Nevertheless, the improvements remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for patients who received the Dermgraft and Dermgraft with SW treatments (Fig. 5 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Correlations in the premanifest group showed a highly significant relationship between NfL levels and CAP score ( r = 0.751; p < 0.0001) and with age ( r = 0.594; p = 0.004).
Compared to early presentation (≤ 13 weeks), late presentation (> 27 weeks) to mental health clinics was a highly significant risk ( p = 0.0001) for suicidality in women.
leopoldii showed highly significant differences compared to G. piotii ( P < 0.0001) and G. pickettii 3 ( P < 0.0001), with mean differences in amylose degradation rates of 0.776 and 0.787, respectively.
The impact of HIF-1α on OS still retains highly significant (P<0.0001).
These results demonstrate a highly significant correlation (χ 2 (3) = 29.1, p ≤ 0.0001) between the presence/absence of toxicity rescue by olaparib and the presence/absence of the DNA ring morphologies in these samples ( Figure 4 D).
Comparison between before 24 weeks gestations and at 37 weeks gestations showed a highly significant decrease (p<0.0001) in fasting blood glucose level.
A highly significant decrease in EPS dry weight was observed in E. faecium , E.faecalis , E. aerogens (**** p < 0.0001), S.epidermidis , and A. baumannii (*** p < 0.001) as compared to control.
Dopamine transporter mRNA and protein levels There was a highly significant 45% decrease in DAT mRNA levels (F=17.73; df=55; P <0.0001) and also a significant 37% decrease in the levels of VMAT2 mRNA (F=6.54; df=54; P =0.014) in the substantia nigra of schizophrenia cases when compared with controls ( Figures 3a and b ).
Individuals aged 5 years and older who reported fever in the last 2 weeks had an elevated risk of having malaria infection in both sites, and the association was stronger for the lower transmission: OR = 38.71 (95 % CI 11.08–135.23), and OR = 2.05 (95 % CI 1.07–3.95) in Selembao, with a highly significant interaction term (p < 0.0001).
Conversely, metabolites such as inosine, dalbergin, and certain unknown metabolites exhibited strong positive correlations with these parameters, which were also highly significant (p < 0.0001).
In particular: “Working duties” and “Change in the institute of reference” are highly significant (p < 0.0001). “Difficulties in the use of technology”, “Family duties”, “Worsening of health conditions”, and “No response” show significant differences with p < 0.05. “Laziness” does not show a significant difference (p > 0.05). 4.
Expectedly both S100 proteins correlated highly significant ( r = 0.82; p < 0.0001) and reproduced elevated levels in M649V homozygous FMF patients during inactive disease, and a gene-dose effect with significantly lower levels in heterozygous M694V FMF patients (Fig. 1 C and D).
score was very strong and highly significant (ρ = 0.874, p < 0.0001).
However, comparing adherence trends in the subsamples with comorbid ADHD (n = 117) and without ADHD (n = 62) showed that the association between younger age and poor adherence was highly significant in the subsample with ADHD (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.73, p < .0001) and nonsignificant in the subsample without ADHD (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.47, p = .6).
Preliminary population genomics analysis The non-hierarchical AMOVA carried out on all four community samples for both datasets (BcgI and CspCI) detected a strong signal of genetic structuring across the study area, with highly significant (P< 0.0001) global F ST values of 0.20452 (BcgI) and 0.39327 (CspCI).
A one-way ANOVA with the between-subject factor groups (CG, LG, IG, MG) revealed a highly significant effect, F (3, 115) = 30.68, p < .0001, η p 2 = .45.
Highly significant correlations were observed between overall CLDQ score with SF-36 PCS (r=0.82, p<0.0001) and SF-36 MCS (r=0.67, p<0.0001) scores.
On comparison, a highly significant difference was found between age and DMFT score with a p-value ≤0.0001).
In contrast, cells expressing E2814-CAR exhibited highly significant differences ( F (7, 16) = 127.2703, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.9824; Table 3b).
described that the ACQ score significantly decreased from 3.58 ± 1.28 to 2.01 ± 1.05 after 16 weeks (−43.7%), treatment responders showed greater and highly significant improvements of symptoms compared with non-responders even after 16 weeks (−46.9%, p < 0.0001 vs −36.1%, p < 0.05) [ 16 ].
contortus was found to occur in 60% of the flocks, showing a highly significant variation in regional occurrence (P < 0.0001).
The association between the sustained hypermotile phenotype and sub-micromolar inhibition of huPDE4 was highly significant with a Fishers exact p -value of <0.0001.
Because the overall test was highly significant ( G = 376.14, DF = 52, P < 0.0001), indicating differences among the 5 sections of the study area, we performed 2 × 14 log-likelihood chi-square tests for each of the 5 sections to identify which had food items that varied.
Population expansions appear to have been more prominent in the southern part of the distribution, with highly significant negative F s values for the Gulf Coast ( F s = −24.98, p < 0.0001), and West Florida ( F s = −13.5, p < 0.0001), and with localities such as Cedar Key (CKFL) and Apalachicola (APFL) representing clear examples.