“highly significant”

A comparison of those relations is presented in Table 3 . In single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) of polyp diameter in subgroups created with reference to PTEN protein expression, only highly significant differences ( p = 0.00005) were observed.

Only five genomic loci yielded highly significant scores ( p < 0.00005), and these loci emerged in all experimental conditions and replicates, showing no evidence of differential expression (see Supplemental Figure 6 ).

This model was highly significant (χ 2 [849] = 1775.03, p<0.00005), indicating the five factor model was a poor fit.

Across the significant surprise effects, this yielded a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.75, p < 0.00005; Fig. 2C ).

This revealed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.80, p<0.00005; Appendix 2—figure 1D ).

While in our DESeq analysis, this transcript fell just below the cutoff for fold change (1.24) the p -value was highly significant ( p -value = 5 × 10 −5 ), consistent with our qPCR results ( p -value = 0.0011, Holm-Sidak corrected).

The difference between the performance of two group in OSPE was highly significant ( P < 0.00005).

In particular, contrary to males, mutant females showed highly significant upregulation of Neuropeptide-like precursor 4 ( nplp4 ) and target of brain insulin ( tobi ) genes ( p = 5 × 10 −5 ).

-0.15 SD, respectively and the difference was highly significant (t(52) = 5.25, p = 0.00005).

In contrast, the noncancer group exhibited lower methylation rates, showing a highly significant statistical difference ( p < 0.00005, Figure 2 A, EXdata 2.

The results presented in Table 3 showed a highly significant ( p value = 0.00005, detection limit of the method being approximately 1 log CFU, CI-95%, 1.85, 2.77) log reduction (2.31) in microbial load after wiping the meat surface with the developed DW (count before treatment—5.48 log CFU/cm 2 ; after treatment—3.17 CFU/cm 2 ).

Treatment with clopidogrel was found to confer a risk reduction of 20% on the composite endpoint, at a highly significant P = 0.00005.

The majority (90.2%) of children with autism spectrum disorder without intellectual disability were born from 1994 to 1999 ( Table 1 ) and compared to the number born in 2000 to 2005, the difference is highly significant ( P < .00005).

Functional enrichment of the 606 putative hypoxia genes revealed highly significant functional groups ( p < .00005) related to oxygen sensing and hypoxia (GO:0036293, GO:0070482, GO:0001666, GO:1901700) and energy management (GO:0015979, GO:0019684, GO:0009765, GO:0009055, and GO:0004022).

BALB/c mice vaccinated with 20 μg of SLA plus 50 μg of CpG ODN showed a highly significant (P<5×10 −5 ) reduction in swelling compared to SLA-vaccinated mice and enhanced survival compared to unvaccinated mice.

The differences are highly significant for every one of the possible comparisons involving two out of the three groups ( P < 0.00005 in every case).

The trained birds' preference for the Dreadnought Grey disc was statistically highly significant (P<0.00005, using the binomial statistics described in “ Methods ”).

While there was no significant effect of blindsight status (positive or negative; F = 2.6, p = 0.13), there was a highly significant effect of lesion side (ipsilateral or contralateral; F = 35.7; p < 0.00005) and interaction, suggesting a differential effect of the lesion in the two patient groups (F = 5.1; p = 0.04).

A highly significant ( p value < 0.00005) likelihood ratio test compared to a standard logistic model supported that the mixed-effects model was better fit for our data.

There was such increases of 4.4 dB for each of the groups Education , Other and Music , and they were highly significant (p<0.00005, Tukey's HSD).

In contrast, when used in the study of 120 colorectal cancers, these four markers detected a LOH in 38 out of 85 informative cases (45%), a difference that is highly significant (X = 16.38; P<0.00005).

Volumetry could demonstrate a highly significant ( p = 0.00005) volume increase, while the intervention led to a significant ( p = 0.0076) volume decrease during the day.

Using a highly significant P value cutoff ( P < 0.00005), we identified 12 proteins that exhibit differential expression between these OA subsets (Figure 3 ).

SChLAP1 expression was highly significant when distinguishing CP and PCSM (p = 0.00005 and p = 0.002, respectively) ( Fig. 2d,e ).

When exposing 104C1 cells that acquire a fibroblast morphology to increasing concentrations of KDC203, we observed highly significant ( p <0.00005) dose-dependent reductions in PrP C levels ( Fig 2A ).