“highly significant”

Analysis with the Fisher's Exact test (one sided) revealed that the overlap is highly significant (P < 0.001).

In terms of sequence identity, all three clades show highly significant genetic divergence from each other (all P < 0.001), indicating they have evolved into three distinct genetic lineages.

However, the CCA models of CAs 1 to 3 were highly significant ( p = 0.001), and the axes were significant, except for built-up areas ( p = 0.107).

A mixed-design ANOVA on the total efficacy score indicated a highly significant main effect of Time, F (1, 479) = 311.17, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.39.

The model also illustrates that education remains highly significant, with higher education, secondary and primary education groups showing ORs of 2.693, 2.672 and 1.474, respectively (p<0.001 for secondary and higher education).

Smooth term analysis indicated that temporal trends were highly significant in the polluted site (Ambient, polluted: edf = 5.777, p < 0.001; Warmed, polluted: edf = 5.818, p < 0.001), but were non‐significant in the non‐polluted site (SI Table S16 ). 3.2.4 Green Microalgae Concentration For green microalgae, only the June data provided sufficient variation to fit a GLM; on all subsequent sampling dates, concentrations were essentially zero.

The GAM smooth term for year was highly significant in both groups (AI/CV: χ 2 ≈ 763, p < 0.001; passive mechanical: χ 2 ≈ 995, p < 0.001), indicating strong non-linear temporal structure, albeit with reduced parsimony relative to the Boltzmann model.

The analysis demonstrated a highly significant positive effect of song familiarity on the degree of fun perception (B = 0.774, p < 0.001), confirming Hypothesis H1a.

Discriminant validity The dimension “Ease of Use” displayed no significant correlation with “Convenience” ( P > 0.001) but exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with “Discreetness” ( P < 0.001, r = 0.744). “Convenience” demonstrated a significant positive correlation with “Psychological Well-being” ( P < 0.001, r = 0.720) but showed no association with “Discreetness”. “Psychological Well-being” had no discernible relationship with either “Ease of Use” or “Discreetness” ( P > 0.001) (See Fig. 4 ).

The interaction was highly significant ( P <0.001), supporting the SEM result that the effect of larval size on pupal size was strongly modulated by salinity condition ( Table S2 ).

Bartlett’s test was also highly significant, χ 2 (45) = 1668.659, p < 0.001, rejecting the null hypothesis that the correlation matrix is an identity matrix and confirming that the inter-item correlations are sufficient to justify factor analysis.

The risk estimates for those aged fifty years and older were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The McNemar’s test showed this change to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 2 ].

The supplementation of vegetable leaves resulted in a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect on individual egg mass, with chickens in T3 (65.6 ± 0.5 g) producing heavier eggs compared to those in T1, T2, and T4 ( Table 4 ).

Factor structure The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of the sampling adequacy of our data was very high (0.958), and Bartlett’s test of sphericity (5326.7) was highly significant (p < 0.001).

After adjusting for age, sex, severity of lung disease, BMI, pack-year smoking, current smoking status and IRSAD, risk of death remained highly significant (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.33–2.35, p < 0.001).

In their results, the authors observed a highly significant decrease in impulsivity ( p <.001).

Numeracy shows a highly significant positive relationship with answer correctness regardless of whether the outcome is concordant ( β = 0.111, CI = [0.099, 0.317], P < 0.001) or discordant ( β = 0.110, CI = [0.095, 0.307], P < 0.001), see Fig. 1 A .

However, there was a highly significant difference in the total scores according to the presence or absence of AOS (p < 0.001), and while the inter-rater reliability for some individual items was low, the inter-rater reliability for the total score was high at an excellent range.

Management method significantly affected BD and SP ( p < 0.05) but not MC, while management duration exerted highly significant effects on all three parameters ( p < 0.001) ( Figure S1 and Table S1 ).

For E P and E , one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( F = 40.59 and F = 19.13, respectively; both p < 0.001).

For those participants, the alcohol content was unknown; 36(66.7%) were using 1–3 times a day hand sanitizer while those sanitizers had single alcohol were used more than 20 times/day by 21(63.6%), which was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

We verified this by testing the overlap between the TF motif-gene cis -regulations inferred by MLC as applied to the LiCAT-seq human embryonic development dataset, 38 and the cis -regulations inferred by MethCorTarget applied to the DNAme human embryonic development dataset 39 : we found a highly significant overlap, odds ratio OR = 13.3 ( 12.9 − 13.8 ) ( p < 0.001 , Fisher’s exact test).

However, a highly significant regional variation was observed for well-being, F (3, 875) = 20.05, p < 0.001, and mindful self-care, F (3, 875) = 16.12, p < 0.001.

The Mantel test indicated a highly significant correlation ( r 2 = 0.734; P <0.001) between the genetic distances and spatial distances of weedy rice populations, indicating that genetic differentiation among weedy rice populations was significantly correlated with their geographical distribution.