Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP <0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Dopamine transporter mRNA and protein levels There was a highly significant 45% decrease in DAT mRNA levels (F=17.73; df=55; P <0.0001) and also a significant 37% decrease in the levels of VMAT2 mRNA (F=6.54; df=54; P =0.014) in the substantia nigra of schizophrenia cases when compared with controls ( Figures 3a and b ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Individuals aged 5 years and older who reported fever in the last 2 weeks had an elevated risk of having malaria infection in both sites, and the association was stronger for the lower transmission: OR = 38.71 (95 % CI 11.08–135.23), and OR = 2.05 (95 % CI 1.07–3.95) in Selembao, with a highly significant interaction term (p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Conversely, metabolites such as inosine, dalbergin, and certain unknown metabolites exhibited strong positive correlations with these parameters, which were also highly significant (p < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In particular: “Working duties” and “Change in the institute of reference” are highly significant (p < 0.0001). “Difficulties in the use of technology”, “Family duties”, “Worsening of health conditions”, and “No response” show significant differences with p < 0.05. “Laziness” does not show a significant difference (p > 0.05). 4.
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, comparing adherence trends in the subsamples with comorbid ADHD (n = 117) and without ADHD (n = 62) showed that the association between younger age and poor adherence was highly significant in the subsample with ADHD (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.73, p < .0001) and nonsignificant in the subsample without ADHD (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.80-1.47, p = .6).
highly significantP< 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Preliminary population genomics analysis The non-hierarchical AMOVA carried out on all four community samples for both datasets (BcgI and CspCI) detected a strong signal of genetic structuring across the study area, with highly significant (P< 0.0001) global F ST values of 0.20452 (BcgI) and 0.39327 (CspCI).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
described that the ACQ score significantly decreased from 3.58 ± 1.28 to 2.01 ± 1.05 after 16 weeks (−43.7%), treatment responders showed greater and highly significant improvements of symptoms compared with non-responders even after 16 weeks (−46.9%, p < 0.0001 vs −36.1%, p < 0.05) [ 16 ].
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Population expansions appear to have been more prominent in the southern part of the distribution, with highly significant negative F s values for the Gulf Coast ( F s = −24.98, p < 0.0001), and West Florida ( F s = −13.5, p < 0.0001), and with localities such as Cedar Key (CKFL) and Apalachicola (APFL) representing clear examples.