“highly significant”

Notably, Group 1 was enriched for low/medium–low purity, whereas Group 2 was predominantly composed of medium–high/high purity samples, showing a highly significant difference between groups ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).

Pearson’s chi-square test revealed a highly significant difference between groups ( χ 2 (2) = 60.0, p < 0.0001), and Fisher’s exact test was also performed and confirmed the statistical significance of the association ( p < 0.0001).

From the statistical point of view, the fresh biomass accumulation pattern in the roots and shoots exhibited by the two tested varieties was highly significant (at a p ≤ 0.0001 level), indicating the striking inhibitory effects of As stress on developing rice seedlings ( Table 1 ).

These two antigen assays showed a highly significant correlation with a Pearson’s r of 0.96 ( p < 0.0001) ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).

Respiratory coupling above .25 Hz was highly significant ( p < .0001; Figure 3A ), whereas cardiac coupling above 1.7 Hz was modestly significant ( p < .0142; Figure 3B ). 3.1 Risk assessment model The individual seizure values underlying Figure S3 served as features for training a logistic model, producing propensity scores for each seizure, which further distinguished SUDEP from non‐SUDEP cases.

This difference was highly significant during ages 4–9 years ( p < .0001), with the largest cluster volume (664 mm 3 ) in the left parahippocampal gyrus at age 9 years.

Indeed, although a highly significant association was observed between MSI and CD8+ TIL expression (27 MSI CRCs were CD8+ and 34 MSS cases showed CD8 negativity, p = 0.0001), 15 out of 43 MSI tumors (35%) were CD8- (MSI/CD8-) and 12 out of 46 MSS tumors (26%) were CD8+.

The effect of the genotype and pairwise-comparisons between the associated genotypic groups were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) (Fig. 4b ; Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary Data 4 ).

Furthermore, both STED experiments showed, for all cell lines, a highly significant difference from the positive control ( p < 0.0001) using Fisher’s exact.

HIT was considered highly significant to identify areflexic ears ( p = 0.0001) ( Table 4 ).

Data from both laboratories have demonstrated a strong ability to discriminate between positive and negative samples, as indicated by a highly significant p < 0.0001 (Figure 2F ).

This is confirmed by what is shown in Table 9 , where the results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the model as a whole was highly significant ( P < 0.0001), and the model adequacy was confirmed by several statistical indicators.

Similarly, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis followed by log-rank (Mantel–Cox) testing revealed highly significant differences in lifespan among treatment groups fed on SG (χ2 = 67.88, df = 4, p < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis using an unpaired t ‐test (two‐tailed) confirmed a highly significant difference between the two groups (persister‐state: 0.709 ± 0.375 vs. non‐persister‐state: 1.488 ± 0.619, p < 0.0001).

Target correlation was a highly significant predictor for reaction times across all models and both datasets ( p < 0.0001; summary tables for the GAMs can be found in the Supplementary Materials).

Results Body Weight Development Analysis of body weight revealed a pronounced effect of prenatal VPA exposure on somatic development. A two-way ANOVA showed a large and highly significant main effect of Treatment ( F 1,62 = 54.84, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.47), indicating that VPA significantly reduced offspring body weight across the postnatal period ( Figure A).

A p < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant; p < 0.01 (**) highly significant; p < 0.001 (***) extremely significant; p < 0.0001 (****) highly extremely significant. 5.

In addition, while CRP and Neopterin showed a highly significant decline post-treatment regardless of strain ( p < 0.0001 for all), B 2 M showed differential decline depending on strain ( p = 0.0153 for Mtb and p = 0.0048 for Maf ) and levels were still significantly higher at 6 months in Maf compared to Mtb infected subjects ( p = 0.0051).

The data presented in Figures 1(a) and 1(b) demonstrates that there was a highly significant increase in the expression of miR-181a-5p (4.56 ± 0.92-fold change, p < 0.0001) and miR-125b-2-3p (6.39 ± 0.68-fold change, p < 0.0001) in maternal peripheral blood of the RH-HDFN group compared with the control group.

3B ); further statistical analysis revealed a highly significant correlation in antibody titers obtained by PBNA with those by HI or MN (p < 0.0001).

The radiosensitizing effect of VE822, as quantitated by the dose modifying factor (DMF), was highly significant (P<0,0001) for ARID1A - cells but not for ARID1A competent cell lines ( Figure 1B ; Supplement Figure S1 and Table 1 ).

Individuals aged 5 years and older who reported fever in the last 2 weeks had an elevated risk of having malaria infection in both sites, and the association was stronger for the lower transmission: OR = 38.71 (95 % CI 11.08–135.23), and OR = 2.05 (95 % CI 1.07–3.95) in Selembao, with a highly significant interaction term (p < 0.0001).

Meanwhile, statistical analyses revealed a nonsignificant value of the lack of fit ( p > 0.05), and a highly significant level of the model ( p < 0.0001), implying that the mode could be accurately predicted by variation [ 61 ].

When comparing the 3 measures to the environmental stimulus of years of exposure to RHI, all 3 scores were highly significant ( P < .0001) ( Figure 3G ).

These observations were supported by highly significant effects of Period (F (1,17) = 89.00 P < 0.0001), Session (F (7,119) = 28.51, P < 0.0001) and of the Session X Period interaction (F (7,119) = 11.69, P < 0.0001).