“highly significant”

As depicted in Figure 2 , there were several sets of significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlations between the flavonoids and phenolic acids.

Differences were declared significant at P < 0.05 and highly significant at P < 0.01.

Highly significant regression coefficients (value of p ≤0.01) were observed between Factor 1 and Factor 2; Factor 1 and Factor 3; Factor 1 and Factor 4; Factor 4 and Factor 3; and Factor 4 and Factor 5.

The main effects of water supply (W) and genotype (G) on cane yield were highly significant ( p < 0.01).

The differences were considered as significant for P <0.05 and highly significant for P <0.01.

The highly significant correlation (0.65, P <0.01) strongly suggests that expression levels for this gene might be the cause of natural variation in indica GPC.

The Mantel test results demonstrated a significant or highly significant correlation between gd and ggd (R 2 = 0.1942, p < 0.01), gd and pre (R 2 = 0.2018, p < 0.01), gd and vapr (R 2 = 0.3297, p < 0.01), gd and sra (R 2 = 0.3849, p < 0.01), and gd and tmin (R 2 = 0.0536, 0.01 < p < 0.05).

Linear regression showed an R 2 of 0.6104, and a highly significant positive correlation (Pearson’s r ) ( r = 0.78, p < 0.01).

The barrel temperature had a highly significant effect on the polysaccharide content of Codonopsis pilosula extrudate ( p < 0.01), the moisture content of the material had a significant effect ( p < 0.05) and the screw speed had no significant effect ( p > 0.05).

A final stepwise model for Cox multivariate analysis identified the intensity of tumor budding at the invasive front of the tumor as the most highly significant and independent prognostic marker in patients with cT1,2N0M0 OSCC (HR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.49–3.20, p<0.01; S5 Table ).

ANOVA indicated highly significant effects ( p <0.01) of genotypes, environments, and genotype × environment interactions on PC and OC ( Table 1 ).

Accuracies ≥ 90% were regarded as highly significant (** p < 0.01), while differences above 95% between the group values were assigned the highest significance (*** p < 0.001).

Analysis of variance further indicated that the effects of environment on both CP and SP were highly significant ( P < 0.01).

The result showed a highly significant correlation between in house antibody and commercial antibody (r = 0.964, p<0.01).

58 Furthermore, a highly significant positive correlation has been found between TCT and DPPH with Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.79 ( P < 0.01), which revealed the same trend in the studies of Li et al. 59 and Wang et al. 60 The reason is that the phenolic compounds in tobacco are able to offer H to DPPH free radicals to form DPPH-H. 59 The TPC assay was detected having a significant positive correlation with antioxidant activity including ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP. 61 However, these correlations did not reach a significant level in this study.

Microstate temporal parameters For Duration A, the main effect of condition is significant [ F (1.699, 64.552) = 8.623, p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.185], with a highly significant difference between pre-exercise and aerobic exercise alone ( p < 0.01).

Alpha diversity patterns of bacterioplankton according to the three states in regime shift ASV richness index, Shannon index, Simpson index, Pielou index, Chao1 index, and ACE index all exhibited a highly significant negative correlations with temperature (Spearman correlations: R = −0.546, p < 0.01 for ASV richness index; R = −0.674, p < 0.01 for Shannon index; R = −0.696, p < 0.01 for Simpson index; R = −0.709, p < 0.01 for Pielou index; R = −0.552, p < 0.01 for Chao1 index; R = −0.550, p < 0.01 for ACE index) ( Table 1 ).

Compared with the ALV-J mono-infected group, the ALV-J+CIAV coinfected group showed a highly significant increase in thymus viral load at 3, 7, and 14 d ( p < 0.01).

Blood Glucose Level (BGL) of Normal and Diabetic Rats Treated With Jamun Sugar Drink and Jamun Stevia Drink The results showed a highly significant effect of treatments and days on blood glucose level ( p < 0.01).

When both pathways are removed, system performance drops to its lowest (F1 = 85.6 ± 1.4%, FID = 40.2 ± 1.8), with highly significant differences from the full model ( p < 0.01), confirming the essential contribution of bidirectional interaction.

The test for heterogeneity was highly significant, with p <0.01 for both abuse types and neglect.

The apoptotic rate in the D+IR group not only showed a highly significant difference from all the other groups ( P < 0.01), but also increased gradually with time.

The probability of error accepted for significant differences was p < 0.05 (* or #), and highly significant differences were identified for p < 0.01 (** or ##).

Additionally, a highly significant negative correlation is observed between plant height and the root-to-shoot ratio ( p < 0.01).

Difference between groups was considered highly significant (**) when p≤ 0.01 and significant (*) when p≤ 0.05.