“highly significant”

Publication Bias Egger's test revealed the presence of a highly significant publication bias ( z = 3.51, p = 0.0005).

The differences were highly significant (χ 2 (2) = 23.42, p < 0.0005).

Furthermore, patients with a BNI score > 1 demonstrated a highly significant reduction in pain medication needed ( p < 0.0005). 3.3.

Similarly, post-BCG vaccination, there was a highly significant increase in BCG-specific CD4 + and CD8 + Ki67 + IFN-γ + , TNF-α + , IL-2 + and IL-17 + T cells, P < 0 .0005 ( P = 0 .003 for CD8 + IL-17 + T cells).

This value was highly significant when compared to those of normals (t = 8.68, P < .0005) (Figure 1 ).

crudilactis species presented highly significant variations (p < 0.0005).

This relationship remained highly significant even after accounting for phylogenetic non-independence in our PGLS model (solid black line, t = −3.737, p-value = 0.0005).

Results The regression analysis indicated a large and highly significant Roemer effect (t = 5.6, p<.0005; see Table 3 ).

The results showed highly significant ( p < 0.0005) measures of absolute agreement for all test comparisons [ 9 ].

- In the text Pg 17 it says that the Abd-B wild type and Abd-B w protein rescuing ability of A7 suppression is very similar, but in Fig 6E it marks the interaction as highly significant (p<0.0005).

A chi square test with Monte Carlo simulation for the counting data resulted in a highly significant association between species and cultures with P = 0.0005, revealing that the ensemble was equivalent to more than one biocultural unit.

The difference was highly significant for the lumbo-sacral segment ( p < 0.0005).

The difference in the estimated proportions of homicide recidivists between published and unpublished data was highly significant (Q-value = 19.5, df = 1, p < 0.0005).

Mean v1.0 scores for these successful vs unsuccessful quitters displayed highly significant differences (p = 0.0005, one tailed t test) ( Fig 1 ).The quit success scores were significantly higher in the successful quitters than in the matched comparison group of nonquitters in ways that were not readily explained by several other comparisons ( Supplementary analysis E ).

In a multivariable analysis of EFS including pre-transplant IDDA v2.1 ≤ 14 / ≥15 and HCT-CI ≤ 2 / ≥3 and the interaction between these prognostic factors, as well as age at transplant and date of transplant, neither IDDA v2.1 ( p = 0.059, HR = 4.6) nor HCT-CI ( p = 0.057, HR = 7.1) were independently significant, but the interaction between these two factors combined (HCT-CI ≥ 3 and IDDA v2.1 ≥ 15) was highly significant ( p = 0.0005, HR = 18.0), Fig. 3 H.

In particular, obtained from an allele-based case–control comparison, the top-ranking SNP, rs3800231, of FOXO3A had a highly significant ( p < 0.0005) OR of 1.42 (CI: 1.18–1.70).

Posterior cranial base model This model explained a greater proportion of the variance (R2 =0.211; adjusted R2 = 0.185) and was highly significant ( p = 0.0005).

Although we did not look at the ratio of plasma tryptophan to other large neutral amino acids, the differences between total blood plasma tryptophan levels with (5–8 μmol/L) and without (51–182 μmol/L) ATD were highly significant ( p < 0.0005, Wilcoxon rank-sum test).

Fasting PG day0 demonstrated a highly significant, batch-adjusted correlation with A1C day0 ( n = 43, r = 0.65, P < 0.0005, and 95% CI 0.48–0.81).

The analysis of population structure by means of Wright’s [ 23 ] F ST statistic (0.42) was highly significant ( P = 5x10 -4 ).

We correlated the tdTomato/YFP ratios with survival time and noticed that infected cells with a shorter survival time tended to be cells with a low ratio of tdTomato/YFP expression (Figure 6 B), and Spearman test resulted in a highly significant correlation index (r = 0.28, p = 0.0005), arguing that LSEC-uniLT that expressed relatively more YFP than tdTomato lysed earlier than cells that expressed more tdTomato.

We found a highly significant relationship between antidepressant use and eclampsia, OR 2.84 ( p < 0.0005, CI 2.06 – 3.92), unchanged when compared with the depressed/anxious cohort: OR 2.84 ( p < 0.0005, CI 2.06 – 3.92).

Nevertheless, the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0005) at all the time points.

This relationship was fit using gamma regression and a log link, the results of which were highly significant (p < 0.0005, Supplementary Fig.

We found no significant main effects of trial type or maze region but did find a highly significant trial type x maze region interaction (F 1,4047 = 33, p < 0.0005).