“highly significant”

The tests of zero amplitude were highly significant ( P value < 0.0001) for every HRV variable, suggesting a significant circadian variation.

CBL was found to cause a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) improvement in the students’ higher levels of cognition, whereas the lower orders of cognition remained unaffected ( P = 0.2048).

Nematode feeding groups When all samples were assigned into four groups by feeding type ( Table 1 ), analysis of variance showed highly significant differences in δ 15 N ( p < 0.0001) between the plant feeder and other feeders and in δ 13 C (F 3;33 = 24.18 p < 0.0001) between all groups.

A more detailed analysis of donor and recipient age based on a recipient age of < and ≥ 55 years and a donor age of < vs ≥ 30 years revealed a highly significant impact on long term outcome in the comparison of these four categories ( P < 0.0001, Figure 4 ).

Lipid Synthesis and Transcriptional Control ( Figure 9 b) For lipid metabolism-related transcription factors, Srebf1 showed a highly significant phase effect (F(1, 25) = 24.42, p < 0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.49, q = 0.0001), with higher expression at ZT3 than at ZT15, and a trend toward an exercise effect (F(1, 25) = 3.72, p = 0.0653, partial η 2 = 0.13) that was not confirmed after FDR adjustment.

The inclusion of modules A, P, M, and N in the VCogM model had a highly significant impact on the model's Top‐1 Accuracy ( p ‐value < 0.0001), while module U also had a significant impact on the VCogM model's performance ( p ‐value < 0.01).

Results We observed a highly significant decrease in the presence of the KIR2DS2 and KIR2DS4 genes (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.05-0.41, P = 0.0001; OR = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.02-0.2, P = 0.000, respectively) and in the presence of the KIR2DL5A gene (OR = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.02-0.14, P = 0.0000) in the TC group compared to the HC group.

All these differences were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Concerning aerated areas, the results showed highly significant differences in the attenuation values for both lungs in sedated animals compared to those during spontaneous breathing under anesthesia ( p < 0.0001) and during induced apnea ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).

All dependent variables were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) to the independent variables studied, apart from the β-carotene which was non-significant ( p > 0.05).

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups one month after surgery (p = 0.124), but there were highly significant differences between the groups at two months (66.0 ± 28.7 vs. 40.4 ± 17.5, p < 0.0001), six months (80.0 ± 19.4 vs. 51.0 ± 18.2, p < 0.0001) and 12 months (87.3 ± 16.8 vs. 55.0 ± 33.2, p < 0.005) (Figure 3 A).

We observed a highly significant inverse correlation between these parameters with both Pearson’s and Spearman’s tests (r = −0.617 and r = −0.611, respectively; P <0.0001) (Figure 2 ).

This analysis revealed a highly significant effect of condition, F (2, 78) = 19.2, P < 0.0001.

[ 4 b] gives: 8 which is a highly significant relationship ( p < 0,0001, see Fig. 4 ).

When the data from all five experiments are pooled, this reduction is very highly significant ( P <0.0001).

In addition, the Chi-squared test demonstrated a highly significant association between SIRS and complications (χ 2 = 21.01, DF = 2, p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).

Expression strengths were similar between groups at baseline ( P = .4561), and while controls did not change significantly over time ( P = .4926) there was a highly significant increase in signature 2 strength in patients ( P < .0001), with significant differences between the groups at M12 ( P = .0047) and M24 ( P = .0086).

The doe parity effect was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) on TD and DMY, while it was non-significant ( p > 0.05) on UW, UD, UC, UDG, and UV.

The differences between the control and FRET situations were highly significant (p<0.0001).

Cryoprecipitate use followed a similar trend, showing a highly significant p - value [ p < .0001] and providing strong evidence against the null hypnosis.

This model was highly significant (p<10 −4 ) and explained 7.5% of the variation in African ancestry levels between individuals (adjusted R 2 ).

This difference in the pattern of discordant classification in the Joslin and FinnDiane cohorts was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

The type of basal medium was also highly significant (F Value = 67; p<0.0001), though much less so than PGR, with more shoots regenerated on MS medium than WPM.

On the other hand, the results of Bartlett’s test were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

* p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, very significant; *** p < 0.001, highly significant; **** p < 0.0001, extremely significant; n.s., not significant.