“highly significant”

In the seated position, a moderately strong positive correlation was observed (r 2 = 0.34), which was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 3 ).

Relationship between geographic, morphological, and molecular affinities There was a highly significant association between Nei's ( 1972 ) genetic distance and geographic distance ( r 2 = 0.370, P < 0.0001) indicating that isolation-by-distance and genetic drift is an important process in the E. globulus species complex.

MVD was positively related to HIF-1α expression in BRCA1-2 carriers (r = 0.521, p = 0.006), and, in particular, we observed a highly significant correlation in the familial group (r = 0.421, p<0.0001).

A paired t -test between percentage of correctly identified learned versus new PPPs revealed a highly significant difference [ t (32) = -6,453, p < .0001] indicating a better selection performance for new pairings.

The variables showed highly significant marginal effect ( P <0.0001) except age ( Table 4 ).

These analyses collectively illustrate a clear separation between the two intensity conditions, despite considerable distributional overlap, highlighting the robust influence of stimulus intensity on the ratings. Turning to the stimulus duration factor, it had a highly significant main effect on duration ratings, F (1, 728) = 199.45, p <.0001, η p 2 = 0.17 (Table 4 ), also confirming the hypothesis.

The activity of each tested caspase increased linearly after incubation with palmitic acid, becoming highly significant starting from 8 h (p<0.0001) ( Figure 4A ).

We observed a highly significant correlation between genetic (Fst) and geographical distances (Mantel’s test, P-value < 0.0001, S3 Fig ) between populations (sites) of B. tabaci SSA1 SG1 U SG2 (this Mantel test was not performed on B. tabaci SG3 or SSA2 ∪ SSA3 due to low sample sizes).

Highly significant differences between pre- and post-weaning piglets were found ( P = 0.0001, P = 0.001 and P = 0.0001, for Envfit, Anosim and Adonis tests, respectively).

Results The difference between ages of the two groups was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

An unpaired t test (for two-groups comparison) and ANOVA test (for multi-group comparison) were used in statistical analysis ( ∗ , p < 0.05, significant; ∗∗ , p < 0.01, very significant; ∗∗∗ , p < 0.001, highly significant; ∗∗∗∗ , p < 0.0001, extremely significant; ns, p > 0.05, not significant).

A slight decreasing trend of malaria mortality was observed over the whole study period which is however highly significant (p = 0.0001).

Model 3 addressed questions three and four, and fits significantly better than model 2 (likelihood-ratio chi-square = 16855.689–16712.490 = 143.2, which on 9 degrees of freedom is highly significant, p<0.0001).

Overall, the discrimination between three groups (H, K and C) was highly significant (Wilks’ Lambda: 0.0354; F (16,216) = 58.247; p < 0.0001).

Sex had a highly significant association ( p = 0.0001) with HRBs.

When the mean PSS scores among different demographics were compared between phase I and phase II period, all the demographics showed highly significant results ( P < 0.0001) and the higher value of mean PSS was reported in phase II period [ Table 2 ].

The most highly significant ( P < 0.0001) were SSI, vasculopathy, previous LEA, and white blood cell count >11,000 per mm 3 .

However, that for the ‘Fiction’ condition is highly significant (r 2 = 0.388; F 1,39 = 24.75, p < 0.0001).

RSM design – Model fitting and validation The results of ANOVA indicated that the models for all responses were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

The quadratic terms (A2, B2, and C2) were all highly significant ( p < 0.0001), affirming the nonlinear behavior of the system.

A statistically highly significant association between HSV-2 seropositivity and increasing parity was found ( P = 0.0001). 1.38% of primiparous females and 25.64% of multiparous females tested positive.

Improvement in thyroid profile (increase in fT3 and fT4 and decrease in TSH) at 6 weeks and 12 weeks was seen both in the morning group as well as in the evening, and it was highly significant in comparison with their baseline thyroid function ( P value <.0001).

3.2 Seed germination trials Overall, the comparisons of the seed germination between the treatments and experimental control were highly significant ( F (3, 1316) = 7.6; p < .0001; Figure 4 ).

The difference was highly significant at P <0.0001.

This was a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) difference.