(2021) reported highly significant pain reductions (F = 34.5, p < 0.001) and Radha et al.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
[3] reported a highly significant Previous-Trial Congruency by Current-Trial Congruency interaction, F (1, 109) = 42.10, p < 0.001 at the 1000 ms RSI across language groups.
The categorical analysis of soluble protein was highly significant in stress types ( p = 0.001), study types ( p = 0.001), and maize varieties ( p = 0.02).
Compared with healthy mice, sensitization with HDM led to a highly significant increase in total immune cell numbers of asthmatic mice (PBS: 0.18 ± 0.05 × 10 6 cells/mL; HDM: 1.34 ± 0.16 × 10 6 cells/mL, p < 0.001) with eosinophils from 0.00 ± 0.00% to 57.45 ± 1.84% ( p < 0.001).
The reduction in the CFUs recovered from lungs of the aP- aP-, aP- OMV P-, and aP-wP–immunized mice ranged from 2.9 to 3.6 orders of magnitude (non-significant differences between those treatments) in comparison to the highly significant difference relative to non-immunized animals ( p < 0.001).
The result revealed a significant IBD effect ( P < 0.05) in the XJ–KZ and XJ–MGL regions ( r = 0.3822, P = 0.0249 and r = 0.4786, P = 0.0196, respectively), especially a highly significant relevance at the species level ( r = 0.6024, P < 0.001, Table 4 ).
This is evidenced by the highly significant F-values (p<0.001) in the repeated measures ANOVA for the experimental group across all domains.
There was a very strong and highly significant correlation (r = 0.905, p < 0.001; Spearman test, Fig. 1 ) between the actual INR and estimated INR values, with a maximum difference in INR of 0.2 units, which is not clinically significant.
The DFHM-workload index gave stable results with highly significant correlations between scenarios with similar traffic-load conditions ( r between 0.671 and 0.809, p ≤ 0.001).
In our study, mean blood glucose (fasting) was 204 ± 18.01 mg/dl and 103.5 ± 17.37 mg/dl in Type 1 depressed and nondepressed cases, respectively, and the difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
With the exception of the scale of demands, all measures assessing psychosocial work conditions were associated with an overall sense of job satisfaction and were statistically highly significant (test probability value of p < 0.001).
The overall model was highly significant (Omnibus test of model coefficients, p < 0.001).
Also, a GLM of some traits measured at 45 DAP, with the number of commercial roots (NCR) from mature field-grown plants in 2017, produced a highly significant ( p <0.001) positive relationship (NCR in field-grown plants = 3.469±0.707 + 0.409±0.233*NUNR (45 DAP) + 0.585±0.216*NLNR (45 DAP) + -0.226±0.113*TNR (45 DAP)), explaining 29.4% of the variation in NCR in the 2017 field screening.
Notably, highly significant interactions were observed for word 4 and word 5 (word 4, t = 11.065, p < 0.001; word 5, t = 4.585, p < 0.001).
There was a highly significant difference in distances travelled by caterpillars before and after parasitoid egression (Wilcoxon Matched Pairs test: V = 153, P<0.001).
The mean levels of serum COMP in ng/ml, CTX-II in ng/ml, DKK1in pg/ml, TNF-αpg/ml, and IL-17 pg/ml were 5.71 ±7.04, 0.45 ±0.27, 5619.1 ±1731.4: 2.70 ±1.31, 0.23 ±0.16, 3276.96 ±1306.77, 6.4 ±2.25: 1.55 ±0.61, and 14.3 ±3.88: 5.86 ±1.09, respectively, with highly significant difference ( p = 0.001, for five biomarkers).
The time effect was highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming consistent clinical improvements across time points.
In contrast, PTXF-treated NSCs underwent differentiation into the oligodendrocyte lineage, as demonstrated by a complete and highly significant shift towards OLIG2 + cells (86.67% ± 6.67%, +PTXF, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test, *** p < 0.001, Figure 4 E) which were not detectable in the untreated control (0%, −PTXF, Figure 4 E).
[ 13 ] did not provide any justification for the inferred highly significant difference in the failure rate ( P < 0.001) favouring SCPs in performing hip aspirations.
The dual threshold setting originated from the t ‐test, as Figure S8b , in which the difference in P FSR between RA and HC sera was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
However, when grouped according to education, respondents who had secondary level as their highest educational attainment (Md = 116, n = 167) showed the topmost medicinal plant knowledge when compared to primary (Md = 105, n = 57) and tertiary (Md = 92, n = 111) as revealed by the highly significant difference presented in Kruskal-Wallis test ( p < 0.001).
However, the interaction effect turned out to be highly significant [ F (1,15) = 18.74, p = 0.001, η_p^2 = 0.55].
Figure 1 (see PDF) denotes highly significant decreases in the Plaque Index in both Group 1 (Cervitec® Plus) and Group 2 (diode laser) at one month (p < 0.001).
After controlling for monthly variation in rainfall, temperature, and relative humidity, the long-term trend interaction term (treated_group#c.monthly_date) remained highly significant (beta = −0.0056, 95% CI: −0.0076, −0.0037,p < 0.001) ( Table 4 ).
The difference in referring department between PRP-Yes and PRP-No groups was highly significant ( P < .001).