IG# showed a highly significant difference between non-infected and infected patients early in period 1 and period 5, ( P < 0.0001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Effect of Amplitude and Time on Total Phenolic Content and Anthocyanins The linear amplitude term (β 1 ) for the extraction of TPC was significant at p < 0.01, while the quadratic terms for amplitude and time (β 11 , β 22 , respectively) were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
ANOVA revealed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and the effects of the glucose and butyric acid concentrations on butanol production were significant.
ln ( R S S n ) + 2 k R S S = ∑ i = 1 n ( y i − y i ^ ) 2 = r e s i d u a l s u m o f s q u a r e s n = n u m b e r o f o b s e r v a t i o n s k = n u m b e r o f e s t i m a t e d p a r a m e t e r s i n t h e m o d e l ( i n c l u d i n g t h e i n t e r c e p t ) Result and discussion Dietary Lys levels produced a highly significant effect on plasma UA ( F (4, 31) = 103.45, P < 0.0001).
ANOVA results showed that among the models of linear, two-factor interaction (2FI), and quadratic, the quadratic model was highly significant and best fit the experimental data (F = 42.36; p < 0.0001) (Table S4).
Geographic variation in Cry3 susceptibility Keith County grid The effect of geographic location of larger scale population clusters was highly significant for both Cry3Bb1 (F = 74.42; df = 1, 226; P <0.0001) and mCry3A (F = 84.14; df = 1, 226; P <0.0001) traits within the Keith County grid.
Both cRBF and eGFR demonstrated a highly significant increase at 3 months compared to baseline (mean cRBF 251.71 ± 78.27 vs. 486.61 ± 156.08 ml/kidney/min, p = 0.0001; mean eGFR 46.62 ± 16.36 vs. 69.81 ± 24.83 ml/min/1.73 m 2 ; p = 0.02) and remained consistent until the end of the observed period.
The unadjusted HR was 2.248 with a 95% CI of 2.105 to 2.401, which was highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).
The result presented in Table 3 shows a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) decrease in the levels of total protein, reduced glutathione (GSH) and vitamin C contents in the reproductive tissues of ethanol-ingested rats relative to controls.
The linear regression fitted to log length and number of oysters per sack was highly significant (adjusted r 2 = 0.93, F 58 = 809, p < 0.0001), and yielded the following predictive relationship between the number of oysters in a known volume and the mean oyster length: h = 10 (−0.3537 log b + 2.8361) , where h is SH (from umbo to growth edge) in millimetres, and b is the number of oysters in a 52.85 l volume (standard Louisiana sack).
The permutation test confirmed a highly significant difference in the truncated SH sequences associated with both survival groups ( p < 0.0001).
ty} \oddsidemargin -1.0in \begin{document} \chi_{\left(1 \right)}^2 = \,\,\frac{{{{\left({532\,\, \times \,\,53\,\, - 13\,\, \times \,\,73} \right)}^2}\, \times \,\,671}}{{545\,\, \times \,\,126\,\, \times \,\,605\,\, \times \,\,66}} = 181.7 \end{document} The large chi-squared value evidenced a highly significant association between postoperative nausea and vomiting in surgical patients ( p < 0.0001), and the hypothesis of independence between the two symptoms was rejected.
When we look at the accumulation of [ 57 Co]-B12 in the individual fetuses ( Figure 4 H), this trend becomes highly significant (5-week 1C imbalanced, p = 0.0001; 7-week 1C imbalanced fetuses, p = 0.0001) ( Figure 4 ).
The difference in sequence lengths generated from the two otherwise identical homopoly(U) RNA templates was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The difference observed was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.0001).
2 F ), and this overlap is highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by Fisher’s exact test), proving the similarity of CCGs identified in both NAFLD-HCC screens.
The other seven genes, WD repeat-containing protein 61 , Dt1 , MADS-box protein , two genes of two-component response regulator -like genes, FT2a , and PhyB , showed highly significant association with flowering time ( P < 0.0001) ( Table 3 and Supplementary Table S8 ).
Two biological replicates were analyzed for all conditions (i.e., n = 2 per condition), and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) Pearson correlation coefficient values were obtained for each replicate set ( r = 0.9 and 0.855 for p65 ChIP replicates; r = 0.849 and 0.85 for BMAL1 ChIP replicates, and r = 0.890 and 0.888 for CLOCK ChIP replicates in saline and LPS conditions, respectively) ( Supplemental Fig.
This association also remains highly significant in separate analyses of recurrent and nonrecurrent chromosome abnormalities as well as of specific subtypes of cancer ( P < 0.0001 for all comparisons).
The difference between the two groups was highly significant with regard to PD and CAL ( P =0.0001 and P =0.001, respectively; Table 2 ).
As expected, there were highly significant differences among the three regional comparisons (Friedman ANOVA: χ 2 2df = 77.82; p <0.0001).
The students with JIA who were able to attend school were absent much more often than controls (63% compared to 20%), with a highly significant p value (p<0.0001).
Correlation analysis between SPR and ACM illuminance measurements (in lux) for visible light ( Table 1 ) resulted to be strong ( r = 0.946) and highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a slope of 0.558.
This difference between CD8 and CD4 was highly significant comparing all time points (10 d to 7 m) (p = 0.0001, Anova).
This posed a highly significant difference between the two B12 forms ( p < 0.0001).