“highly significant”

The correlation between the two variables is highly significant ( r = 0.43, P < 0.001).

Similarly, a highly significant effect was observed for the sum of EAs ( F = 15.493, p < 0.001), suggesting a strong association between the regional factor and the accumulation of EAs.

The two-way ANOVA indicated highly significant ( p < 0.001) effects of both salinity and the salinity × hormones interaction on shoot and root FW and DW.

However, the average neurite extension of unperfused growth cones dropped from 12.8 + 1.2 t~m (SEM) during the l-h control period to -3.1 + 1.8 #m (SEM) during the 1-hperfusion period, which was highly significant (P < 0.001, two-tall paired t test).

T-DNA insertions in the HSP90.2 and HSP90.3 constitutive isoforms yielded a highly significant overrepresentation of seedlings with narrow leaves and delayed development (p<<0.001 for both lines, χ 2 test), as observed with four of the HSP90-RNAi lines.

Using Cohen's kappa coefficient to compare the agreement between RDT and microscopy, a fair but highly significant agreement ( k = 0.259; p < 0.001) was found.

When the data are analyzed without including the cluster of 11gold particles in the MOPC 21 sample, the difference between MOPC 21 and a-actinin is highly significant (P < .001).

Although the a * values of the yogurt samples increased or decreased irregularly during storage, statistical analysis showed that the effect of storage time and dried kefir grain addition on the a * values was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001).

The results showed that the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value was always above 0.50, that Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and that the amount of variance explained by the single factor was always substantial, ranging from 36% to 62%.

Amongst the proteins in the LRU group were several cytokines and chemokines ( Supplementary Table S1 ), including C-C motif chemokine 4 (Ccl4), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), C-X-C motif chemokine 10 (Cxcl10), C-C motif chemokine 2 (Ccl2), and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), which all showed significant ( p -value < 0.05) or highly significant ( p -value < 0.001) increases in their average intensity when compared to either the Con or the LT treatment group ( Figure 4 B, Supplementary Table S1 ).

One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test was used to determine significance ( p ≤ 0.05, significant; p ≤ 0.01, very significant or p ≤ 0.001, highly significant) using GraphPad Prism Version 9 (GrapPad software, San Diego, CA, USA). 3.

Nutritional composition and water productivity differences ( Table 3 ) largely informed highly significant ( p < 0.001) and significant ( p < 0.05) differences in NWP Starch, Ca, Cu, K, Na, Fe, Mg, P and Zn observed in the interaction of seasons by genotypes ( Table 5 ).

With regard to completion time, we observed a highly significant (p <0.001) statistical difference between the time needed to complete the SFES scale (about 7 mins) and the time needed to complete the question on cohabitation status (about 10 s) ( Table S3 ).

In all the cases, the LRTs were highly significant ( p -values < 0.001).

The expression levels of ENO3 , FABP4 , FADS2 , FAT1 , and ITIH3 in the MAFLD dataset showed very highly significant differences among the different groups ( p < 0.001).

The results revealed a highly significant difference in infection rates among different counties and seasons ( p < 0.001), while the difference among different age groups was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating the presence of diverse epidemic characteristics of Cryptosporidium in camels in Yili Prefecture.

About systemic and gastrointestinal symptoms ( Table 2 ), a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.001) of stool blood, abdominal pain, and fatigue was reported at 12 months after surgery.

In all three groups, the correlation between LLVA and standard VA remained highly significant (controls: ρ = 0.81, P < 0.001; choroideremia: ρ = 0.84, P < 0.001; and RGPR -associated RP: ρ = 0.70, P = 0.001).

The p value criteria used in the figures are as follows: * p < 0.05 presents a significant difference, ** p < 0.01 shows a highly significant difference, and *** p < 0.001 shows an extremely significant difference. 3.

Notably, all other analyzed MTXs also showed a highly significant reduction in ROS level in a similar range (theophylline: 54.5% ± 4.8%, p ≤ 0.001; pentoxifylline: 48.8% ± 3.2%, p ≤ 0.001; theobromine: 39.6% ± 2.7%, p ≤ 0.001; propentofylline: 34.4% ± 7.4%, p ≤ 0.001) ( Supplement Figure S4d ).

Statistical analysis of mean grain densities indicated that the difference between the grain density over fused membranes (+GTP) and that over unfused vesicles (GTP) was highly significant (P < 0.001) and remained significant (P < 0.001) after corrections for section thickness effect (23).

Statistical significance was evaluated based on adjusted P values (FDR), with thresholds set as follows: P < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 (**) indicated a highly significant difference, and P < 0.001 (***) denoted an extremely significant difference.

For our primary outcomes measures, we found a highly significant difference in PCL-S scores between W1 and W7 for both the propranolol group [ t (28) = 5.683 p < 0.001] and the placebo group [ t (28) = 7.410 p < 0.001] (Fig. 2A ).

The mean length-to-width ratio varied from 1.520 -+ 0.376 SD to 1.858 +- 0.678 and always showed a highly significant increase (P < 0.001) over nonsheared controls (1.111 --_ 0.143 to 1.187 - 0.250).

The total number of significant pairwise haplotypes detected by Fisher's exact test was 108 out of which 12 were highly significant (P < 0.001) by Bonferoni procedure ( Table 3 ).