“highly significant”

S6 ), a highly significant slope ( P < 0.0005) and insignificant intercept ( P > 0.2).

This corresponds to a highly significant increase (p = 0.0005).

GRP78 attracted our attention due to its high protein amount found in sparsely growing cells, and its highly significant difference in the two growth patterns (SW480: 3.3-fold, p = 0.0005, Figure 1B a, b, c ; HCT116: 2-fold, p = 0.0005, Figure 1B d, e, f ; single analyzed 2-DE areas are shown in Figure S1B ).

It is unclear why the rate of transduction should differ for Cx36 −/− and Gnat1 −/− cones; the difference was however highly significant (p < 0.0005) and could in some way reflect the better space clamp of the Cx36 −/− cones in the absence of electrotonic spread of current through gap junctions.

These differences were highly significant at steps A, C and D (F = 20.97; 43.18 and 48.37 respectively; P < 0.0005) in the St-Marcellin's process, at steps A', B' and D' (F = 326; 37; P < 0.0005 and F = 11.3; P < 0.01, respectively) in Brie's process.

An NSF activity assay based on fluorescence dequenching (see “Methods”) shows a highly significant, ~72% reduction in the rate of SNARE complex disassembly ( p = 0.0005 ; Fig. 8D ).

Comparison between rapamycin and HI treatment revealed opposed effects with highly significant difference ( p = 0.0005; Figure 5A ).

The mean age among females was five years higher than that in males (59.9 versus 54.9 years), which is a highly significant observation (P < 0.0005).

These differences were highly significant (paired t-test, p < 0.0005 for both comparisons).

The correlations between “behavioral apathy” scores and signal change as P (yes) increased were still highly significant after controlling for individuals akaike information criterion (partial correlations, SMA: r = 0.562, P < 0.0005; ccz: r = 0.555, P < 0.0005; and M1: r = 0.489, P = 0.002).

For the ADH3 gene, the ethanol and galactose media were highly significant (each p ≤ 0.0005) in comparison to glucose, which has zero effect by parametrization.

In both cases, time at 8°C, brood number and the interaction between these variables were highly significant ( P <0.0005), but reproductive output did not differ significantly between flies kept with or without food (2–14 d; P = 0.6) or housed in different kinds of vials with food (0–20 d; P = 0.3), and there were no significant interactions between housing conditions and the other variables.

Statistical analysis of the data confirmed a highly significant reduction in the spindle size (degrees of freedom [DF] = 63; P = 5×10−4) and a significant increase in the lengths of cilia (DF = 147; P = 3×10−3; Figure 4E ).

Pairwise Spearman's correlation coefficients ( r s ) for individual variables were also all positive and highly significant ( P < 0.0005, or P = 0.001 in the case of TLR2 versus TLR7 responses), with r s of between 0.29 and 0.68.

The analysis of variance of the mean SGN densities in deafened ears showed highly significant differences both for the total cochlear ( p = 0.0005) and for the basal region ( p < 0.0001) when compared with NH.

The generated explanatory model showed that across all four responses, the highly significant ( P < 5 × 10 –4 ) factors and interactions were the ON/OFF stability (ΔΔ G ) of the anti-RBS-RBS hairpin, the interaction between TIR and hairpin ΔΔ G , TIR, and IPTG concentration ( Supplementary Table 6 ).

These correlations, although weak (r– 0.17, r– 0.14 and r– 0.24, respectively), were highly significant (p = 0.0005, p = 0.005 and p<0.0001, respectively), ( Table 3 ).

Results showed that there was a strong positive correlation between growth rate and pathogen virulence (as evaluated by relative lesion height), which was very highly significant ( r = 0.817, n = 10, p < 0.0005).

In the 1-h period before tetanization, there were no overall differences in mean fEPSP slope values elicited by stimulation of left versus right CA3 [ipsilateral Schaffer collateral: left CA3 = −1.09 ± 0.13 mV/ms; right CA3 = −1.18 ± 0.10 mV/ms; contralateral commissural: left CA3 = −0.76 ± 0.06 mV/ms; right CA3 = −0.72 ± 0.09 mV/ms; overall left versus right comparison: F (1,74) = 0.07; p = 0.79], but a highly significant difference between the fEPSP slopes elicited by contralateral (crossed) versus ipsilateral (uncrossed) CA3 stimulation [ F (1,74) = 15.3; p < 0.0005].

The differences between Lucky Strike Straight Blue and Lucky Strike Original Blue were highly significant (p≤0.0005), and between Lucky Strike Original Red and Lucky Strike Original Blue significant too (p<0.05).

This difference was highly significant (n = 3, p < 0.0005).

After ordering each of the three methods from highest scored country to the lowest scored country for each domain and disease, Spearman's rank test showed highly significant ( p < .0005) correlations among all three of the scoring methods (Figure 4 ).

Nature of employment and statistical topic were highly significant predictors of choice of the practice of statistics as a required competency ((F = 3.777, p < 0.0005) and (F = 45.834, p < 0.0005), respectively).

The difference in the number of mice developing an amebic liver abscess between HDP-1 immunized SCID mice and SCID mice receiving antibody EH5 was highly significant ( P <0.0005).

Difference between the mean values of the WFs for the four shortest and four longest ICIs proved to be highly significant [ t (9) = 7.21, p < 0.0005].