“highly significant”

Regarding the Metabolic Index (UH 2 /U) Boisdron-Celle et al 2007, 24 demonstrated that the UH 2 /U ratio is inversely correlated to the observed toxicity, and that the correlation is highly significant (p < 0.001).

Regarding SS, the two groups exhibited a highly significant difference, with higher values for those with incomplete revascularization (21.44 ± 2.83 vs. 14.77 ± 4.67, P=<0.001) ( Table 2 ). 3.1 One-year outcomes in patients who underwent either complete or partial revascularization A total of 397 patients had measurable clinical outcomes.

TAS2R38 supertasters are associated with lower risk of AD with the advancement of age From LME modeling of the longitudinal change in cognitive assessments and biomarkers in ADNI ( n = 2,168), highly significant interactions ( P < 0.001) were found between age and the alternative allele counts of each of the SNPs.

To confirm the two-step model of Fas increase, we performed a post hoc test for linear trend, which was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for both % (slope 18.8) and MFI (slope 64.1).

The Tissue × Origin interaction term was highly significant for all three enzymes ( P < 0.001), indicating that the immune expression of B. lenok under different growth environments is tissue-specific. 3.5 Analysis of antioxidant parameters As shown in Figure 5 , hepatic CAT activity and GSH content in the wild group were significantly higher than in the farmed group ( P < 0.01).

A Chi-squared test showed highly significant differences in AE reporting (p≤0.001) and AE grading (p≤0.001) Lower grades were more frequently reported for nonsurgical AEs.

1 , the correlation coefficients (r) between both methods were positive and highly significant ( P < 0.001) and ranged from 0.91 (Ca) to 0.94 (P).

There was a highly significant (P < 0.001) enrichment of CSF tracer in the subarachnoid space (SAS) adjacent to the straight gyrus with peak enrichment after 3–6 h (Fig. 1 ; Supplementary Table S1 ).

This difference in worker caste integration effect among body regions was highly significant (two‐sample z test; p < .001).

Moreover, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed a significant difference in overall survival between high and low ACSL5 expression groups (p = 0.013), while PRDX1 showed even stronger prognostic value, with an inverse survival trend and highly significant difference (p < 0.001) ( Figures 7J, K ).

A highly significant (p-value < 0.001) and direct correlation existed between the three SSIPPE-Br domains and all evaluated CABI domains.

The description of variables are as follows: Description of quantitative variables: mean and standard deviation (SD) Description of qualitative variables: numbers (No.) and percentages (%) Comparison between both groups regarding categorical data using the Chi-square test Comparison between both groups regarding scale data done using the independent t test The significance results were assessed in the form of P value: Non-significant when P value > 0.05 Significant when P value ≤ 0.05 Highly significant when P value ≤ 0.001 Results This study is a prospective single-center comparative study.

rosea on egg mortality ANOVA showed that spore concentration had a highly significant effect on egg mortality ( p < 0.001), with mortality increasing at higher concentrations of both fungal species ( Table 3 ).

This quantification showed a dramatic and highly significant depletion of CD19+ B cells in AML patients (mean frequency ± standard deviation; HD: 12.4 ± 8.3; AML: 2.9 ± 3.2, p < 0.001) ( Figure 1B ).

The m-30s-CST difference was highly significant in those who improved on the SPPB versus the patients who worsened or remained stable on the SPPB (P < 0.001) ( Fig 2A and Table 2 ).

The analysis of variance (Table 3 ) showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ) between accessions in all assessed quantitative agronomic characteristics.

Asterisks indicate significance of the likelihood ratio (LR) test (* p -value < 0.05, ** p -value < 0.01 and *** p -value < 0.001- highly significant).

We observed highly significant strain effects for almost all behavioral measurements investigated ( P < 0.001).

It appears that ML increased from about 0.42% in 1997 to 0.70% in 2001 largely due to cases of NHL (2.0–3.7%) and HD (0.6–1.3%) whereas the incidence of BL remained constant, which differences were statistically highly significant (p-value = 0.001) [Figure 2 ].

In particular, forty-one people recognized CTRL and T2 for their different color ( p < 0.01), whereas the number of correct answers increased when considering odor, texture and taste, with highly significant results ( p < 0.001).

Similar to the results for Model 1, both location and time were highly significant variables for all cohorts ( p < 0.001).

Results: Among the different cutaneous manifestations, highly significant ( P value <0.001) was found between SLE and nonscarring alopecia, photosensitivity, oral ulcer, malar rash (in decreasing order of odds favoring the association with SLE).

In contrast, methylated breast cancer specimens exhibited a highly significant (P < 0.001) loss of ID4 expression (median fold change = 12.3).

However, the omission of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline (popcorn-like) (M5) or δ-decalactone (oily/peach) (M7) resulted in a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) reduction in the characteristic aroma of the fry breads.

The results indicated highly significant differences in rates (χ2=1236.66; df=2; p<0.001), confirming that the observed increase during the peak period was statistically significant and not due to chance.