The pattern of trait correlations among pigeons is highly significant when adjusted for repeatability ( r m >1 between rock dove and domestic (p<0.0001); r m =0.798 for the feral-domestic comparison (p<0.0001)) ( Supplementary Tab. 3 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Results Relationship between Maternal LOC and IQ at 8 The unadjusted difference between the mean IQ of 8-year-old children whose mothers were external compared to those who were internally oriented showed deficits of 7.33, 5.29, and 7.23 IQ points for the verbal, performance and full IQ scales, respectively ( Table 2 ); each was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
( 1995 ), where the correlation between sCA and dCA was highly significant ( r = 0.93, P < 0.0001).
In parallel, in all cases there was also a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) increase in viscosity.
The Kaplan–Meier curve, however, does show a highly significant trend of loss-of-barrier function at higher concentration ( P < 0.0001 for both curve difference and trend significance, derived from log-rank tests) (Fig. 4i ).
There was a highly significant difference in both mean ADC and mean rADC values between benign and malignant lesions (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0002, respectively; Student’s t-test).
There was a highly significant correlation ( r = 0.91, p < 0.0001) between these early changes in deoxygenated hemoglobin and late vascular injury severity assessed at the end of 4 weeks.
Multiple Regression Model of Severity Scores Pre-HEVM Treatment There was a highly significant relationship between longstanding symptom severity and the set of predictors used in the C3 Logix diagnostic platform [ F (40,29) = 160.17, p < 0.0001] before HEVM therapy.
One-way ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant effect of incubation time on biofilm formation ( p < 0.0001, R 2 = 0.966).
The paired t-test values between NZ and SC are highly significant for Olsen P t (1, 19) 5.45, p < 0.0001; Total N t (1, 19) 4.73, p < 0.0001, and pH t (1, 19) -18.4, p < 0.0001 respectively.
Preliminary population genomics analysis The non-hierarchical AMOVA carried out on all four community samples for both datasets (BcgI and CspCI) detected a strong signal of genetic structuring across the study area, with highly significant (P< 0.0001) global F ST values of 0.20452 (BcgI) and 0.39327 (CspCI).
The relative risk of each stage by sex (women/men) was: Stage 1 , 0.72 (more in men); Stage 2 , 1.11; Stage 3 , 1.68; and Stage 4 , 9.29 (all three more in women); these sex-differences were highly significant (overall χ 2 [d f = 3] = 51.3, p < 0.0001).
Kindling also had strong heritability and differences were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) between strains ( Table 1 ).
A one-way ANOVA with the between-subject factor groups (CG, LG, IG, MG) revealed a highly significant effect, F (3, 115) = 30.68, p < .0001, η p 2 = .45.
Additionally, acarbose significantly reversed IGT to NGT; an effect that was highly significant when compared to the placebo group (p<0.0001).
The effect of adapting speed using row-scrambled videos was highly significant (F (2, 8) = 22.79, p = 0.0001, n = 5).
The OD600 absorbance values for the AYEF+Uracil and ΔlpxM-AYEF+Uracil strains underwent T -test analysis, revealing a highly significant difference (**** P <0.0001, suggesting a statistically significant distinction between the two groups.
Population expansions appear to have been more prominent in the southern part of the distribution, with highly significant negative F s values for the Gulf Coast ( F s = −24.98, p < 0.0001), and West Florida ( F s = −13.5, p < 0.0001), and with localities such as Cedar Key (CKFL) and Apalachicola (APFL) representing clear examples.
When pooled together, the two groups of lines “low RAS/RT ratio” (L8, L82, and L44) and “high RAS/RT ratio” (L92, L12, L118, L14, L57, and L39) were clearly separated in terms of average RAS/RT ratio, the difference being highly significant (respectively 9.15 < 19.35 g/g; Student t -test p < 0.0001).
Highly significant values ( p < 0.0001) are shown in red.
The association between the sustained hypermotile phenotype and sub-micromolar inhibition of huPDE4 was highly significant with a Fishers exact p -value of <0.0001.
The increase in the rates of thyroid admission was highly significant ( p < 0.0001). 3.2.
5A ) and were highly significant (all p<0.0001, FDR-corrected).
Highly significant IOV was demonstrated for CT based contouring of the tumour bed (p < 0.0001), while agreement was high for the MRI-based approach.
PCM1 knockdown resulted in highly significant (p ≤ 0.0001) reduction of GABARAP at the PCM ( Figures 4 A, 4B, and S3 A) and a small increase in γ-tubulin.