grade 2+3) of chronic OXAIPN ( Table 4 ) when compared to wild type allele A (P=0.006, OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.2 - 3.3).

Concurrently with the group comparison, domains were also compared: in the psychological domain, the walking group exhibited a highly significant improvement (F = 28.89, p < 0.006).

The statistical test to reject homogeneity of the OR was highly significant (p=0.006).

Comparison of binding parameters revealed a highly significant (p = 0.006) decrease in competitive potency for MLA+T30 (IC50 = 15.5±0.7 nM) as compared with MLA alone (IC50 = 9.5±0.4 nM; Fig. 3D ).

The regression analysis revealed that of eight potential determinants of vaccine confidence, “safety” and “effectiveness” had a highly significant ( P = 0.006, P = 0.001, respectively) and positive association and “efficacy” had a significant ( P = 0.03 ) and positive association, while “rumor” had a highly significant ( P = 0.000 ) and negative association with childhood vaccine confidence.

This association gets highly significant when we merged the patients of clopidogrel resistant and semi-responder group ( P = 0.006).

There was a highly significant association between psychological stress and duration of use of VDT, using the Chi-square test (p = 0.006).

Contrastingly, a highly significant difference in the frequency of occurrence of TT genotype versus the combined genotypes CC and CT in cases and controls was found [(p value= 0.006), OR (95% CI): 5.505 (1.460-20.756) ] i.e. the homozygous mutant genotype TT was more prevalent in cases compared to control group ( Table 2 ).

Subgroup analysis showed no significant age-related differences in males (P=0.389), but there was a highly significant difference in females (P=0.006), showing the higher prevalence of maxillary retrognathism in the 7-11-year-old female group.

When heart rate responses to pleasant and aversive stimuli were combined, the relationship with the difference in score was highly significant ( r = .651, P < .006).

The study also found a stark decrease in the absolute count of CD8 lymphocytes, with a highly significant P -value of less than 0.0001, as well as a decrease in the absolute count of CD19 lymphocytes ( P = 0.006).