“highly significant”

3.1.2 Reproductive traits Analysis of variance revealed that the reproductive traits anthesis days, silking days and anthesis silking interval showed highly significant differences (P ≤ 0.0001) in both the seasons, between the genotypes ( Table 3 ).

However, when comparing G-II with G-III, a highly significant decrease in AST, ALT, ALP, and prothrombin ( p value <0.0001) was observed in G-III (data not shown in this work). 4.

All the detergents have shown highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) from native in PD, although no significant variation among each other ( p > 0.998).

The difference in aPTT values was highly significant (p < 0.0001), as was the difference in TT values (p < 0.0001), indicating stronger divergence in blood bank plasma samples.

Differences were considered as ‘not significant’ in cases with p-values > 0.1, as ‘borderline significant’ ( # ) with p-values between 0.05 and 0.1, as ‘significant’ (*) with p values between 0.01 and 0.05, as ‘highly significant’ (**) with p values between 0.001 and 0.01, as ‘very highly significant’ (***) with p values between 0.0001 and 0.001 and as ‘extremely significant’ (****) with p-values < 0.0001.

Analysis results reported in Table 3 , as well as, the parameters which statistically indicated highly significant impact on the yield were linear term of pressure, CO 2 flow rate and time (p < 0.0001), followed using the quadratic term of flow rate(p < 0.0001).

Furthermore, an Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis ( Figure S4E ) confirmed a highly significant overall hearing deficit in the Foxi1 N155del/+ mice (95% CI = [1254, 1675]; P < 0.0001; t-test).

As shown in Figure 3B , the addition of CypA or CypB resulted in a highly significant improvement ( p < 0.0001) in the refolding of the acid-denatured GFP confirming their true enzymatic activity.

Furthermore, we evaluated the development of depression-like behavior as evidenced by immobility time in the tail suspension test and observed increased immobility time upon LPS treatment (Welch’s ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant effect of LPS (F(3,23.1)=17.19, p < 0.0001).

We observed a highly significant difference (p value = 0.0001) between patients’ antibody response to P3/FUR/x3 based on their disease status.

Results The median value of HBD-3 gene expression on skin lesion in leprosy patients was 260.61 (0.19–3734.10); normal skin in leprosy patients was 1.91 (0.01–151.17); household contacts skin was 7.93 (0.27–121.10); and healthy individuals’ skin was 1.00 (1.00–1.00) is highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).

The DSMB recommended to stop the trial enrolment on the basis of: (i) clear benefit in the primary endpoint in the ‘stratified treatment’ arm (observed difference in SAQSS between groups was highly significant [ t = 7.25, P < .0001], with the corresponding Z -score [6.42] exceeding the O’Brien–Fleming boundary [Z = 2.74], confirming the robustness of the result and a low risk of false-positive conclusion due to interim testing); (ii) a numerically higher rate of MACE in the ‘standard of care’ arm; (iii)

The trend towards lower proportions of BT and higher frequencies of malignant tumours (GCT + OM) in increasing tumour size categories was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Cochran–Armitage trend test).

Availability of oxygen and the impact of induced adaptive evolution as well as the interaction effect between these two factors were identified as highly significant (p-values < 0.0001) by ANOVA.

Pearson correlation analysis between qRT-PCR (ΔΔCt method) and RNA-seq (log2FC) data revealed a highly significant positive correlation (Pearson’s r = 0.965, R2 = 0.984, 95% CI: 0.942–0.991, p < 0.0001), demonstrating strong consistency between the two platforms.

Correlations between PCA derived indices and traditional indices was highly significant: r = 0.954 P < 0.0001 and r = 0.963 P < 0.0001 , for production and quality indices of all 861 selection candidates ( Figs. 4b and 5 ).

The main effect of ROI combinations (BOLD activations within MTL, VS, and MTL + VS sets) was highly significant (F = 46.8, P < 0.0001): for the outside-session recognition condition ( Fig. 3 B ), the 25 visual ROIs and the 5 MTL ROIs in combination showed the best mean balanced accuracy at 59.6%.

This prediction was highly significant for correct trials (ANOVA, F = 43.84, df 3/14, P < 0.0001).

Co-infection analysis showed a highly significant association with HIV (p<0.0001, OR=26.32, 95% CI: 20.22-34.28).

The results revealed down-regulation of biofilm genes in comparison to those of the control; this was highly significant (***) for plcR and sipW genes ( p < 0.0001), while was significant (*) with tasA gene ( p < 0.05) ( Table 8 ).

The effects of the target plant and the interaction between the experimental regime and the target plant were highly significant (Wald χ 2 = 1066.5, df = 2, p < 0.0001, Wald χ 2 = 167.0, df = 6, p < 0.0001, respectively).

amylovora population values were smaller in R1 (of around 0.6 orders of magnitude) than in R2 (around 1.6 orders of magnitude) but highly significant in both experiment repeats ( p < 0.0001).

Treatment was highly significant for TMAO concentrations ( P < 0.0001) and yields ( P < 0.0001), where colostrum from both CHOL45 and CHOL30 cows had greater concentrations (both comparisons, P < 0.0001) and yields (both comparisons, P < 0.01) than CON.

At the end of the treatment (Day 37), one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in rotarod performance among the groups ( P < 0.0001).

For SMA types 1 and 2, the age at the treatment initialization is highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and correlated with treatment yield.