Compared to sham-NT piglets, HI-NT piglets had a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001) in the ratio of normal-to-total neurons ( Supplementary Material Figure S10B ) and a highly significant increase ( p < 0.0001) in the ratio of ischemic-necrotic-to-total neurons ( Supplementary Material Figure S10A ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Linear contrast tests were all highly significant ( p < 0.0001 ) for all of the MUF values, suggesting a linear increase over time.
A principal components analysis revealed differentiation between populations spawning at different times and in different geographical regions (electronic supplementary material, figure S2), and the first two principal components were highly significant using the Tracy-Widom statistic ( p < 0.0001).
Control), whereas apoVs drove a highly significant miRNA influx (e.g., let-7b-5p, p < 0.0001 vs.
When scores were evaluated, non-parametric ANOVA yielded a highly significant difference among groups (P<0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis test) ( Fig. 1C ).
The Kruskal-Wallis test for clinically isolated bacteria demonstrated a highly significant difference across concentration levels ( p < 0.0001).
Decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were highly significant at 3 and 6 months compared with baseline ( p < 0.0001).
Mean FID in the 714 populations ranged from 1 to 180 m, mean (SE) = 11.46 m (1.03; back-transformed from log 10 -transformed data), with a highly significant effect of species ( F = 3.06, df = 158, 555, R 2 = 0.47, P <0.0001).
Combination of adipocytes and growth factors Cultures in minimal medium again showed a gradual decrease in CD34 + cell survival, however the addition of growth factors induced a highly significant ( p <0.0001) increase in the CD34 + cell proliferation, reaching a maximum at 2 weeks ( Fig. 3 ).
Unsurprisingly, the choice of antibiotic had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.0001, F = 43.0).
Logistic regression analysis further showed a highly significant ( P = 0.0001) inverse correlation between continence achievement rate and baseline incontinence severity. 9 Results of a retrospective analysis of data from the Solifenacin and Tolterodine extended-release as an Active comparator in a Randomised (STAR) trial 10 showed that overactive bladder patien
and C.H.] and a high Spearman correlation coefficient ( = 0.82) and a highly significant (p<0.0001) correlation between measurements was observed.
sclerotiorum populations from the four different countries with the R ST fixation index statistic highly significant ( P < 0.0001) for pairwise combinations of England/Norway ( R ST = 0.094), England/Australia ( R ST = 0.186), Scotland/Norway ( R ST = 0.068), Scotland/Australia ( R ST = 0.152), and Norway/Australia ( R ST = 0.198).
A Mann Witney comparison showed that this difference was highly significant with p < 0.0001 adjusted for ties.
As shown in Table 4 , the model exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001), with the lack-of-fit term yielding a p of 0.3237 (>0.05).
The results of the unpaired T-Test indicate a highly significant statistical difference (t(24) = 8.0312, p < .0001) between the Total Health Budget (THB) and the Estimated Health Expenditures (EHE), with a two-tailed P value of less than 0.0001.
Results Nematode egg counts The FEC showed a highly significant (P<0.0001) seasonal pattern, with the highest values observed in calves after they had been on pasture for eight weeks.
A scatter plot of PIP expression versus that of the PIP-activated metagene across 557 BCa tumors revealed a highly significant positive correlation (r 2 = 0.4; p <0.0001), suggesting that in a clinical setting, PIP most likely regulates genes comprising the PIP-activated metagene as defined in the T47D/shPIP dox culture system ( Figure 2B ).
Type III fixed effects test showed a highly significant (p<0.0001) effect of DxGP on RIN values but no significant effect were observed for G, D and GP on the trait.
Segregating the mice by sex exposed a 4.75-fold increase of Wnt signaling activity in male LRRK2 KO mice and a 4.66-fold increase of Wnt signaling activity in male LRRK2 G2019S KI mice with both effects being highly significant ( P < 0.0001; Fig. 2 B).
While both monotherapies induced a modest increase in CD69 expression, the combination treatment led to highly significant upregulation compared with the vehicle ( p < 0.0001 for CD4+, p = 0.0005 for CD8+, Dunn’s test).
In both instances, the PHASE x TREATMENT interaction was highly significant (p < 0.0001), indicating that ghost crabs responded strongly to the addition of carrion ( Figure 2 , Table 2) .
The concentration of poloxamer 407 exhibited a highly significant effect ( p < 0.0001), while the quadratic term (A2) was also significant ( p = 0.0059).
At the end of 3 weeks; WOMAC score showed highly significant difference within ( P < 0.0001) and significant difference between groups ( P = 0.040) also by Time × group interaction ( P = 0.024), VAS showed highly significant difference within groups ( P < 0.0001).
An unpaired t-test showed the difference to be highly significant p < 0.0001.