“highly significant”

Postoperative visual analog scale score was 4.8 ± 1.12 in Group BN, and in Group BF, it was 3.86 ± 1.04 which was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.0007).

The interaction of clade × latitude was also highly significant ( p = 0.0007), indicating that the two evolutionary lineages respond differently in their timing of adult activity at different latitudes.

On the other hand, in capsicum, fertigation treatments showed a highly significant effect on yield parameters ( p = 0.0007) and irrigation water use efficiency ( p = 0.0123) (Table 3 ).

the everyday foot score was highly significant ( P = 0.0007).

Given the large population, this difference was highly significant (p = 0.0007).

For TPC, the quadratic model was highly significant (F = 32.20, p = 0.0007; Table 2 ), indicating that the model adequately describes the relationship between extraction variables and phenolic recovery.

There was also a highly significant difference in the minimum CT values between the tumor recurrence and granuloma groups (15.67±5.113 vs. −17.17±4.826, P=0.0007) and in the floating range CT values (148.00±5.471 vs. 88.11±7.671, P<0.0001), respectively.

Moreover, we found a highly significant positive correlation of the network gamma oscillations (power×duration) with the SWR-area increase (R = 0.58, n = 30, p=0.0007) and no correlation with the SWR incidence (R = −0.28, n = 30, p=0.14).

Interestingly, IL-27 levels showed a moderate (R = 0.3781) albeit highly significant ( p = 0.0007) correlation with sPD-L1 levels, suggestive of a potential role for IL-27 in PD-L1 upregulation in vivo ( Figure 3 B).

Also brain tumors and/or sarcomas were overrepresented in the carrier families (28.6%, Table 2 ); the difference being highly significant when compared to the incidence of these cancers in the analyzed cohorts (5.1%, P = 0.0007, OR 7.4 95% CI 2.7–19.9).

In accord, we observed far fewer falls from the pole at 120 days in the 5b than placebo group, and the 2‐way ANOVA showed a highly significant interaction of pole duration and treatment ( F 2,33 = 9.084, p = 0.0007) .

However, the difference between the two classes of herd size was highly significant in Gulu (75 % vs. 48 %; P = 0.0007), but not in in Kampala (86 % vs. 71 %; P = 0.15).

This strategy led to a highly significant 3‐fold decrease in gonocyte viability compared to equivalent populations of untreated cells ( P = .0007) (Figure 7A ).

This difference was highly significant (p = 0.0007), which indicated that the time that was necessary for bone healing was significantly increased (p = 0.0008).

Results There was a highly significant positive correlation between the two sets of antibodies ( r s = 0.621; P = 0.0007).

Accordingly, while changes in scar mass mirrored changes in infarct size, viable tissue mass increased in CDC-treated patients (+13.0 ± 11.4 g at 6 mo), but not in controls (+0.9 ± 6.2 g at 6 mo), and the correlation between scar shrinkage and increased viability was highly significant (r = -0.59, p = 0.0007).

IBD among the NE Atlantic samples from the Bay of Biscay to the Canary Islands (including the Alboran Sea) was highly significant ( r = 0.903, P = 0.0007; matrix 7×7).

The poor responder group also had increasing IL-8 between BL and W12 ( p = 0.041) with a highly significant increase observed between W6 and W12 ( p = 0.0007), not seen in those who had a reduction in CST.

Postoperative visual analog scale score was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.0007) in nalbuphine group as compared to fentanyl group.[ 26 ] The limitation of the present study would be a small sample size.

Mice receiving iNO showed a modest but reproducible and highly significant enhancement in survival (p = 0.0007; Figure 1A ) compared to control mice breathing air alone.

The differences were highly significant at both 12 (P =0.0007) and 24 (P = 0.0115) weeks between the two groups.

After accounting for the effect of network size on N (type-2 regression: N = 0.59+0.077*logSize, F 1,57 = 9.98, P<0.0025), differences between network types were highly significant (F 2,56 = 8.21, P<0.0007) and pair-wise comparisons discriminated comensalistic networks from antagonistic and mutualistic ones (Scheffé-test: P<0.0009 and P<0.029, respectively), which differed marginally between themselves (P>0.052).

Pairwise comparisons showed a highly significant increase in similarity in PK pairs (PK: paired: M = 0.03, SD = 0.04; shuffled: M = −0.01, SD = 0.02; t (18) = 4.1, P = 0.0007, CI: [0.018–0.058], Cohen’s d = 0.94).

The difference between median values was highly significant ( p = 0.0007; Figure 4 ).

s'l'+l'l' ), a highly significant genotype effect was also observed (F 1, 155 = 11.9, p = 0.0007).