“highly significant”

The difference among subgroups was highly significant ( F ratio 214, P < .0001).

Using a two-tailed Chi-squared test with Yates' correction, we found the enrichment to be highly significant (p<0.0001).

The log-rank test for difference across the categories of CBP was highly significant for all of the end points under study ( p <0.0001).

A quadratic relationship between signal and concentration was found to be the best fit and highly significant (p<0.0001 for all 3 exposure times).

The positive correlation between tea consumption and total flavonoids was highly significant, with an R2 = 0.7968 ( p < 0.0001).

Cells expressing the control CYC1 3′UTR reporter showed little difference in the population mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) when Ssd1 was absent (0.87-fold change in expression in ssd1Δ compared to SSD1 ), while cells containing the test CTS1 3′UTR construct exhibited a nearly three-fold, highly significant increase (p<0.0001) in MFI in ssd1Δ cells compared to SSD1 cells ( Figure S1A ).

Across these 25 NVGRP lines, there was highly significant among-line variation in sex ratio (Binomial GLM: F 24,918 = 15.244, P < 0.0001).

In the GAM analysis simultaneously including GH and PE cases ( Figure 3C ), the smooth term of gestational week interacting with maternal log(UA) was highly significant (edf = 5.51, χ2 = 662.3, p < 0.0001).

2 ) shows a very good fit to the data and all models were highly significant (p<0.0001, Table 3 ).

Statistically, there is a significant difference ( p < 0.05) in the length of bradyzoites and a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) in the width of bradyzoites ( Figures 2G , H ) between sheep and goats.

Together, these results depicted that the obtained linear model was highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001) and a lack of fit showed no significance ( p -value > 0.05).

Parasite inbreeding The analysis of the monoclonal samples (n = 136) showed a highly significant overall LD ( I A s = 0.51, p < 0.0001) indicating a clonal population.

The models were highly significant (p<0.0001) with a non-significant lack of fit (p=0.2729 and 0.1283, respectively).

The difference in OS between the LTS and STS patients was highly significant (HR = 0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.07; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1 B).

This analysis revealed highly significant main effects of dose (F 4,160 ≈ 848.5, p < 0.0001), wavelength (F 1,160 ≈ 252.2, p < 0.0001), and cellular age-status (F 1,160 ≈ 1466.8, p < 0.0001), indicating that metabolic activity varied significantly with PBM fluence, irradiation source, and replicative aging.

This bootstrap analysis showed that the number of genes corepressed by EZH2 and miRNAs was indeed highly significant ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ).

Differences in tumor recurrence was highly significant for both SK-MEL-28 and MM649 (p<0.0001, Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test).

Among the participants, we found highly significant differences between the two towns in both FT 4 and TPOAb ( p < 0.0001), but not in TSH ( Table 2 ).

By applying Design Expert 8.0.7.1 to fit a multiple regression to the data, the quadratic equation of Schisandra chinensis AC yield (Y) to each factor variable can be obtained as: (1) Y = 1.11 + 0.14 A + 8.3 × 10 - 3 B + 0.14 C + 0.067 A B + 0.098 A C + 0.15 B C - 0.21 A 2 - 0.16 B 2 - 0.29 C 2 The results of the regression model analysis shown in Table 7 indicate that this quadratic multinomial regression model had highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001), indicating a highly significant correlation between the three independent variables involved and the response values of AC.

edulis extracts inhibited HIV-1 protease activity highly significant ( p < 0.0001) at each time point during the linear curve ( R 2 = 0.9974) in a typical dose response manner.

The effect of coating (B-S, M-S, F-S, P-S), test substrate (glass or OTS-SAM coated glass) and treatment conditions (air or water) was highly significant (df = 16, F = 22.7982, p ≤ 0.0001*) as were many of the interactions, including the three-way interaction of coating*surface*treatment ( SI Text, section 3, Table S4 ).

In 88.1% of all examined samples ( n = 52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.1 - 95.1%) the two diagnostic methods rendered differing results, and the McNemar test for paired observations showed highly significant differences of the detection frequency ( P < 0.0001).

Differences were considered significant when p<0.01 (*), and highly significant when p<0.0001 (***).

Using the OPSCC TCGA cohort we demonstrated that HPV-associated tumors abundantly overexpress CDKN2A RNA with an average of 34-fold elevation ( Supplementary Table 6 in S1 Table s) that is highly significant (p < 0.0001, S7 Fig B ).

ANOVA showed that both season (i.e., autumn and spring) and population had a highly significant effect on mass-specific energy content of lipid and glycogen stores ( P << 0.0001; Table S2 ).