“highly significant”

Highly significant increases of plasma NfL were observed in all cognitively impaired and atypical parkinsonian groups as compared to PD ( P < 0.0001).

Due to the high number of terms compared for each category (see Materials and Methods), this difference is highly significant (P<0.0001).

These results were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) compared to MT.

However, a highly significant and positive relationship was recorded between COVID-19 knowledge ( r =0.90, p <0.0001) and awareness ( r =0.65, p <0.0001), and preventive practice of FCSW, respectively.

Two-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare the mean of three values obtained from three independent conditions, using GraphPad Prism version 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, U.S.); * p < 0.05 indicates a significant result; ** p < 0.01 a very significant result, *** p < 0.001 a highly significant result; and **** p < 0.0001 an extremely significant result. 3.

We also found highly significant differences in CD8, CD4 and CD3 staining in tumors between TIL growers and non-growers (p<0.0001).

This enrichment is highly significant ( P -value <0.0001, Fisher’s exact test), with an odds ratio of around 45.2 for the TM mixture; i.e.

Concordantly, enhanced expressions of CD24 and CD200 were observed in all three NB lines following cultivation in stem cell media, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001) for CD200 compared to both serum-supplemented incubations.

Two-sample t test showed highly significant group differences ( p < 0.0001) for all measures in both striatal regions ( Table 2 ).

Differential RNA‐fragment abundances in glioblastoma aggregates, in which only the APOE allele differs between cell lines, tend to be highly significant (53 of 59 have p < 0.0001) and comprise an interesting set.

We found a moderate but highly significant negative correlation between high SMAD1 expression and KEGG Apoptosis pathway inhibition across the ~ 1000 CCLE cell lines ( R = -0.1486, p < 0.0001) (Fig.

There was a highly significant difference among the groups (p < 0.0001).

All R 2 values were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The differences in latency to lay between large and small focal worms paired with matched or unmatched partners were highly significant (GLM; focal worm category [small]: (β = 1.025 ± 0.210, χ 2 = 25.386, df = 1, P < 0.0001; partner’s size: [unmatched]: (β = 0.434 ± 0.192, χ 2 = 5.625, df = 1, P = 0.018).

At both time points, highly significant increases in STAT6 phosphorylation (pSTAT6) (Fig. 3 b,c), as well as pSTAT3, was detected in both T cell subsets (p < 0.0001 for all) (Fig. 3 d–f).

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with no lack of fit ( p > 0.05), while the optimum conditions (Arabic gum at 160°C) were validated with < 2% deviation.

Influence of light treatment on plant height was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

This expectation agrees with the experimental data (see Fig 3D ), as the average rate of the autonomous firing of prototypic neurons (18.0 spikes/s) was higher than that of arkypallidal neurons (5.1 spikes/s), and this difference was highly significant (p = 0.0001, unpaired t-test).

Association of DOX-induced cardiotoxicity with CBR3 V244M genotype status We compared left ventricular systolic function from pre- and post-DOX treatment echocardiograms in each CBR3 V244M genotype group and found a highly significant effect of DOX treatment on left ventricular systolic function (F[1,89] = 50.33, p < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA).

Irrespective of probiotic treatment, the ME content of the diets had a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) effect on the liver weight of broilers when expressed as a percentage of BW.

Comparing the control group with group-k (which was provided with a mixture of three HMs), group-k had highly significant absorption of HMs (ANOVA, p < 0.0001, F ratio 18296, df bc = 5, df wc = 30, total df = 35) of HMs.

In the temperature + month model, temperature was a highly significant predictor of weevil captures ( F 1,325 = 27.79, P < 0.0001), while month had no significant effect on weevil captures ( F 11,325 = 1.52, P = 0.1514), showing that temperature alone explained the seasonal pattern.

Intra- and interobserver agreements for the counts of IENFs were highly significant, as verified by correlations (intraobserver reliability for paw pad skin tested on two counts each for ten randomly chosen slides: R = 0.9879, p < 0.0001; interobserver reliability for paw pad skin tested on one count by two observers for ten randomly chosen slides: R = 0.8303, p = 0.0047).

The interaction effect of age and SDC during childhood was highly significant (P < 0.0001).

When the CCP level was high positive (>40), the odds of RA were found to be 4.94 times as high as compared to a low positive CCP, and this was highly significant ( P < .0001).