Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 1 × 10−40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Across all genomes, ERs were markedly closer in GC content to their host chromosomes than to unrelated chromosomes (median matched GC difference was 3.0%, compared to 10.9% for unmatched pairs), a difference that was highly significant ( p < 1 × 10−4) and associated with a large effect size (Cliff’s δ = −0.63).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These observations were quantitatively corroborated by fluorescence intensity analysis, which revealed a more than 3-fold increase in the FAM channel signal in chemoresistant U251 MG/TMZ cells compared to that in U251 cells, with highly significant statistical differences ( P < 0.0001, Fig. 5E ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Dose-dependent inhibitory effects of the small molecules on T gondii growth The inhibitory activity of the compounds identified through image-based screening was validated by another enzymatic method and the findings revealed a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) in parasite growth depending on the inhibitor presence and concentration used, reflecting an important effect of inhibitors on the intracellular replication of T. gondii using β-galactosidase assays ( Figures 9A, B ).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, regarding the branch of study (pre-clinical (anatomy, biochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology), para-clinical (pathology, microbiology, and radiology), and clinical (surgery, medicine, gynecology, pediatrics, pulmonary medicine, etc.)), a highly significant difference in mean marks was observed, indicating that the branch of study significantly influences BCBR course performance (p = 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant interaction with age (p < 0.0001), such that the association was only observed for younger compared with older individuals: HR 1.27 (1.15-1.39) and HR 1.00 (0.92-1.09) in individuals ≤75 years and >75 years, respectively.