“highly significant”

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference among the groups ( p = 0.001).

Statistically highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed within the categories of HCPs comparing perception about COVID-19 between doctors versus MLSS, and nurses versus MLSS, not between doctors versus nurses.

At Day 14 the difference between control and 3-0 ug/ml was significant (P <0.001) and the difference between 3 0 ug/ml and 10 0 ,Ag/ml was also highly significant (P < 0 001) (using Student's t-test).

CNS relapse did not produce a significant decrease in remission length (P greater than 0.1) but reduction in survival after CNS relapse was highly significant (P = 0.001).

Total post-test scores were highly significant (P < 0.001) than pre-test scores.

Applying a chi‐square text on the genotypes NN and NC observed in the first five years (from 2009 to 2013) versus the last five years (from 2014 to 2018), we obtained a value highly significant ( p < 0.001), so that the number of carrier subjects observed from 2014 to 2018 is significantly lower if compared to the one observed in the first five years.

Another highly significant difference exists for alkaline phosphatase at 0-3 months, between Groups III and IV (with skeletal and hepatic metastases) and all the other groups (P = 0 001).

All classification models of each data set generated a highly significant p -value ( p ≤ 0.001) in the permutation test after the SFFS (apart from the Decision Tree) for all three data sets.

The doxorubicin treated rats showed a highly significant increase of the urinary enzyme activity from the first to seventh day ( P <0.001).

al condition, high or moderate physical status, absence or presence of a post-operative complication, minimal dysphagia vs moderate or severe, and the sex of the patient (median survival is longer in women). Analysis of survival by the Life Table/Log Rank method showed the following to be highly significant variables (P < 0.001) opera- 49 tion, presence or absence of post operative complication, decision to explore or palliate, physical status and performance status.

The test shows a very highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in mean flexural strength between the groups, rejecting the null hypothesis [ Table 2 ].

Tooth Color Change (ΔE) A highly significant difference in ΔE (color change) was found among the groups (F = 85.693; p < 0.001), with a large effect size (η 2 = 0.783; 95% CI: 0.696–0.825).

Every experiment was conducted at least thrice, and differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 or highly significant when p < 0.001.

The Spear- man rank correlation coefficient (rs) of 0S81 was highly significant (P<0.001).

Differences were considered to be significant if P <.05 and highly significant if P <.001.

Statistical analyses revealed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001).

The DR group showed a highly significant increase ( P < 0.001) in the TAC after 1 week and 2 weeks with a percentage change of 79.0% and 45.2%.

Cumulative survival for mice in Experiments 1-5 (Table III). mice was highly significant (P < 0 001, Breslow test).

Furthermore, the longer duration of mechanical ventilation was shown to be a highly significant risk factor (p < 0.001).

The advertisement of plastic surgeons' work had a highly significant positive effect (B = 1.034, p < 0.001, Exp(B) = 2.812, 95%CI [1.656, 4.774]), suggesting that exposure to such advertisements increased the likelihood of considering facial cosmetic surgery nearly threefold.

This is a statistic- ally highly significant relationship (P < 0.001) and the difference in mean lymphocyte count for the 4 DNCB grades is ascribable to a linear trend by analysis of variance (P < 0-001).

All parameters showed highly significant changes during the study (repeated-measures ANOVA, P < 0.001, except MAP, P < 0.01).

A univariable extended Cox regression ( Table 2 ) demonstrated a strong and highly significant association between FRS (in percent) and graft failure (hazard ratio (HR): 1.04, 95%CI: 1.02–1.06, p < 0.001, model 1), indicating a 4% increased risk of developing graft failure over the course of 10 years, per percentage increase in the FRS.

The correlation between PFO and ischemia lesion incidence Due to the potential role of PFO in brain ischemia lesions, we analyzed the correlation between PFO and brain ischemia lesions in PFO and control groups and found a highly significant increase in the percentage of cases with brain ischemia lesions in the PFO group compared with the control group (p < 0.001).

leontopetaloides -derived compounds, the novel compound Tarkalynin A ( 1 ) displayed the most promising activity, but again with a highly significant separation between the Trypanozoon and Nannomonas subgenera ( p < 0.001), as EC 50 values against the former ranged between 21.4 μM ( T. equiperdum ) and 46.0 μM for T. evansi , whereas the compound was almost inactive against T. congolense (EC 50 = 246 μM).