“highly significant”

The data indicate that the regression model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the error term is not significant ( p > 0.05).

By day 5, inhibition of Alternaria alternate and Aspergillus niger was highly significant (**** p < 0.0001), and that of Penicillium sp. was also strongly significant (*** p < 0.001), underscoring the sustained efficacy of the microencapsulated formulation.

Friedman’s test proved that the effect of the stimulus on perceived fear was highly significant (chi-square = 6130.252, df = 41, P < 0.0001).

Analysis by R, fitting a GLM with a quasibinomial error structure, confirmed the highly significant main effects of age (change in deviance = 84.45, P < 0.0001, for 6 df) and region (change in deviance = 27.03, P < 0.0001, for 3 df), and the 2-way interaction between age and region (change in deviance = 34.85, P = 0.01, for 18 df, residual degrees of freedom = 1615).

A highly significant correlation between lactose and fructose malabsorption could also be noted (6.8% LI vs. 0.2% non-LI; P<0.0001; OR 31.06) ( Table 2 ).

While each inhibitor separately was unable to significantly decrease the rate of tumour growth, their combination induced a highly significant 27% decrease in growth rate ( p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney test) (Figure 7A ).

The association of duration of use remained highly significant for moderate or greater AR ( p < 0.0001) but the association with moderate or greater MR did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.09, one-sided) while the trend for moderate or greater TR remained statistically significant ( p = 0.007, one-sided).

A highly significant association was observed for rs1248923790 ( p < 0.0001, χ2 = 26.39). the TT genotype was significantly more common in disease cases (201) compared to controls (136), with an increased risk of disease (OR = 2.106, RR = 1.446, 95% CI: 1.249–1.679).

We observed a highly significant correlation between the genetic distance and the variance (Pearson correlation coefficient: r = 0.773, n = 16, two-tailed p <0.0001), indicating that segregation increased in proportion to the genetic distance between strains.

We repeated this 2500 times to build a null distribution of Δβ, and calculated the proportion with equal or stronger reductions for a one-tailed p-value, which was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Furthermore, the increase of percentage of centralized nuclei remained highly significant at the ages of 3 months (F (1, 24) = 60.27, p < 0.0001), 5 months (F (1, 28) = 66.91, p < 0.0001) and 10 months (F (1, 24) = 74.14, p < 0.0001), until the age of 15 months (F (1, 24) = 63.22, p < 0.0001).

A two-tailed unpaired t -test confirmed this difference was highly significant ( t = 73.07, P < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant difference among the unirradiated groups compared to control Candida alone, with HSCO cells enhancing and HECV cells inhibiting the proliferation of Candida (p<0.0001 in both cases).

There was a highly significant effect of group on the accuracy difference (M - W), as indicated by ANOVA (F (2, 138) = 48.96, p < 0.0001).

Unpaired t-tests comparing the seronegative and seropositive populations yielded highly significant p-values (p<0.0001) for both the Immunetics® C6 Lyme ELISATM ( Fig 2A ) and the MicroB-plex Anti-C6/Anti-pepC10 Immunoassay ( Fig 2B ).

Mortality analysis ( Figure 2 ) Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly lower all-cause mortality in the HIF group compared to the ESA group, with a highly significant log-rank test ( p < 0.0001), indicating improved survival among HIF users.

The two-way ANOVA test proved that differences in the frequency of apoptotic cells treated with H 2 O 2 between the tested emulsions were insignificant ( p = 0.113), while the impact of various concentrations of emulsions was highly significant ( p < 10 −4 ).

Each Spearman correlation was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), except for the relationships of sleep with pain ( p = 0.0008), with general activity ( p = 0.0004), with walking ability ( p = 0.0068), and with relations with others ( p = 0.0029).

One-year survival for good, moderate, and poor risk groups were 48.5, 25.7, and 11%, respectively, with a highly significant difference among the three groups ( P <0.0001).

Both differences were highly significant (p < .0001) [61].

The CXCL12-induced increases in cell number observed after 7 days were therefore always highly significant ( P <0.0001).

The difference between substitution rates at non-CpG and non-CpG prone sites is highly significant both in introns and at fourfold sites (P < 0.0001; bootstrap test).

The differences in the distribution of major categories with respect to isolated/syndromic occurrence were statistically highly significant (p<0.0001).

A Pearson's chi-square test comparing arsenic associated diseases (derived from 424 arsenic-interacting genes) indicated that these associations were highly significant (p-value < 0.0001).

The results show that there is indeed a highly significant negative correlation (correlation coefficient R 2 = 0.87; P = 1 × 10 −04 ) between the degree of nucleotide bias and the d N/ d S ratio (see fig. 2 a ).