“highly significant”

Log-rank analysis of the all-cause morbidity in DIZE-treated males compared to vehicle control was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

At PN50, the resulting blood Pb 2+ levels in these animals was 22.2±0.9 μg dl −1 ( n =47) for Pb 2+ exposed rats and 0.6±0.1 μg dl −1 ( n =64) for control rats, a difference that was highly significant ( P <0.0001).

For frailty in WHAS, the model form does not allow the calculation of a simple R 2 , but the effect of PCA1 remains highly significant with or without control for age ( p <0.0001), and declines from 0.146 to 0.104 frailty criteria.

We identified a highly significant difference of the mean scores between the groups with a p -value of <0.0001.

FA had a highly significant effect on cell viability, explaining 57% of variance (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), while the effect of cort was negligible (1.7% of variance, p = 0.63).

This analysis revealed a highly significant correlation between HLA-presentation and the abundance of the source proteins ( p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5 C ).

Results We identified thirteen loci showing significant differential DNA methylation levels between tumor and non-tumor lung; eight of these show highly significant hypermethylation in adenocarcinoma: CDH13, CDKN2A EX2, CDX2, HOXA1, OPCML, RASSF1, SFPR1, and TWIST1 (p-value << 0.0001).

A highly significant positive correlation was evident between VRS score and NP amplitude (y=0.1069x+1.781, r=0.877, n=60, p<0.0001).

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) were observed between the negative control and the IBV TW-II-infected group, and between the IBV TW-II-infected group and the groups treated with 50 mg/ml LF ( Fig. 12 B).

All dimensions of the SSQ12 questionnaire (Speech, Spatial, Qualities of Hearing, and overall score) revealed highly significant subjective benefit ( p < 0.0001).

4 , with the highly significant difference in the number of cells expressing MAGE C1 in the CD19 + vs CD27 + cell populations ( p -value<0.0001) ( Fig. 4 ).

A statistical significant effect was found for each covariate and the joint test for all covariates was highly significant (p<0.0001).

Retrospective blinded assessment slightly reduced the strength of the association with EVLWI; nevertheless, the correlation remained tight and highly significant (Spearman’s r = 0.72, P < 0.0001) (Figure 3 B).

A highly significant effect of HF (p<0.0001) was observed on adult male retroperitoneal fat weights at cull.

As a result, the difference in mortality remained highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

This is highly significant in both the linear and quadratic term ( p < .0001).

Thus, we can retain hypothesis HG 2 and can, by means of a simple t -test, even show that the difference in means is highly significant ( p < 10 −4 ).

Dietary phosphate intake and the plasma concentration of 24,25(OH) 2 D were not included in multiple regression because of their highly significant and strong correlation with calcium intake (phosphate intake r = 0.87, P < 0.0001 for countries combined) and plasma 25(OH)D (24,25(OH) 2 D r = 0.94, P < 0.0001 for countries combined), respectively.

Friedman's test revealed a highly significant difference among the distributions of the illusion magnitudes across the three conditions [χ 2 (2) = 20.17, p = 0.0001].

Chi-squared comparison of the frequency of mutations in the V genes expressed by hybridomas derived from BP2 transgenic mice revealed the frequency difference between endogenous canonical V H genes and B29 promoter-driven 36-65V H genes present in hybrid loci was highly significant ( P <10 −4 ).

The chi-square statistic was 28.28, which was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated a highly significant survival difference, with high-risk patients showing markedly worse overall survival than those in the low-risk group ( p < 0.0001; Supplementary Figure S4b ).

These differences were highly significant (p < 0.0001) (Lundström et al. 2011 ).

The F = 221.74 implies that the model is highly significant ( P < 0.0001), that is, there is a chance of only 0.01% of the model occur due to noise, as can be seen in Table 2 .

There was also a highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.0001), with the HBV/HDV co-infection group having the highest AST mean value (89.32 IU/L) and the HBV single-infection group having the lowest (41.74 IU/L) ( Table 2 a, Figure 4 ).